Current status of outpatient heart failure management in Egypt and recommendations for the future.

Heart failure (HF) represents one of the greatest healthcare burdens worldwide, and Egypt is no exception. HF healthcare programmes in Egypt still require further optimization to enhance diagnosis and management of the disease. Development of specialized HF clinics (HFCs) and their incorporation in the healthcare system is expected to reduce HF hospitalization and mortality rates and improve quality of care in Egypt. We conducted a literature search on PubMed on the requirements and essential infrastructure of HFCs. Retrieved articles deemed relevant were discussed by a panel of 10 expert cardiologists from Egypt and a basic HFC model for the Egyptian settings was proposed. A multidisciplinary team managing the HFC should essentially be composed of specialized HF cardiologists and nurses, clinical pharmacists, registered nutritionists, physiotherapists, and psychologists. Other clinical specialists should be included according to patients' needs and size and structure of individual clinics. HFCs should receive patients referred from primary care settings, emergency care units, and physicians from different specialties. A basic HFC should have the following fundamental investigations available: resting electrocardiogram, basic transthoracic echocardiogram, and testing for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Fundamental patients' functional assessments are assessing the New York Heart Association functional classification and quality of life and conducting the 6 min walking test. guideline-directed medical therapy should be implemented, and device therapy should be utilized when available. In the first visit, once HF is diagnosed and co-morbidities assessed, guideline-directed medical therapy should be started immediately. Comprehensive patient education sessions should be delivered by HF nurses or clinical pharmacists. The follow-up visit should be scheduled during the initial visit rather than over the phone, and time from the initial visit to the first follow-up visit should be determined based on the patient's health status and needs. Home and virtual visits are only recommended in limited and emergency situations. In this paper, we provide a practical and detailed review on the essential components of HFCs and propose a preliminary model of HFCs as part of a comprehensive HF programme model in Egypt. We believe that other low-to-middle income countries could also benefit from our proposed model.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: dyssynchrony imaging from a heart failure perspective.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the evidence for and against imaging as a means of selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). RECENT FINDINGS: There is no evidence that either the QRS interval on the surface ECG or dyssynchrony measured by imaging is of any practical value in predicting the clinical response to CRT in patients with a dilated and dysfunctional left ventricle. Careful assessment of the patient, so that therapy can be logically aligned with treatment goals, such as improving symptoms or prognosis, is the only useful method for selecting patients. Simple clinical evaluation may be as effective as, or more effective than, more complex assessments in predicting treatment benefits. Patients with a low blood pressure and moderate functional mitral regurgitation might benefit more, in absolute terms, from CRT. The benefits of adding a defibrillator to CRT are modest and, for many patients, uncertain. SUMMARY: Echocardiography, which was supposed to facilitate the introduction of CRT, may have become the greatest barrier to its appropriate implementation. Cardiac dyssynchrony, measured by echocardiography prior to implantation, may not be the substrate for the effects of CRT.

Should patients who have persistent severe symptoms receive a left ventricular assist device or cardiac resynchronization therapy as the next step?

Currently, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) should be considered before a left ventricular assist device for most patients who have moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and have not responded symptomatically to conventional pharmacologic measures. There is little evidence that the severity of cardiac dyssynchrony as measured using current techniques is useful in predicting the benefits of CRT. QRS duration on the surface ECG is a surrogate marker of the severity of the left ventricular ejection fraction as well as of several types of dyssynchrony. More clinical trials are required to determine whether excluding patients who have QRS duration less than 120 msec or those who have no evidence of dyssynchrony from implantation of CRT is appropriate. Perhaps all patients who have moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be considered for CRT, either to improve symptoms if they are persistent or relapsing, or to improve outcome. In the longer-term future, it is possible that the development of less expensive, small, and safe left ventricular assist devices will supplant the role of both CRT and CRT-defibrillator devices.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy or atrio-biventricular pacing-what should it be called?

Reduced cardiac efficiency caused by suboptimal synchronization of the heart's normal contraction might contribute to the development of or exacerbate heart failure. Conceptually and in practice cardiac dyssynchrony is complex. Recent studies have shown that atrio-biventricular pacing can improve cardiac synchrony in many patients and improve cardiac function, symptoms and exercise capacity, and reduce morbidity and mortality substantially. Randomized controlled trials, however, indicate that the severity of cardiac dyssynchrony, as conventionally measured, is a poor guide to treatment benefit and that correction of dyssynchrony accounts for only part of the benefit of atrio-biventricular pacing. Although some of the benefits of atrio-biventricular pacing might be mediated by cardiac resynchronization, much of the benefit could be mediated by mechanisms that are as yet unknown. Withholding atrio-biventricular pacing in patients who do not exhibit cardiac dyssynchrony on imaging but otherwise fulfil the entry criteria used in randomized controlled trials of this therapy could be unwise. Here, we examine the evidence that cardiac resynchronization is indeed the mechanism by which atrio-biventricular pacing exerts its effects.