A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access.

BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional open surgery, minimally invasive catheter-based procedures have less post procedural complications. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) require large bore arterial access. Optimal site management of large bore arterial access is pivotal to reduce the hospital-acquired complications associated with large bore arterial access. We wanted to compare surgical cutdown versus percutaneous closure devices in site management of large bore arterial access. METHODS: Participants planned for TAVI or EVAR with large bore arterial access more than 10 French were included, while participants with history of bypass surgery, malignancies, thrombophilia, or sepsis were excluded. A consecutive sample of 100 participants (mean age 74.66 ± 2.65 years, 61% males) was selected, underwent TAVI or EVAR with surgical cutdown (group 1) versus TAVI or EVAR with Proglide™ percutaneous closure device (group 2). RESULTS: The incidence rate of hematoma was significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (p = 0.014), the mean procedure time (minutes) and the median hospital stay (days) were significantly higher in group 1 versus group 2 (t(98) = - 2.631, p = 0.01, and U = 2.403, p = 0.018, respectively), and the c-reactive protein pre-procedure and the c-reactive protein post-procedure were significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (U = -2.969, p = 0.003, and U = -2.674, p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a lower incidence rate of large bore arterial access complications as hematoma, a shorter procedure time, and a shorter hospital stay with percutaneous closure devices compared to surgical cutdown.

Impact of right ventricular lead position on left ventricular functions and early remodeling in permanent single- and dual-chamber pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing can induce both interventricular dyssynchrony and intraventricular dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony after long-term RV apical pacing is associated with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and deterioration in functional capacity. AIM: We aimed to identify the short-term effects of the pacemaker RV lead position on remodeling of LV systolic functions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients who presented with an indication of permanent pacing and who underwent permanent single- or dual-chamber pacemaker insertion: 15 patients with RV apical pacing (RV apex), and 15 patients with non-apical pacing (mid-septal). The two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking imaging technique was used for quantification of global longitudinal function of the left ventricle and dyssynchrony evaluation before pacemaker implantation and after a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: At the 3­month follow-up, post-pacing 2D speckle tracking echocardiography revealed impairment of global longitudinal strain in all patients and intraventricular dyssynchrony was significantly increased in the apical location compared with the non-apical location (radial dyssynchrony: 108.67 ± 11.68 ms vs. 80.53 ± 8.17 ms, p < 0.001) with a greater difference (50.53 ± 13.30 ms) in the apical location than in the non-apical location (29.87 ± 6.64 ms, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the short-term follow-up, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography showed more radial dyssynchrony in the apical location than in the non-apical location of RV lead. The RV septal pacing is a better alternative in terms of less dyssynchrony compared to RV apical pacing. Older age, higher percentage of pacing, and device type are prognostic factors for development of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.