Can we develop consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of primary shoulder arthroplasty? A study protocol using a real-time Delphi technique among expert clinicians in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty incidence is projected to continue its exponential growth and the resultant burden of monitoring patients with shoulder arthroplasty implants creates significant pressure on orthopaedic services. Surveillance offers the opportunity to study implant longevity, detect failing implants and potentially perform revision at lower morbidity and cost. There is a paucity of evidence to support recommendations on long-term follow-up in shoulder arthroplasty. Prospective studies comparing long-term follow-up and structure are impractical from time, resource and cost perspectives. A real-time Delphi technique represents a mechanism by which experts involved in long-term follow-up of primary shoulder arthroplasty can formulate recommendations via a transparent, reproducible and efficient process. We outline the protocol for a real-time Delphi study seeking consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of primary shoulder arthroplasty . METHODS: A real-time Delphi technique will be used. A planning committee will design the Delphi statements. A steering committee will supervise and monitor the real-time Delphi process. Participants will be asked to rate their agreement with statements using a 5-point Likert scale. The Delphi statements will be derived from review of published literature, and the strength of evidence available for each statement will be provided. We will offer participation to all surgeons and extended-scope practitioners who are current members of the British Elbow & Shoulder Society (BESS) and have clinical practice involving shoulder arthroplasty follow-up. The questionnaire will be active for 4 weeks and requires a minimum of 20 participants. Consensus agreement is defined as 70% of participants selecting at least a 4-point on a 5-point Likert scale. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the outlined study will achieve consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of primary shoulder arthroplasty. We intend to use the expert consensus recommendations achieved, in addition to the limited applicable published evidence available, to produce BESS-affiliated guidelines on long-term follow-up and surveillance of primary shoulder arthroplasty.EthicsEthical approval is not required for the real-time Delphi study.We expect the results of this initiative will be published in a peer-reviewed, high-impact journal.

Discovery Elbow System arthroplasty polyethylene bearing exchange: outcomes and experience.

BACKGROUND: The Discovery Elbow System (DES) utilizes a polyethylene bearing within the ulnar component. An exchange bearing requires preoperative freezing and implantation within 2 minutes of freezer removal to allow insertion. We report our outcomes and experience using this technique. METHODS: This was an analysis of a two-surgeon consecutive series of DES bearing exchange. Inclusion criteria included patients in which exchange was attempted with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic review was performed 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 10 years postoperative. Outcome measures included range of movement, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), complications and requirement for revision surgery. RESULTS: Eleven DESs in 10 patients were included. Indications were bearing wear encountered during humeral component revision (n=5); bearing failure (n=4); and infection treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR; n=2). Bearing exchange was conducted on the first attempt in 10 cases. One case required a second attempt. One patient developed infection postoperatively managed with two-stage revision. Mean follow-up of the bearing exchange DES was 3 years. No further surgery was required, with no infection recurrence in DAIR cases. Mean elbow flexion-extension and pronosupination arcs were 107° (±22°) and 140° (±26°). Mean OES was 36/48 (±12) and MEPS was 83/100 (±19). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of DES bearing exchange in cases of bearing wear with well-fixed stems or acute infection. This series provides surgeons managing DES arthroplasty with management principles, successful and reproducible surgical techniques and expected clinical outcomes in performing DES polyethylene bearing exchange. Level of evidence: IV.

Does long-term follow-up and monitoring of primary shoulder arthroplasty identify failing implants requiring revision?

