Skin care by washing with water is not inferior to washing with a cleanser in children with atopic dermatitis in remission in summer: WASH study.

BACKGROUND: Washing with water is not inferior to washing with soaps and detergents in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission during the fall-winter seasons. We investigated whether this finding varies during summer based on the type of cleanser (soaps and detergents). METHODS: This evaluator-blinded, pragmatic, randomized, and non-inferiority study enrolled patients with AD whose eczema was controlled following regular steroid ointment application 2 days/week. For 8 ± 4 weeks, participants washed their upper and lower limbs with a cleanser on one side and with water alone on the other. Each participant chose either a weakly alkaline soap or an acidic detergent. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 ± 4. RESULTS: The data of 43 of the 47 registered participants were analyzed. The median patient age was 44 (23-99) months; 28 and 15 participants chose weakly alkaline and acidic cleansers, respectively. At week 8 ± 4, EASI scores of the water and cleanser sides were 0.00 (0.00-0.40) and 0.15 (0.00-0.40), respectively (p = 0.74). The difference between both sides was 0.00 (-0.07 to 0.14); the limits of the 95 % confidence interval did not reach the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. No difference was observed in the median Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score, number of additional steroid ointment applications, and occurrences of skin infections. There were no differences between the cleanser types in any of the results. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that washing with water was not inferior to that with a cleanser in patients with AD in the maintenance phase during summer, regardless of the type of cleanser.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome due to buckwheat: A case report.

Buckwheat is a rare causative food for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). To date, it is unknown what laboratory data patients with FPIES caused by buckwheat show. We report a 4-year-old female with FPIES caused by buckwheat and the laboratory results. Skin prick, specific IgE antibody, and basophil activation tests were negative; however, the lymphocyte stimulation test (LST) revealed a 10.2-fold increase in activation compared with the negative control. In an open-label oral food challenge (OFC) of 80 g boiled buckwheat noodles, 3 hours after ingestion, vomiting occurred four times in a 2-hour duration. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with FPIES caused by buckwheat. Her neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine were elevated after the OFC. Moreover, the patient had a positive reaction to the LST, which may theoretically be useful in diagnosing non-immunoglobulin E-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies. FPIES caused by buckwheat is rare; however, we found that the same laboratory results were observed in a comparison of FPIES cases caused by other foods.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome due to buckwheat: A case report

Buckwheat is a rare causative food for food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). To date, it is unknown what laboratory data patients with FPIES caused by buckwheat show. We report a 4-year-old female with FPIES caused by buckwheat and the laboratory results. Skin prick, specific IgE antibody, and basophil activation tests were negative; however, the lymphocyte stimulation test (LST) revealed a 10.2-fold increase in activation compared with the negative control. In an open-label oral food challenge (OFC) of 80 g boiled buckwheat noodles, 3 hours after ingestion, vomiting occurred four times in a 2-hour duration. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with FPIES caused by buckwheat. Her neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine were elevated after the OFC. Moreover, the patient had a positive reaction to the LST, which may theoretically be useful in diagnosing non-immunoglobulin E-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies. FPIES caused by buckwheat is rare; however, we found that the same laboratory results were observed in a comparison of FPIES cases caused by other foods (AU)

Pollen Food Allergy Syndrome in Japanese Children and Adolescents: Risk Factors and Pollen Sensitisation.

Pollen food allergy syndrome (PFAS) is caused by cross-reactivity with pollen; however, not all-pollen-sensitised individuals develop PFAS, and studies on the characteristics of PFAS development are limited in Japan. We investigated the prevalence and risk factors for the development of PFAS in Japanese children and adolescents sensitised to pollen and their association with pollen-specific IgE levels. The characteristics of PFAS were investigated in patients with allergies aged 3-18 years who visited Dokkyo Medical University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. Specific IgE levels for alder, Japanese cedar, ragweed, and orchard grass were measured in patients sensitised to any of the pollens. Patients were categorised into preschool (G1), elementary school (G2), and middle-high school (G3) groups. Overall, 600 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of PFAS was 8.5% in G1, 20% in G2, and 36.3% in G3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated strong associations between the risk of developing PFAS and older age (odds ratio (OR), 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.19; P < 0.001), seasonal allergy rhinitis (OR, 6.93; 95% CI, 1.59-30.34; P = 0.010), and alder sensitisation (OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 2.66-14.49; P < 0.001). Spearman's correlation revealed statistically significant positive correlation between each pollen-specific IgE level; high pollen-specific IgE levels were also a risk factor. The OR for being sensitised to all four species was 36.83 (95% CI, 8.93-151.83, P < 0.001) when compared with Japanese cedar alone. Alder was most relevant, with an alder-specific IgE level cutoff value of 2.54 UA/mL. The sensitivity was 78.9%, and the specificity was 70.9%. In conclusion, preschool children develop PFAS with alder sensitisation, and higher pollen-specific IgE levels and increased number of pollen sensitisations are risk factors for developing PFAS.

Diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin in children by skin test and drug provocation tests: A retrospective case-series study.

BACKGROUND: Skin rash often occurs upon oral administration of amoxicillin in children, due to non-immediate hypersensitivity. However, information on delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin is scarce. Moreover, the appropriate diagnostic method and actual diagnostic rate of delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin among Japanese children are unclear. We conducted intradermal tests (IDTs) and drug provocation tests (DPTs) and retrospectively investigated the proportion of children with a definitive diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. We then evaluated the characteristics of patients with a positive allergic workup. METHODS: We enrolled children referred for suspected findings of mild or moderate non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin between August 2018 and March 2020. If the IDT in the delayed phase was negative, DPT with amoxicillin (60-90 mg/kg/day) was performed for 7 days. Non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin was defined when IDT or DPT was positive. We evaluated the potential of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) to reveal hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. RESULTS: This study enrolled 27 children. Fourteen children (52%) had hypersensitivity to amoxicillin, of whom 12 had positive IDTs and two had positive DPTs. No differences in age, sex, history of allergic disease, days from oral use to symptom onset, type of rash at symptom onset, generalized rash, and DLST results were observed between the hypersensitivity and non-hypersensitivity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Examination should be performed for children with mild or moderate reactions because positive cases have no significant features and half of the suspected cases are negative.