Risk factors for remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective database review.

Background: The number of patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) is increasing due to the increasing number of patients undergoing function-preserving gastrectomy and improved outcomes for patients with GC. A few studies involving a small number of cases reported male sex, old age, differentiated type, tumor depth and synchronous multiple GC were associated with RGC development. However, the risk factors for RGC development had not been fully understood. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological features, followed up patients with GC after they underwent distal gastrectomy (DG), and evaluated the potential risk factors for RGC development. Methods: A retrospective database review of 438 patients who underwent DG for GC at a single institution, from 2006 to 2017, was conducted. We investigated the relationship of clinicopathological features, operative findings, and postoperative course with RGC development was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The cumulative incidences of RGC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 405 cases. The median patient age was 69 years, and the patient cohort consisted of 263 men and 142 women. The Billroth-I reconstruction method was used in 204 cases, Billroth-II method was used in 3 cases, and Roux-en Y method was used in 198 cases. RGC was diagnosed in 11 of the 405 patients. The median follow-up period was 5 years. The cumulative incidences of RGC calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were 3.0%, 4.1%, and 10.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years after DG, respectively. During the initial surgery, differentiated type was significantly associated with RGC development [hazard ratio (HR): 4.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-21.80, P=0.05]. Male sex (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.64-13.75, P=0.16), old age (≥70 years) (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 0.78-9.47, P=0.11), and synchronous multiple GC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.28-6.08, P=0.73) were not associated with RGC development. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone DG for differentiated type GC were statistically significantly associated with developing RGC. Intensive endoscopic surveillance would be needed for the patients who underwent DG for differentiated type GC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy can prolong recurrence-free survival but did not influence the type of recurrence or subsequent treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Although liver resection is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases, recurrence is frequent. We previously published the early results of a randomized controlled phase 3 trial showing that adjuvant therapy with uracil-tegafur and leucovorin significantly prolongs recurrence-free survival. This study sought to elucidate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patient survival after an additional follow-up period, building upon the results of our previous study. METHODS: After resection for colorectal liver metastases, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin or surgery alone. Patients assigned to the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group received 5 cycles of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin within 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Patients were assigned to an adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (n = 90) or a surgery alone (n = 90) group; 3 patients were excluded because of protocol violations. After a median follow-up period of 7.36 years (95% confidence interval, 6.93-7.87), 60 (68.2%) patients in the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group and 61 (68.5%) patients in the surgery alone group developed recurrences. The median recurrence-free survival was 1.45 years (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.16) in the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group and 0.70 years (95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.07) in the surgery alone group. The locations and treatments of the first recurrences did not differ between the groups, nor did the overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.38; P = .54). The overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative repeated resection than in patients who received non-surgical treatment (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.40; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin significantly prolonged the recurrence-free survival but not the overall survival. The repeated resection was the most important factor influencing overall survival.

Optimal diagnostic method using multidetector-row computed tomography for predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of nodal involvement in colorectal cancer is an important aspect of preoperative workup to determine the necessity of preoperative treatment and the adequate extent of lymphadenectomy during surgery. This study aimed to investigate newer multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) findings for better predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in colorectal cancer. METHODS: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study; all underwent MDCT prior to surgery and upfront curative resection for colorectal cancer. LNs with a short-axis diameter (SAD) ≥ 4 mm were identified on MDCT images, and the following measures were recorded by two radiologists independently: two-dimensional (2D) SAD, 2D long-axis diameter (LAD), 2D ratio of SAD to LAD, 2D CT attenuation value, three-dimensional (3D) SAD, 3D LAD, 3D SAD to LAD ratio, 3D CT attenuation value, LN volume, and presence of extranodal neoplastic spread (ENS), as defined by indistinct nodal margin, irregular capsular enhancement, or infiltration into adjacent structures. RESULTS: Forty-six patients presented 173 LNs with a SAD ≥ 4 mm, while 24 patients exhibited pathologically confirmed LN metastases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that 2D LAD was the most sensitive measure for LN metastases with an area under the curve of 0.752 (cut-off value, 7.05 mm). When combined with CT findings indicating ENS, 2D LAD (> or ≤ 7 mm) showed enhanced predictive power for LN metastases (area under the curve, 0.846; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LAD in axial MDCT imaging is the most sensitive measure for predicting colorectal LN metastases, especially when MDCT findings of ENS are observed.

