C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase are useful biomarkers for predicting the requirement for oxygen therapy in outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019

BackgroundIt is critical for clinicians seeing outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to identify those who will require oxygen therapy after the hospital visit. Although studies on biomarkers predicting mortality or ventilator requirement in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have been conducted, research on biomarkers predicting the need for oxygen therapy in outpatients is sparse. MethodsPatients with COVID-19 who visited Asahikawa City Hospital on an outpatient basis were included in the study. In total, 287 new outpatients visited between April 2021 and September 2021, and 142 underwent blood testing. All blood tests were performed before any treatments for COVID-19 were started. Demographic information, laboratory data, and clinical treatment information were extracted from the electronic medical records. Risk factors associated with oxygen therapy were explored. ResultsIn total, 40 of 142 patients who underwent blood testing required oxygen therapy within 7 days after blood samples were taken, and all other patients recovered without oxygen therapy. C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly higher in patients who required oxygen therapy, and their cutoffs were 36 mg/L (sensitivity, 0.802; specificity, 0.725) and 267 U/L (sensitivity, 0.713; specificity, 0.750), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified age, body mass index, CRP [≥] 36 mg/L, and LDH [≥] 267 U/L as significant risk factors for oxygen therapy requirement. This study suggests that elevated CRP and LDH levels are independent risk factors for oxygen therapy in outpatients with COVID-19. Further confirmatory studies are needed.

Mutations on non-structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 are possibly responsible for adverse clinical outcomes in a real-life practice

Among a cluster of COVID-19 cases from the end of March through April 2021 in Asahikawa, we experienced the cases in which patients manifested severe clinical symptoms compared to patients who were infected before that. A hundred three patients (age range: 65 to 89 years old) enrolled in this study were divided into two groups, group A: the patients infected from November 2020 to March 2021, and group B: the patients in this cluster population. The mortality rates were 6.1% in group A and 16.2% in group B (OR: 2.97, 95%CI: 0.65-15.38). For the severity of disease, the patients in group B required higher oxygen flow rate in early course of admission (mild; p=0.892, moderate; p=0.117, severe; p=0.029). Whole viral genome sequences revealed five non-synonymous mutations by comparison of the isolates with each group. Of these, four were on non-structural proteins (NSPs) including nsp3, 6 and 15, and one was on S protein located near the C-terminus, suggesting that the mutations on NSPs could be responsible for adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis

BackgroundRecent data from clinical trial suggest that antibody cocktail therapy, a combination of the monoclonal antibodies casirivimab and imdevimab, has been shown to rapidly reduce the viral load and markedly decrease the risk of hospitalization or death among high-risk patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, it remains unclear how effective in a real-life clinical setting the therapy is. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed mild to moderate Covid-19 patients with one or more high-risk factors for severe disease who consecutively underwent the antibody cocktail therapy of the disease in our institute in June 2021 through early September 2021, compared to those with high-risk factors who were isolated in non-medical facilities consecutively during the same period, thereby being not given the antibody cocktail therapy there. The key outcome was the percentage of patients with Covid-19-related deterioration which needed additional medical interventions, such as oxygen support or other antiviral therapies. ResultsData from 55 patients with initially receiving antibody cocktail therapy and 53 patients with isolation into non-medical facilities are analyzed. 22 (41.5 %) of 53 patients with isolation facilities were finally hospitalized to receive medical interventions. On the other hand, 13 (23.6 %) of 55 patients with antibody cocktail therapy in our hospital subsequently underwent further medical interventions because of the progression. In multivariate analysis with variables of age, BMI, and high-risk factors, the antibody cocktail therapy significantly reduced 70 % in the need for further medical interventions compared to the initial isolation in the non-medical facilities (odds ratio=0.30, 95%CI [0.10-0.87], p=0.027). Furthermore, patients with 96% or above of SPO2 were significantly more favorable for the therapy than those with 95% or below of SPO2. ConclusionThe treatment of antibody cocktail was closely linked to reduction in the need for further medical interventions. The result indicates that the antibody cocktail therapy is associated with reducing the strain on hospitals, which is related to the improvement of medical management for public health care in Covid-19 pandemic era.