BACKGROUND: Published scoping review has identified evidence paucity related to long-term follow-up of shoulder arthroplasty. We aim to report effectiveness of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty surveillance in identifying failing implants requiring revision. METHODS: A prospective database recording shoulder arthroplasty and subsequent follow-up surveillance in a shoulder unit was analyzed. Shoulder arthroplasty was performed by 4 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons for accepted elective indications including the use of anatomic arthroplasty in arthritic shoulders with intact rotator cuff and a reverse prosthesis being used in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders and rotator cuff-competent arthritic shoulders when deemed preferable by the treating surgeon. All shoulder arthroplasty implants used had achieved a minimum 7A Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating. The included shoulder arthroplasties were performed between May 1, 2004, and December 31, 2021, with minimum 1-year follow-up. Surveillance program involves specialist physiotherapist review at 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 15 years postoperatively, including clinical examination, outcome scoring, and radiographs. Patient-initiated review occurred between time points if a patient requested assessment because of symptoms. Outcome measures include ratio of failing implants identified by surveillance and patient-initiated review, with number of surveillance reviews offered and proportion that identified a failing implant requiring revision calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1002 elective primary shoulder arthroplasty with minimum 1-year follow-up were performed (547 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [rTSA], 234 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [aTSA], and 221 hemiarthroplasty [HA]). A total of 238 patients died prior to December 31, 2022, resulting in 4019 surveillance appointments offered. Thirty-eight prostheses required revision ≥1 year postoperatively (6 rTSA, 9 aTSA, and 23 HA), with surveillance identifying requirement in 53% (33% rTSA, 56% aTSA, and 57% HA) and patient-initiated review in 47%. Mean years from implantation to revision was 5.2 (2.7 rTSA, 3.6 aTSA, and 6.6 HA). Revision indications included rotator cuff failure (56% aTSR and 43% HA) and glenoid erosion (57% HA). CONCLUSION: This is the first series reporting effectiveness of shoulder arthroplasty surveillance in identifying implants requiring revision. Surveillance identified more than half of implants requiring revision, although only 0.5% of appointments identified revision requirement. Surveillance enrolment may influence patient-initiated review utilization; therefore, similar studies using only patient-initiated follow-up would help inform recommendations.

In situ synthesis of g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx nano-heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic H2 generation via water splitting.

Herein, we demonstrated the in situ synthesis of g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx nano-heterostructures for hydrogen generation under UV visible light irradiation. The formation of the g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx nano-heterostructures was confirmed via powder X-ray diffraction and supported by XPS. The FE-SEM images indicated the formation of layered structures of MXene and g-C3N4. HR-TEM images and SAED patterns confirmed the presence of g-C3N4 together with Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, i.e., the formation of nano-heterostructures of g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx. The absorption spectra clearly showed the distinct band gaps of g-C3N4 and Ti3C2Tx in the nano-heterostructure. The increase in PL intensity and broadening of the peak with an increase in g-C3N4 indicated the suppression of electron-hole recombination. Furthermore, the nano-heterostructure was used as a photocatalyst for H2 generation from water and methylene blue dye degradation. The highest H2 evolution (1912.25 µmol/0.1 g) with good apparent quantum yield (3.1%) and an efficient degradation of MB were obtained for gCT-0.75, which was much higher compared to that of the pristine materials. The gCT-0.75 nano-heterostructure possessed a high surface area and abundant vacancy defects, facilitating the separation of charge carriers, which was ultimately responsible for this high photocatalytic activity. Additionally, TRPL clearly showed a higher decay time, which supports the enhancement in the photocatalytic activity of the gCT-0.75 nano-heterostructure. The nano-heterostructure with the optimum concentration of g-C3N4 formed a hetero-junction with the linked catalytic system, which facilitated efficient charge carrier separation also responsible for the enhanced photocatalytic activity.

Scoping review: Evidence for long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty.

Aims: Long-term follow-up and monitoring of asymptomatic shoulder and elbow arthroplasty remains contentious, with a wide spectrum of non-evidence-based mechanisms used. This scoping review aims to outline related evidence, thereby informing research requirements. Methods: Studies relevant to shoulder and elbow arthroplasty follow-up, surveillance and time-related failure were included. The review included randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and economic studies indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CDSR and Cochrane CENTRAL since 1 January 2012. In addition, all registry studies, follow-up studies, cohort studies and case reports indexed in MEDLINE since 1 January 2020 were included. The screening was undertaken by two reviewers. Key characteristics of each study were described, alongside a narrative review. Results: Twenty-one articles were included. We were unable to identify evidence that long-term follow-up and monitoring of asymptomatic shoulder and elbow arthroplasty identifies failure or leads to a revision that is of reduced patient morbidity and cost. In addition, no evidence was apparent to inform whether patients will self-present with a failing implant. Several surveillance mechanisms were identified. Conclusion: This scoping review highlights the paucity of evidence related to long-term follow-up and monitoring of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, and the need for high-quality data to inform the development of evidence-based care pathways.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.

Aims: Multiple studies have shown excellent clinical results in primary rotator cuff repairs; however, not much evidence is available in the literature on the outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repairs. The purpose of this study was to report a cohort of patients who underwent revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and identify factors that may influence its outcomes. Methods: We examined a cohort of 62 patients which underwent revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a single UK institution with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. Active shoulder movements including forward flexion, abduction and external rotation were evaluated, as well as Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Further subgroup analysis was performed looking of the effects of age, size of tear, obesity and diabetes mellitus had on clinical outcomes. Results: 59 patients were available for final review. 39 male and 23 were female. The mean age was 64 years. Overall, significant improvements were seen in terms of OSS (p < 0.05), active forward flexion (p < 0.05), active abduction (p < 0.05) and active external rotation (p < 0.05). Our study showed that a significant proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair achieve good outcomes. Repairing small- and medium-size tears was successful, diabetics had no post-operative improvements, obese patients achieved significant improvement in range of movement and age was not a predictor of surgical success. Conclusion: Overall, arthroscopic revision surgery is a successful option; however, appropriate patient selection and counselling is paramount.