The Usefulness of Patch Repair Using the Repermeabilized Umbilical Vein of the Round Ligament for Hepatobiliary Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with tumors invading major veins may require combined resection and reconstruction. However, venous reconstruction often demands complex hepatobiliary and vascular surgical procedures. In this study, we report a simple patch repair technique for venous reconstruction using the repermeabilized umbilical vein of the round ligament. METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of eleven patients who underwent venous wedge resection and patch repair using the repermeabilized umbilical vein of the round ligament at our institution. RESULTS: Procurement of the round ligament and method of making a patch is simple. The duration of anastomosis was approximately 15 min. Eight patients (73%) underwent hepatic resection followed by hepatic vein reconstruction; two (18%) pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction; one (9%) hepatic resection followed by IVC reconstruction. Although one reconstructed vein became narrowed, the other ten veins were patent after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patch repair using the repermeabilized umbilical vein of the round ligament is a simple and useful technique.

Short-Term Outcomes after Simultaneous Colorectal and Major Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Resection of the liver is the standard therapeutic approach for patients with hepatic metastasis and is the only therapy with curative potential. The optimal timing of surgical resection for synchronous metastases has remained controversial. METHODS: From January 1993 to December 2008, our strategy has been to use simultaneous resection for resectable synchronous colorectal and liver metastases. During this period, 115 patients underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of these patients by reviewing operative and perioperative clinical data. RESULTS: In patients with simultaneous resection, there was no evidence of colorectal complications associated with major hepatectomy or no evidence of hepatic complications related to rectal resection. But increased hepatic complications were apparent with major hepatectomy compared with minor hepatectomy (44 vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001) and patients with rectal resection had increased colorectal complications (23% in the rectal resection vs. 5.3% in the colectomy group, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous major hepatectomy and rectal resection can increase the hepatic or colorectal morbidity, respectively. These patients may be considered for staged resections.

Adjuvant Oral Uracil-Tegafur with Leucovorin for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM) remains a crucial problem. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (UFT/LV). METHODS: In the multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, patients undergoing curative resection of CLM were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the UFT/LV group or surgery alone group. The UFT/LV group orally received 5 cycles of adjuvant UFT/LV (UFT 300mg/m2 and LV 75mg/day for 28 days followed by a 7-day rest per cycle). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between February 2004 and December 2010, 180 patients (90 in each group) were enrolled into the study. Of these, 3 patients (2 in the UFT/LV group and 1 in the surgery alone group) were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Median follow-up was 4.76 (range, 0.15-9.84) years. The RFS rate at 3 years was higher in the UFT/LV group (38.6%, n = 88) than in the surgery alone group (32.3%, n = 89). The median RFS in the UFT/LV and surgery alone groups were 1.45 years and 0.70 years, respectively. UFT/LV significantly prolonged the RFS compared with surgery alone with the hazard ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.83; P = 0.003). The hazard ratio for death of the UFT/LV group against the surgery alone group was not significant (0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.35; P = 0.409). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy with UFT/LV effectively prolongs RFS after hepatic resection for CLM and can be recommended as an alternative choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry C000000013.

A long-surviving case of gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus after surgical resection and postoperative S-1 therapy.

