Chromosome 9p deletions in invasive and noninvasive nonfunctional pituitary adenomas: the deleted region involves markers outside of the MTS1 and MTS2 genes.

We have screened 57 cases of primary, nonfunctional, pituitary adenomas for loss of heterozygosity of markers on chromosome 9p. Using a panel of 11 microsatellite markers, we found hemizygous deletion with at least one of the markers in 18 tumors (31.5%). The frequency of loss was similar in both noninvasive (8 of 26; 31%) and invasive tumors (10 of 31; 32%), suggesting that loss on this chromosome might be an early event in pituitary tumorigenesis. Two discrete areas of loss were punctuated by a region of retention of heterozygosity between the markers D9S171 and IFNA, indicative of homozygous deletion. However, multiplex PCR analysis (MTS1 and MTS2) and the presence of a 3' untranslated region polymorphism in MTS1 suggested that neither of these tumor suppressor genes was homozygously deleted. In 6 of the 18 tumors showing LOH, sufficient DNA was also available for Southern blot analysis and, in all cases, showed retention of MTS1. Cell mixing experiments of tumor cell DNA homozygously deleted for MTS1 with DNA in which neither copy of the gene was deleted only gave rise to a signal at contamination levels greater than 30% and could discriminate homozygous and hemizygous loss. These studies support the recent findings that mechanisms other than hemi- and homozygous deletion are most likely responsible for the loss of MTS1 gene product in pituitary tumors (M. Woloschak et al., Cancer Res., 56: 2493-2486, 1996.). These data show that losses on either side of 9p21-22, both or either of which may be deleted, are involved in pituitary tumorigenesis and provide evidence for distinct suppressor gene loci, in addition to MTS1, on chromosome 9p.

Allelic deletion in pituitary adenomas reflects aggressive biological activity and has potential value as a prognostic marker.

Tumors of the pituitary gland are usually benign adenomas and account for 10% of all intracranial neoplasms. Five pituitary tumors have previously been reported to harbor multiple allelic deletions. Of these, three displayed particularly aggressive biological behavior, whereas there were no clinical details provided for the others. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that genetic deletions are a marker of invasive behavior and to identify the loci most commonly involved. Accordingly, we studied two cohorts of pituitary tumors, classified radiologically as invasive or noninvasive, for loss of heterozygosity (LOH). There is a significantly higher frequency of LOH in invasive tumors (10.8% of all loci examined) compared to noninvasive tumors (2.4%; P < 0.001). Of the 11 loci investigated, 75% of the allelic deletions identified in invasive tumors were found at 4 loci: 11q13, 13q12-14, 10q, and 1p. Twenty of 47 invasive tumors had evidence of at least 1 allelic deletion, whereas 14 of 20 had more than 1. Of the 6 tumors with only 1 deletion, 5 involved the 11q13 locus, suggesting that this is an early change in the transition from noninvasive to invasive adenoma. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive tumors demonstrates a significantly higher frequency of deletions affecting 11q13 (P < 0.001), 13q12-14 (P < 0.05), and 10q26 (P < 0.05) in invasive tumors. In addition, allelic deletion correlates with increasingly invasive behavior (modified Hardy classification), as 73% of grade 4 tumors compared to 33% of grade 3 and 9.5% of grade 1 and 2 tumors demonstrated LOH at any locus. Furthermore, in some tumors we identified a breakpoint between markers intragenic and extragenic to the retinoblastoma gene (Rb1) on chromosome 13q, suggesting that tumor suppressor genes other than or in addition to Rb1 may be involved in pituitary tumorigenesis. This was further supported by the presence of Rb protein in two of four tumors where the genetic loss extended to include the intragenic marker D13S153. Early identification of tumors with likely invasive potential by means of genetic analysis (LOH) may provide useful information on potential tumor behavior and aid tumor management in a manner that is not possible using routine histological methods. A large prospective study is required in patients without radiological evidence of invasion to assess the value of LOH in predicting outcome and for planning treatment.