Indication for anterior spinal cord decompression via a posterolateral approach for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: For ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine, anterior decompression is the most effective method for relieving spinal cord compression. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the surgical outcomes based on our strategy in the treatment of thoracic OPLL. METHODS: This study included 23 patients who underwent surgery for thoracic OPLL based on the following strategy between 2011 and 2017. For patients with a beak-type OPLL in the kyphotic curve with a ≥ 50% canal occupying ratio, circumferential decompression via a posterolateral approach and fusion (CDF) was indicated. For other types of OPLL, posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) was commonly indicated. Posterior fusion without decompression (PF) was applied when the spinal cord was separated from the posterior spinal elements. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared among the CDF, PDF, and PF groups with a minimum of 20-month follow-up. RESULTS: Ten, eleven, and two patients underwent CDF, PDF, and PF, respectively. The preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score in the CDF group was significantly lower than that in the PDF group. The average recovery rate, according to JOA score, was 63%, 56%, and 25% in the CDF, PDF, and PF groups, respectively. The result in the CDF group was better than that in the PF group. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior decompression was appropriate for patients with localized spinal cord compression by a large OPLL in the kyphotic curve, and CDF via a posterolateral approach appears to be safe and effective. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Efficacy and Safety of Abdominal Trunk Muscle Strengthening Using an Innovative Device in Elderly Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Objective@# To examine the efficacy and safety of an innovative, device-driven abdominal trunk muscle strengthening program, with the ability to measure muscle strength, to treat chronic low back pain (LBP) in elderly participants. @*Methods@# Seven women with non-specific chronic LBP, lasting at least 3 months, were enrolled and treated with the prescribed exercise regimen. Patients participated in a 12-week device-driven exercise program which included abdominal trunk muscle strengthening and 4 types of stretches for the trunk and lower extremities. Primary outcomes were adverse events associated with the exercise program, improvement in abdominal trunk muscle strength, as measured by the device, and improvement in the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of LBP with the exercise. Secondary outcomes were improvement in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) score and the results of the locomotive syndrome risk test, including the stand-up and two-step tests. @*Results@# There were no reports of increased back pain or new-onset abdominal pain or discomfort during or after the device-driven exercise program. The mean abdominal trunk muscle strength, NRS, RDQ scores, and the stand-up and two-step test scores were significantly improved at the end of the trial compared to baseline. @*Conclusion@# No participants experienced adverse events during the 12-week strengthening program, which involved the use of our device and stretching, indicating the program was safe. Further, the program significantly improved various measures of LBP and physical function in elderly participants.