[The Ludwigshafen Osteoporosis Screening Questionnaire (LOS Questionnaire): result of the evaluation of anamnestic risk factors in osteoporosis diagnostics]. / Ludwigshafener Osteoporosescreeningbogen (LOS-Bogen) : Resultat aus der Evaluation anamnestischer Risikofaktoren in der Osteoporosediagnostik.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a major health problem worldwide and is included in the WHO list of the top ten major diseases. However, it is often undiagnosed until the first fracture occurs, due to inadequate patient education and lack of insurance coverage for screening tests. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In our study of 78 patients with metaphyseal long bone fractures, we searched for a correlation between anamnestic risk factors, bone-specific laboratory values, and the bone morphogenic density (BMD). Each indicator was examined as a possible diagnostic instrument for osteoporosis. The secondary aim of this study was to demonstrate the high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with metaphyseal fractures. RESULTS: Of our fracture patients 76.9% had decreased bone density and 43.6% showed manifest osteoporosis in DXA (densitometry) measurements. Our modified LOS Questionnaire, identifying anamnestic risk factors, correlated highly significantly (p=0.01) with reduced BMD, whereas seven bone-specific laboratory values (p=0.046) correlated significantly. CONCLUSION: Anamnestic risk factors correlate with pathological BMD more than bone-specific laboratory values. The LOS Questionnaire used in this study would therefore function as a cost-effective primary diagnostic instrument for identification of osteoporosis patients.

Characteristics of bone metabolism markers during the healing of osteoporotic versus nonosteoporotic metaphyseal long bone fractures: a matched pair analysis.

PURPOSE: The activity and metabolism of fracture healing can be monitored quantitatively by measuring bone turnover markers (BTMs) in serum or urine. However, in osteoporotic bone, the exact metabolism processes during the healing of metaphyseal fractures remain unknown. There is no diagnostic approach which currently allows dynamic insight into the fracture healing processes in order to monitor the progression of healing and to assist in therapeutic decision making. METHODS: Between March 2007 and February 2009, 30 patients over 50 years of age who suffered a metaphyseal fracture were included in our study. The levels of the osteoanabolic marker BAP (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and osteocatabolic marker ß-CTX [crosslinked C-(CTX)-telopeptide-of-type-I-collagen] were monitored during the fracture healing of osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fractures for a duration of 8 weeks. RESULTS: After an initial decrease of BAP in the first week, the BAP level steadily increased through the fourth week in both groups. The levels of BAP in the osteoporotic group surpassed the healthy group. ß-CTX steadily increased in healthy bone up to the fourth week; in osteoporotic bone, ß-CTX first increased and, thereafter, decreased from the first week onwards. CONCLUSIONS: In this work, the first molecular biological aspects of osteoporotic fracture healing have been uncovered, helping to explain the mechanisms of delayed fracture healing in osteoporotic bone. The early decrease of reduced ß-CTX as well as elevated BAP during the healing process may be the first aspects within the delayed healing of osteoporotic bone. Further studies are necessary in order to achieve more detailed insight to fracture healing and to ascertain the progression of fracture healing as being essential (criteria) for therapeutic decision making.