Mid- to long-term outcomes of a cemented, all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate mid- to long-term survival of an all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component used in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The secondary aim was to review clinical and radiologic outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected local arthroplasty register of consecutive patients undergoing TSA with an all-polyethylene pegged glenoid between January 2009 and December 2018 was undertaken. In total, 108 TSAs using this implant were performed in our unit in 98 patients (18 men and 80 women), with 10 patients undergoing bilateral TSA. The mean age at the time of the operation was 71.3 years (range, 44-87 years). The mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 2-10.6 years). In addition to survival analysis, clinical evaluation included the postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, as well as range-of-motion assessment. Radiologic outcomes included an assessment of radiolucency based on the Lazarus grade. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a 6-year survival estimate of 94.1% for all-cause revision. Revision was required in 6 patients: 4 for cuff failure and 2 for instability. At follow-up, the mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 38.2 (standard deviation [SD], 12.3); mean Constant score, 59.3 (SD, 17.0); and mean VAS pain score, 1.8 (SD, 2.5). Mean forward elevation at final follow-up was 111° (SD, 26.6°); mean abduction, 102° (SD, 34.0°). Clinical outcomes were maintained at long-term follow-up (>8 years), with the exception of the VAS pain score, which increased by 2.1 points (P = .034). Radiologic assessment revealed that 28 patients had radiolucency consistent with Lazarus grade ≥ 3 with clinical outcomes not being affected. CONCLUSIONS: Mid- to long-term follow-up indicates a low revision rate and good clinical survivorship for cemented, all-polyethylene glenoid components. No patients, so far, have undergone revision for glenoid loosening, but radiographic follow-up has shown that 36% of these implants have signs of radiolucency. Further follow-up is required to determine longer-term survivorship.

Surgical fixation of isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus- systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was undertaken based on PRISMA guidelines to study the results of surgical treatment of Greater Tuberosity fractures of the Humerus by different techniques (Open, Percutaneous or Arthroscopic) and using different fixation devices (Sutures, Screws and Plates). DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were performed for studies in English on four online databases (MEDLINE®, Embase®, Ovid® Emcare and CINAHL®) using a pre-planned search strategy. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were screened against pre-decided inclusion and exclusion criteria. 24 articles were eligible for inclusion involving 562 patients in all. DATA EXTRACTION: A template was used for collection of relevant data regarding the study design, demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical techniques and implants used, outcomes, complications and re-operations. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Coleman Methodology Score. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pooled analysis was conducted for (1) complications/reoperations of different devices; and (2) reported results using standard outcome measures of various techniques. Results were pooled using inverse variance method. When pooling proportions, we used arcsine transformation to account for zero events. CONCLUSION: Use of screws was associated with higher rates of total complications (23.7%) as well as reoperations (13.2%), compared to sutures (14.2%; 2.6%) and plates (10.6%; 4.1%). In a subgroup analysis, use of low-profile plates (LPPs) was associated with the lowest rates of total complications (4.97%). The superiority of any surgical technique could not be established using the pooled Constant or ASES scores because there was lack of uniformity in the reporting of outcome measures. Our analysis of complications of the various fixation devices dissuades the use of screws and favours the use of low-profile plates. There is a need for prospective studies comparing arthroscopic suture fixation with open low-profile plate fixation of GT fractures.

Two-Stage Primary Arthroplasty in the Infected Native Knee: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The knee is the commonest native joint to develop an infection. A two-stage primary knee replacement, with an interim stage of debridement and cement spacer application, modelled after two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) has been reported for the management of chronic infections. AIMS: To systematically review the literature to find the infection-free survival and outcomes of this operation and explore its indications. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. A systematic search of 4 online databases was conducted on 9/8/2020. After reviewing 226 abstracts and applying our selection criteria, 10 papers were selected for full-text review, and 9 included in the final synthesis. RESULTS: On pooled analysis, an infection-free survival of 95.6% (CI 94.7-96.4) was found at 2 years in 139 knees, which was unchanged over the remainder of the follow-up (Mean 3.9 years). The complication rate after final implantation was 6% in those that did not develop reinfection. The mean pooled Knee Society Score (KSS) and KSS Function score among 70 patients (4 papers) was 83.4 (80.1-89.0) and 76.8 (71.5-78.0), respectively. The mean range of motion among 82 patients (6 papers) was more than 100°. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage primary knee replacement is a safe, effective and reliable procedure with good results in the short to medium term. Further studies are required to lay down precise indications and cost-effectiveness of this procedure, in comparison to other strategies for chronic infection. All joint registries should develop methods to identify patients undergoing two-stage procedures, to understand their long-term survival and outcomes.

