Simultaneous Discordant B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma and Follicular Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: We report a rare case of B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) and low-grade follicular lymphoma (FL) identified concurrently in biopsies from different sites at the initial diagnosis in a 39-year-old man. The clonal relationship between the 2 histologic subtypes was investigated. METHODS: A diagnosis of FL grade 1/2 (low grade) was made by bone marrow (BM) biopsy. B-LBL was identified in biopsies from the testis and pancreas. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses were performed to investigate their clonal relationship. RESULTS: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses and G-banding karyotype analyses identified the BCL2-IGH and MYC-IGH translocation in tumor cells from both the BM and testis. The tumor cells from the BM and testis shared the same IGH VDJ usage and a high degree of somatic mutations. These findings suggest that acquisition of MYC gene rearrangement is a critical event for lymphoblastic transformation of FL. Of note, the presence of intraclonal diversity in the B-LBL sample further suggests an earlier or concurrent event of MYC translocation than the somatic IGH mutation in the germinal center and the dedifferentiation of lymphoma cells to a precursor stage of B-cell development. CONCLUSIONS: B-lymphoblastic transformation of FL can occur with MYC gene rearrangement.

[Cooperation between Clinics and Hospitals Using a Critical Path for G-CSF Prophylaxis in Cancer Chemotherapy].

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF)is necessary for some cancer patients receiving anti-cancer drugs. However, it is difficult for cancer patients in rural areas to receive G-CSF as outpatients because of inconvenient official transport, lack of public support, and low activity levels due to age. To resolve this problem, we began conducting a critical path(G-path)with regional medical institutions from 2011. METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed the clinical records of cancer patients receiving prophylactic G-CSF using G-path at our hospital. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients who were administered a total of 254 cycles of chemotherapy were examined between January 2011 and December 2016. Diseases included malignant lymphoma(n=64), pancreatic cancer(n=7), soft tissue sarcoma(n=5), and others(n=6). The median age of the patients was 70(range: 24-94)years. Fifty-three patients visited medical offices, and 31 patients visited regional hospitals. In 245 of 254(96%)cycles, planned G-CSF administration was performed. In 37 of 254(15%)cycles, infectious episodes developed, but patients needed hospitalization for only 5 cycles(2%). CONCLUSION: Cooperation between clinics and hospitals using G-path reduced ambulatory burden and prevented severe infection. Cooperation in supportive care may allow for equal accessibility to cancer treatment.

A prospective study of palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in malignant lymphoma patients following highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a troublesome issue in chemotherapy for cancer patients. A second-generation 5HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3RA), palonosetron, is effective and safe for the prevention of CINV in breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide and anthracycline, but there is little data for malignant lymphoma. We conducted a prospective phase 2 study at a single institution to clarify the efficacy and safety of palonosetron in lymphoma patients. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve lymphoma patients who were treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) received a single intravenous bolus of palonosetron, 0.75 mg/body, before chemotherapy on day 1 during the first course of chemotherapy. The occurrence of CINV was assessed using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) antiemesis tool, which was recorded by patients during the first course of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were enrolled, and 49 patients were eligible and evaluated. The complete response (CR) rate was 93.9% (95% confidence interval 83.1-98.7%) at 0-120 h post-chemotherapy. The proportion of patients who developed nausea of any grade and vomiting at 0-120 h post-chemotherapy was 34.7 and 6.1%, respectively. Although treatment-related adverse events were observed in 36 (73.5%) patients, these were mild and they recovered by the next cycle of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that a single dose of palonosetron was highly effective and safe for the prevention of CINV in lymphoma patients.