Association of circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease in patients with various coronary risk factors.

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of adiponectin and leptin with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with various coronary risk factors. We determined serum adiponectin, leptin, and metabolic syndrome components in 104 patients (59 men and 45 women; aged 40-86 years) with various coronary risk factors at a cardiovascular out-patient clinic. Natural logarithmic transformed (ln) leptin was lower in men and smokers, and positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.59, P < 0.0001), waist circumference (r = 0.60, P < 0.0001), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) levels (r = 0.24, P < 0.02). Ln adiponectin was higher in women and nonsmokers, and was correlated with age and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients with MetS (n = 69) had significantly higher BMI, HOMA-IR, and ln leptin and lower ln adiponectin than those without Mets (Ln leptin, 2.14 ± 0.08 versus 1.30 ± 0.11; Ln adiponectin, 2.29 ± 0.06 versus 2.54 ± 0.09). In contrast, patients with coronary heart disease (CHD: n = 40) had significantly lower serum ln adiponectin concentrations than non-CHD patients (n = 64) (1.79 ± 0.12 versus 1.91 ± 0.10) as well as lower HDL-C and a higher smoking percentage. Consistent results were obtained by multivariate analyses. In conclusion, this study disclosed factors associated with the increase in serum leptin and adiponectin. Serum levels of leptin may be associated positively with MetS, whereas adiponectin levels are associated negatively with MetS and CHD, even in patients with various coronary risk factors.

Spatially and temporally different expression of osteonectin and osteopontin in the infarct zone of experimentally induced myocardial infarction in rats.

Osteonectin and osteopontin, two secreted matricellular proteins, have a variety of functions that are exerted through interaction with matrix components. These proteins appear in response to tissue injury. To test our hypothesis that osteopontin and osteonectin are expressed with spatially and temporally different patterns in myocardial infarct tissue, we investigated osteonectin and osteopontin expression in experimentally induced myocardial infarction in rats, in comparison with Type I collagen expression. Northern blotting demonstrated that osteonectin mRNA did not markedly increase on Day 2 after the infarction, but it increased on Days 7 and 14 by 1.7+/-0.12- and 1.8+/-0.01-fold compared to that in preligation hearts. In contrast, osteopontin mRNA was increased on Day 1 (41.9+/-11.3-fold increase) and on Day 2 (58.3+/-7.6-fold increase), and then it declined on Days 7 and 14 (24.8+/-9.0- and 13.5+/-4.7-fold increase, respectively). In situ hybridization revealed that osteonectin mRNA signals were observed in fibroblasts, myofibroblasts and macrophages around infarct necrotic tissue on Days 7 and 14. Osteopontin mRNA signals were observed in macrophages in the infarct marginal zone on Day 2. Immunopositive staining for both osteonectin and osteopontin showed the same pattern as that obtained by in situ hybridization. The time course of osteonectin mRNA was almost parallel with that of Type I collagen mRNA, while that of osteopontin was not. These results demonstrated spatially and temporally different expression patterns of osteonectin and osteopontin in myocardial infarction and suggest that osteonectin appears to be involved in the pathological course in the late phase after infarction concomitantly with Type I collagen, while osteopontin may play a role in the early phase.