Introduction of an enhanced recovery programme for total shoulder arthroplasty: report of a novel pathway.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery (ER) programmes are well established in hip and knee arthroplasty, but are not yet commonplace for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study analyses the effect of implementing an ER programme with TSA, on length of stay (LOS), functional outcome and patient satisfaction. LOCAL PROBLEM: No established programme applying ER to the specifics of upper-limb arthroplasty existed at our unit. METHODS: A three-cycle plan-do-study-act quality improvement methodology was applied, involving development of our multifactorial programme, a pilot phase and wider roll-out. A consecutive series of patients who underwent TSA and were enrolled in an ER programme were compared with a matched control group of consecutive patients who underwent TSA in the year before the programme started. For all patients, LOS as well as mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant Score (CS) were quantified and patient satisfaction assessed. INTERVENTIONS: A dedicated multidisciplinary team led preoperative class involving patient education, advice and occupational therapy assessment. A standardised perioperative anaesthetic regime based on regional anaesthetic techniques with preoperative analgesic and nutritional loading was introduced. Postoperative rehabilitation was also standardised with slings for comfort only and early safe-zone mobilisation. New patient information was developed. RESULTS: 71 patients were included in matched cohorts. Mean LOS was reduced from 2.4 nights to 1.9 nights. The single night stay rate improved from 40% to 49%. Across the ER cohort, 15 less nights were required to complete same volume of surgeries as in the non-ER cohort.Parity in OSS and CS measured at 3 and 12 months after surgery were observed in both cohorts.Satisfaction was already high before ER but scores stayed the same or improved across all areas surveyed.Absolute complication rates of 9.9% in the non-ER group and 7% in the ER group were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our ER programme benefited patients and the Trust by reducing time in hospital and improving patient satisfaction without an adverse effect on complication rate.

Minimum five-year outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a trabecular metal glenoid base plate.

AIMS: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using trabecular metal (TM)-backed glenoid implants has been introduced with the aim to increase implant survival. Only short-term reports on the outcomes of TM-RTSA have been published to date. We aim to present the seven-year survival of TM-backed glenoid implants along with minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: All consecutive elective RTSAs performed at a single centre between November 2008 and October 2014 were reviewed. Patients who had primary TM-RTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy and osteoarthritis with deficient cuff were included. A total of 190 shoulders in 168 patients (41 male, 127 female) were identified for inclusion at a mean of 7.27 years (SD 1.4) from surgery. The primary outcome was survival of the implant with all-cause revision and aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints. Secondary outcomes were clinical, radiological, and patient-related outcomes with a five-year minimum follow-up. RESULTS: The implant was revised in ten shoulders (5.2%) with a median time to revision of 21.2 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9.9 to 41.8). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate at seven years was 95.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.7 to 98; 35 RTSAs at risk) for aseptic mechanical failure of the glenoid and 94.8% (95% CI 77.5 to 96.3; 35 RTSAs at risk) for all-cause revision. Minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes were available for 103 and 98 RTSAs respectively with a median follow-up time of six years (IQR 5.2 to 7.0). Median postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score was 38 (IQR 31 to 45); median Constant and Murley score was 60 (IQR 47.5 to 70); median forward flexion 115° (IQR 100° to 125°); median abduction 95° (IQR 80° to 120°); and external rotation 25° (IQR 15° to 40°) Scapular notching was seen in 62 RTSAs (63.2%). CONCLUSION: We present the largest and longest-term series of TM-backed glenoid implants demonstrating 94.8% all-cause survivorship at seven years. Specifically pertaining to glenoid loosening, survival of the implant increased to 95.9%. In addition, we report satisfactory minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1333-1338.

The flail elbow: Every surgeon's nightmare.