Gastric cancer patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus usually have a short survival time, owing to its aggressive behavior. Herein, we report a long-surviving case of gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus. A 78-year-old man presenting with anorexia and body weight loss was diagnosed with gastric cancer. The patient was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Endoscopy revealed a type 3 tumor (8.0 cm in length) in the body of the stomach. Biopsy led to the diagnosis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a large tumor thrombus extending from the gastric coronary vein to the portal trunk. A total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, splenectomy, and thrombectomy was performed. Postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 18 months. The patient died a natural death without recurrence at 49 postoperative months. To the best of our knowledge, the patient was the oldest to be diagnosed with gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus at diagnosis, who survived >36 months. Although gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus is a rare occurrence, its prognosis is extremely poor. Intensive surgery and long-term chemotherapy may be effective at improving survival time in these patients.

Phase 1 study on S-1 and oxaliplatin therapy as an adjuvant after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

of Background Data The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer has been confirmed in various studies. However, no adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) classified to stage IV has been established. Objectives We conducted a phase 1 study of S-1 and oxaliplatin to determine the recommended dose (RD) in patients with CLM as adjuvant therapy in two institutes. Methods S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered from day 1 to day 14 of a 3-week cycle as a 2-h infusion every 3 weeks, respectively. The initial doses of S-1 and oxaliplatin were fixed to 80 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively (level 1). We scheduled in the protocol a dose change of S-1 and oxaliplatin to level 2 (S-1: 80 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m(2)) or level 0 (S-1: 65 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin: 100 mg/m(2)) depending on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at level 1 in six patients. Results Because DLT occurred in one among the initial six patients at level 1, the doses were increased to level 2 in the next six patients. At level 2, grade 3 leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in one (16.7 %) and two (33.3 %) patients, respectively, in the absence of non-hematological event. Because no DLT occurred at level 2, we suggest that the RD can be set to the level 2 dose. The median number of cycles delivered at RD was 8. The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 and oxaliplatin at RD was 0.90 and 0.63, respectively. Conclusion In a patient undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, 80 mg/m(2) of S-1 and 130 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin are recommended as adjuvant therapy. A further study is required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this regimen on a larger scale.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left lateral decubitus position in an esophageal cancer patient with pectus excavatum.

During thoracic cavity operations, it is difficult to obtain sufficient working space and good operative field visibility in patients with pectus excavatum because the space between the vertebral bodies and sternum is very narrow. Here, we report the successful treatment of esophageal cancer in a patient with pectus excavatum. A 77-year-old man with esophageal cancer was referred to our hospital for further treatment. He was diagnosed with multiple early esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. The patient had pectus excavatum, but because it was asymptomatic, a video-assisted thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy in the left lateral decubitus position without pectus excavatum repair was selected. Despite the patient's unusual anatomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position allowed for good operative field visibility, as the videoscope was inserted from the side of the diaphragm. This operative procedure is useful in patients with esophageal cancer who also have pectus excavatum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second report of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in an esophageal cancer patient with pectus excavatum.

Routine Preoperative Liver-specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Exclude the Necessity of Contrast-enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound in Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) during surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) when gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) is performed as a part of preoperative imaging work-up. BACKGROUND: EOB-MRI is expected to supersede CE-IOUS, which is reportedly indispensable in surgery for CRLM. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients underwent EOB-MRI, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound within 1 month before surgery for CRLM. Conventional IOUS and subsequent CE-IOUS using perflubutane were performed after the laparotomy. All the nodules identified in any of the preoperative or intraoperative examinations were resected and were submitted for histological examination, in principle. RESULTS: Preoperative imaging examinations identified 242 nodules; 25 additional nodules were newly identified using IOUS, 22 additional nodules were newly identified during CE-IOUS, and a histological examination further identified 4 nodules. Among the 25 nodules newly identified using IOUS, all 21 histologically proven CRLMs and 3 of the 4 benign nodules were correctly diagnosed using CE-IOUS. Among the 22 nodules newly identified using CE-IOUS, 17 nodules in 16 patients were histologically diagnosed as CRLMs. The planned surgical procedure was modified on the basis of IOUS and CE-IOUS findings in 12 and 14 patients, respectively. The sensitivity, positive-predictive value, and accuracy of CE-IOUS were 99%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. Those values of EOB-MRI (82%, 99%, 83%, respectively) were similar to CE-CT (81%, 99%, 81%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CE-IOUS is useful in hepatic resection for CRLM, even if EOB-MRI and CE-CT are performed.

