[Role of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessing pathophysiology of coronary artery disease].

It has been nine years since intravascular ultrasound imaging(IVUS) was for the first time performed in Japan at our hospital. During this period, the progress of catheter technology brought about many improvements in catheter design and image quality. Also clinical utility of IVUS has been widely recognized with accumulation of clinical experiences. The most important feature of this method is the capability of both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the atheroma. IVUS has mainly been used to help guide procedures during catheter interventions and has provided information about the mechanisms of dilatation and restenosis. Recently, the ability of IVUS in diagnosing morphologic changes such as compensatory enlargement, vessel shrinkage and plaque rupture has much attention. IVUS should enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease.

Clinical utility of negative contrast intravascular ultrasound to evaluate plaque morphology before and after coronary interventions.

Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used for evaluation of plaque volume and lumen size as well as detection of vessel wall structures after catheter-based interventions, differentiation between the lumen and plaque structures can be difficult. This study attempted to evaluate the efficacy of negative contrast IVUS imaging for assessment of vessel wall morphology after coronary interventions. IVUS studies were performed in 67 lesions in 66 patients before and after coronary interventions. After the baseline ultrasound imaging run, warm 5% glucose solution was injected manually through the guiding catheter into the coronary artery to washout blood from the lumen to avoid speckled reflections from red blood cells (negative contrast). Quantitative measurements were obtained and plaque morphology was assessed for the presence and extent of medial dissections and intimal flaps. There was no difference in each quantitative parameter between baseline images and negative contrast images. The vessel wall boundary was clearly delineated from the lumen, which was defined as effective negative contrast in 51 of 67 lesions (76%). The baseline images revealed plaque dissection in 9 lesions (18%) and an intimal flap in 13 lesions (25%). In addition, 4 dissections (8%) and 16 intimal flaps (31%) were visualized during the infusion of negative contrast. Additional treatment was performed in 4 lesions (8%) based on the images with negative contrast. Negative contrast IVUS was more sensitive in demonstrating a plaque fracture than were baseline images. This method is useful for enhancing the diagnostic capability of IVUS imaging and may influence the decision-making process during interventional procedures.

Plaque rupture as a cause of apparent coronary aneurysm formation following directional coronary atherectomy.

Late coronary aneurysm formation was observed following treatment by directional coronary atherectomy. Intravascular ultrasound disclosed that the mechanism involved was plaque rupture. The cause of coronary aneurysm may be multifactorial after coronary interventions. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is useful for understanding the pathologic mechanism of coronary aneurysm production.

Assessment of plaque rupture by intravascular ultrasound.

To investigate the mechanism of plaque rupture, we carried out morphologic and quantitative assessments of ruptured plaque with a 30-MHz intravascular ultrasound catheter before coronary intervention. Plaque rupture, defined as an echolucent intraplaque area communicating with arterial lumen, was noted in all of 22 patients with coronary artery disease examined in the study. The plaque was eccentric in 16 patients (73%) and in 10 of these 16 patients there was a tear at the margin of the plaque (63%). Calcification was noted in only 6 patients (22%). Plaque area ranged from 8.7 to 44.1 mm2. The ruptured area ranged widely, from 1.0 to 14.0 mm2, and the percent ruptured area also ranged widely, from 3.9% to 50.9%. Fibrous cap was recognized in 20 patients. The thickness of the fibrous cap ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 mm (mean, 0.36 mm) and thinning of the fibrous cap was noted in 16 patients (80%). From these results, we conclude that intravascular ultrasound can provide detailed observations of plaque rupture consistent with pathologic studies. Accordingly, it is a suitable method for evaluation of plaque rupture in vivo. Plaque weakness, due to the presence of atheromatous core, thin fibrous cap, and no calcification, seems to be the major determinant of plaque rupture. In addition, the great variation in cap thickness and ruptured area suggests the role of other triggers, such as mechanical and hemodynamic stress, in plaque rupture.