Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 88: 145-153, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35872211

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Localized popliteal artery occlusion (LPAO) is a rare entity with a challenging therapy. In selected patients, open popliteal endarterectomy (OPE) with infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty (IPA) can be limb-saving. The aim of this retrospective study from Iraq-Kurdistan is to assess the procedure outcomes. METHODS: Over 5 years, ending at 2020, 28 patients with atherosclerotic LPAO unsuitable for femoropopliteal bypass or endovascular intervention received OPE + IPA through a medial approach under spinal anesthesia. Perioperative data were obtained from patients' records and entered into an Access database. Results were retrieved and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: There were 18 (64.3%) males. The mean age was 66.4 ± 6.53 years (range 52-79 years). Seventy five percent of patients had obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. Twenty six (92.9%) of patients were in Rutherford category 5 and 6 with an ankle-brachial index < 0.40. Popliteal and pedal pulses were absent in 23 of 24 (95.8%) patients. Doppler ultrasound showed a good distal runoff in 1 (3.6%) patient. Computed tomography angiography revealed 20 (71.4%) femoropopliteal and 16 (57.1%) infrapopliteal lesions of types A and B as per Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II document. Mean endarterectomy length was 5.1 cm (range 3-7), patched with a vein in (17, 60.7%) and primarily closed in (11, 39.3%) patients. Early complications were none in (18, 64.3%) patients whereas 1 leg was amputated on day 30. On average, follow-up lasted 3.4 years. Twenty seven (96.4%) vessels remained patent and 2 (7.1%) patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms safety and efficacy of OPE + IPA for selected patients with critical limb ischemia due to LPAO.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Doença Arterial Periférica , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/etiologia , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 72: 535-543, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32927043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of the ischemic diabetic foot (DF) due to infrapopliteal arterial disease is challenging and controversial. Observation, bypass surgery, and endovascular intervention are the 3 available options. Outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) versus conservative therapy is evaluated in this prospective study from Sulaymaniyah, Iraq. METHODS: Over 2 years starting at January 2018, 40 patients with ischemic DF underwent PTA and compared with a control group (n = 78) of ischemic DF managed conservatively. Besides clinical assessment, all patients underwent Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography while conventional angiography was reserved for PTA group. Patients who fulfilled the standard angiographic findings underwent standard PTA, and their outcome was compared with the control group. RESULTS: Mean age was 64 years; 70% (n = 28) were men with a male: female ratio of 2.3: 1. Renal function was impaired in (n = 11, 27.5%), and 7 (17.5%) patients were smokers. The commonest clinical presentation was nonhealing ulcers (n = 39, 97.5%), and most patients (n = 39, 97.5%) had Fontaine IV and Rutherford V-VI grades. Most lesions were anatomically complex; Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D types, Graziani class ≥4 (75%), long segment (n = 28, 70%), and chronic total occlusion (n = 26, 65%). Success rate was (n = 38, 95%), and no patient died. Ulcer healing was higher (67.5% vs. 34.6%), and ulcer recurrence was lower (20% vs. 47.4%) in PTA group but amputation rate was not significantly different (12.5% vs. 12.8%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although amputation and death rates were not significantly different, endovascular intervention achieved better ulcer healing in ischemic DF compared with the conservative approach.


Assuntos
Angioplastia , Cateterismo Periférico , Tratamento Conservador , Pé Diabético/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Cicatrização , Adulto , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Conservador/efeitos adversos , Pé Diabético/diagnóstico , Pé Diabético/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Iraque , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...