Repeat resection leads to long-term survival: analysis of 10-year follow-up of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Some reports have shown that a significant number of patients experience recurrence, even after 5 or more years after surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). This study aimed to determine the actual cure rate and identify clinical characteristics among long-term survivors. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was used to retrospectively review patients who underwent liver resection for CLM between 1994 and 2001. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients underwent liver resection for CLM with a complete 10-year follow-up. The 10-year disease-specific survival rate was 31.1%, and the survival curve reached a plateau after 10 years from the time of hepatic resection. There were 35 actual 10-year survivors. Multivariate analysis revealed that female patients and those with negative surgical margins were independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: A 10-year survival following initial hepatectomy should be defined as cure.

Pancreatoduodenectomy With Systematic Mesopancreas Dissection Using a Supracolic Anterior Artery-first Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the details of the surgical technique of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with systematic mesopancreas dissection (SMD-PD), using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. BACKGROUND: An artery-first approach in PD has been advocated in pancreatic cancer to judge resectability, clear the superior mesenteric artery margin from invasion, or reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy of an artery-first approach in mesopancreas dissection remains unclear. METHODS: This study involved 162 consecutive patients who underwent PD with curative intent. The patients were divided into 82 SMD-PDs and 80 conventional PDs (CoPD) and then stratified further according to the dissection level, that is, level 1 was applied to 24 simple mesopancreas divisions for early inflow occlusion including 11 SMD-PDs, level 2 for 63 en bloc mesopancreas resections (26 SMD-PDs), and level 3 for 75 patients who underwent a hemicircumferential superior mesenteric artery plexus resection to keep the margin free from cancer invasion (45 SMD-PDs). The clinical and imaging results were collected to assess the feasibility and validity of SMD-PD with an artery-first approach. RESULTS: Blood loss and operation duration were significantly less in the SMD-PD group than in the CoPD group among the total 162 patients. The imaging analysis showed that four fifths of pancreatic arterial branches came from the right dorsal aspect of the superior mesenteric artery and cancer abutment occurred exclusively from the same direction indicating the validity of an artery-first approach. CONCLUSIONS: SMD-PD using an SAA is feasible across PD cases, with acceptable short-term outcomes, and we propose this procedure as a promising option for PD.

Hobson's choice two-stage hepatectomy for multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases with portal vein embolization: report of two cases.

Liver resection is recognized as the preferred treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) because it offers long-term survival; it is the only hope for a cure. However, in the majority of cases, liver surgery is contraindicated due to the small volume of the future remnant liver. To extend the surgical indications for CLM, a planned two-stage hepatectomy procedure with portal vein embolization (PVE) was developed specifically for patients with multiple and bilobar CLM. The rationale for performing the procedure was a concern about the possible overgrowth of intrafuture remnant liver lesions following PVE, and it was therefore recommended for all multiple bilobar CLM cases, even when one-stage hepatectomy was technically feasible. We recently performed Hobson's choice two-stage hepatectomy in two cases for reasons different from those of the original planned two-stage hepatectomy. In the present report, we describe our Hobson's choice two-stage hepatectomy strategy, which provided favorable short-term outcomes.

Anatomical Liver Resections Guided by 3-Dimensional Parenchymal Staining Using Fusion Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of anatomical liver resection (ALR) guided by fused images comprising a macroscopic view and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (fusion IGFI). BACKGROUND: ALR is established in treating hepatocellular carcinoma or other malignancies to achieve curability and functional preservation. However, the conventional demarcation technique (CDT) marks only the organ surface and sometimes fails to execute a completely valid demarcation. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive ALRs for focal liver malignancy were studied using fusion IGFI. Indocyanine green was administered systemically after selective inflow clamping in 12 patients or by portal puncture and direct injection in 12 patients, and we compared demarcation findings between fusion IGFI and CDT. The strength of contrast between target and nontarget areas was quantitatively calculated as contrast index and compared between IGFI and CDT according to injection technique or state of the liver surface. RESULTS: Fusion IGFI achieved valid demarcation in 23 of 24 patients (95.8%), whereas CDT achieved valid demarcation in only 10 patients (41.7%) (P < 0.0001). The contrast index of fusion IGFI was 0.81 (0.18-2.51), which was significantly higher than that of CDT at 0.12 (0.01-0.42) (P < 0.0001), and the same result was obtained regardless of the injection method or liver surface state used. ALR was conducted referring to 3-dimensional staining of target parenchyma, with no related perioperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion IGFI is a safe imaging technique for ALR that attained valid 3-dimensional parenchymal demarcation with better feasibility and clearer demarcation than CDT.

Reappraisal of the inferior right hepatic vein preserving liver resection.

BACKGROUND: To resect tumors infiltrating to the right hepatic vein at its root, right hemihepatectomy or that following portal vein embolization (PVE) is applied. If the IRHV is sizable, the IRHV preserving liver resection can be another option. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2007, the IRHV preserving liver resection was performed in 21 patients (IRHV group). The short-term outcomes after surgery of them p. RESULTS: There were no mortality and no significant difference between the IRHV and RH groups concerning the blood loss, the morbidity rates and the duration of hospital stay. The median operation time was shorter in the IRHV group than in the RH group (393 vs. 480 min, p = 0.0409). The median weight of resected specimen of the IRHV group was 293 g (range: 20-982), which was significantly lighter than that of the RH group (median: 680 g [250-4,300], p < 0.001). The median percentage of resected volume to standard liver volume was significantly smaller in the IRHV group than in the RH group (25.8 vs. 52.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The IRHV preserving liver resection remains a safe and useful procedure.

Favorable outcome after repeat resection for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The rate of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is high, and repeat resection (RR) is reserved with curative intent in selected patients. This study evaluated the benefit of RR for recurrence after liver resection for CLM. METHODS: Data were collected on 287 consecutive patients who underwent primary curative hepatectomy between January 1999 and October 2008 for CLM at our institution. RESULTS: After median follow-up of 63 months, 211 patients (73 %) developed recurrence and RR was conducted in 102 (48 %) patients. Five-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the RR group than in those patients not selected for RR (70 vs. 45 %, P = 0.002). On multivariate analyses, RR was identified as an independent factor for good prognosis. According to the first recurrence sites, 5-year OS after recurrence was significantly better in patients with liver or lung only recurrence (55, 51 %, respectively) than in locoregional/lymph node metastases and other/multiple sites recurrence (33, 9.0 %, respectively). In patients with liver- or lung-only recurrence, 5-year OS after recurrence was significantly higher in RR patients than in those without RR (liver; 67 and 0 %, lung; 88 and 24 %, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given similar indication criteria as the primary CLM, nearly half of all recurrence cases after liver resection for CLM could be salvaged by RR. In patients with liver-or lung-only recurrence, RR warrants a favorable outcome.

Surgical resection for local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastasis is more extensive than primary resection.

OBJECTIVE: As a minimally invasive modality, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly applied not only for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, but also for that of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, RFA for CLM has been shown to be associated with a high local recurrence rate, and no optimal treatment for RFA failure has been established yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of surgical resection for local recurrence after RFA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 17 patients, who underwent surgery for local recurrence after RFA for resectable CLM, was carried out. The surgical procedures involved in the actual surgery were compared with those envisioned for the primary resection if RFA had not been selected. RESULTS: Surgical resection for RFA recurrence was more invasive than the envisioned surgical procedure in 10 cases (58%). In addition, the proportions of cases that required technically demanding procedures among the patients receiving surgery for RFA recurrence were higher than those in envisioned operations; major hepatectomy, eight cases [47%] versus two cases [12%] (p<0.0205); excision and/or reconstruction of the major hepatic veins, three cases [18%] versus zero case [0%] (p=0.035); excision of diaphragm: three cases [18%] versus zero case [0%] (p=0.035). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 92%, 45% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for RFA recurrence for CLM required more invasive and technically demanding procedures. Thus, RFA for CLM should be limited to unresectable cases, and patients with resectable CLM should be thoroughly advised not to undergo RFA, but rather surgical resection.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in identifying disappearing liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma after chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy sometimes makes colorectal liver metastases disappear or diminish. Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) using perflubutane may identify such metastases. METHODS: Among 131 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection, 86 had received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these patients, 72 were examined using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), and CE-IOUS; these patients were the subject of the present study. Effects of IOUS and CE-IOUS to search for disappearing liver metastases (DLM) and tumors with a diameter of 1 cm or less based on the preoperative imaging were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 32 DLMs were noted in 11 patients. Four DLMs were identified using IOUS, and 16 DLMs (including the four DLMs identified using IOUS) were identified using CE-IOUS. Of the 16 DLMs that were missed using both IOUS and CE-IOUS, nine were resected using anatomical resection and seven were not resected. One of the nine resected DLMs was histologically proven to be adenocarcinoma. Three of the seven unresected DLMs showed tumor regrowth during a postoperative follow-up examination. CE-IOUS identified 79 % of the 19 DLMs that were ultimately confirmed as liver metastases, whereas IOUS identified 21 % of them (p < 0.004). Among the 202 tumors that were identified using preoperative imaging, 54 were 1 cm or less in diameter. The sensitivity of CE-IOUS for these tumors were superior to CE-CT (p < 0.04) and IOUS (p < 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CE-IOUS might be necessary after preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis.

Pancreatic insulinoma combined with glucagon positive cell: A case report.

We present a 70-year-old man who was referred for surgery with uncontrollable hypoglycemia. Ultrasonography and abdominal contrast computed tomography revealed a hypervascular tumor of 1 cm in diameter in the pancreatic tail. With a diagnosis of insulinoma, we performed a distal pancreatectomy. The patient showed a good postoperative course without any complications. The patient's early morning fasting hypoglycemia disappeared. The respective levels of C-peptide and insulin dropped from 14.9 ng/mL and 4860 µIU/mL preoperatively to 5.3 ng/mL and 553 µIU/mL after surgery. A histopathological examination demonstrated that the tumor was a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, grade 1. Immunostaining was negative for insulin and positive for CD56, chromogranin A, synaptophysin and glucagon. These findings suggested that the tumor was clinically an insulinoma but histopathologically a glucagonoma. Among all insulinoma cases reported between 1985 and 2010, only 5 cases were associated with independent glucagonoma. In this report, we characterize and discuss this rare type of insulinoma by describing the case we experienced in detail.

One-stage hepatectomy following portal vein embolization for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Although portal vein embolization (PVE) has been applied for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the clinical usefulness of liver surgery following PVE for CLM remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 115 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Among them, 49 underwent one-stage hepatectomy following PVE (PVE group). The remaining 66 patients underwent at least hemihepatectomy without PVE (non-PVE group). This analysis compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the PVE and non-PVE groups. RESULTS: There were no deaths in either group. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification, the rates of postoperative morbidity ≥ grade 1 were 34.7% in the PVE group and 25.0% in the non-PVE group (p = 0.26). The 3-year overall survival rates were 54.6 and 64.5% in the PVE and non-PVE groups, respectively (p = 0.89). The multivariate analysis the variable performance/nonperformance of PVE was not detected as an independent predictor of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our one-stage hepatectomy policy of using PVE provides acceptable morbidity and favorable long-term outcomes.