A flail elbow joint has an excessive or abnormal degree of mobility resulting in loss of function. Such a situation can arise from structural damage or loss of neuromuscular control. Structural damage may be in terms of loss of integrity of bony, ligamentous, or both components, and this is commonly caused by trauma, failed arthroplasty, infections - either in the native joint or associated with the above, or inflammatory arthritides. Arm paralysis from any cause may also leads to a loss of muscle control making the elbow flail. The management of the condition varies according to etiology; and concurrent issues like infection and instability need to be addressed in addition to the structural problems. Treatment can be non-surgical with the use of orthotics to support the elbow, and maybe more appropriate in certain circumstances. Surgical treatment can involve fixation, repair or reconstruction. Often the deficiency is not amenable to these methods and arthroplasty has to be considered. The situation becomes more fraught in case of failure of arthroplasty and/or infection, where reconstruction can be challenging. In this review we have considered diverse clinical scenarios that fall under this broad umbrella, with a focus on those encountered commonly in practice.

Primary open elbow arthrolysis in post-traumatic elbow stiffness - A comparison of outcomes in severity of elbow injury.

PURPOSE: Stiffness is a sequelae of elbow trauma. Arthrolysis may be considered to increase range of movement (ROM). Little is published on the outcomes/complications of elbow arthrolysis. We present our series of primary open arthrolysis in posttraumatic elbow stiffness. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients that underwent primary open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness in our unit (2011-2018) were analysed. All procedures were performed by an elbow surgeon. Postoperative rehabilitation followed protocol with early motion; continuous passive motion (CPM) was utilised if requested. Data collected included patient demographics, traumatic injury type, arthrolysis technique, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elbow ROM, complications and postoperative Oxford Elbow Score (OES). RESULTS: 41 patients were included. 59% were male. Mean age at time of arthrolysis was 43 years (range 12-79 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 53 months (range 8-100 months). Median duration from time of injury to arthrolysis was 11 months (range 2-553 months). Mean preoperative flexion-extension arc (FEA) was 70°, improving to 104° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean preoperative pronosupination arc (PSA) was 125°, improving to 165° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean postoperative OES was 37 (n = 28). Complication rate was 24% with 7 recurrence requiring surgery, 2 nerve injuries and 1 infection. CPM, 10 patients, saw mean FEA improvement of 56°. Mean PSA improvement was 36°. Complication rate for these patients was 40%. Severe traumatic injury was associated with increased preoperative stiffness (FEA 61° vs 84°, PSA 111° vs 149°) but larger improvements in ROM (postoperative FEA 98° [p < 0.001], PSA 165° [p < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates improvement in elbow ROM following open arthrolysis with significantly higher gain in pronosupination for those withsevere injury. Moderate results were seen in a patient reported outcome measure. Patients considering arthrolysis should be counselled regarding expectations/complication rate.

Rising to the challenge: medical students as Doctors' Assistants; an evaluation of a new clinical role.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 Pandemic brought clinical placements to a halt for many UK medical students. A University Hospitals Trust offered clinical phase students the opportunity to support the National Health Service (NHS) in newly defined roles as Doctors' Assistants (DAs). This study evaluates the experience of students working in a single NHS Trust. To our knowledge, this is the first report of medical students' perspectives on taking up a novel clinical role in the UK. METHODS: An anonymised novel electronic survey was sent to all 40 DAs across a single University Hospitals Trust via email to determine student perceptions of several aspects of the role, including its value to learning and development, impact on well-being, and benefit to the clinical environment. A formal statistical analysis was not required. RESULTS: Of the total cohort participating in the programme, 32 DAs responded (80% response rate). The experience was considered valuable to multiple aspects of learning and development, particularly familiarisation with the role of a Foundation doctor. Levels of confidence in training and support were high, and most DAs felt valued as part of the clinical team, and experienced no mental health issues resulting from their role. 53% of the participants felt their work was necessary or valuable to the team, and all reported a positive experience overall. CONCLUSION: A new role allowed medical students to effectively provide clinical assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. This provided immediate support to clinical teams as well as learning opportunities for the participants without detriment to their mental well-being, and could be a model for effective retention of medical students in clinical environments in the face of resurgence of COVID-19.

Mid- to long-term survivorship of the cemented, semiconstrained Discovery total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is increasing, and an improved understanding of elbow kinematics and biomaterials has driven advances in implant design. In modern practice, cemented, semiconstrained devices are most frequently used. The Discovery TEA has demonstrated promising early results, although there are a paucity of follow-up studies and no dedicated mid- to long-term series. We therefore present the longest, most complete such study to date. METHODS: A prospectively maintained local joint registry was interrogated to yield a consecutive series of Discovery TEAs performed at a single non-design center. The minimum follow-up period was set at 5 years. Revision procedures and TEAs performed for acute trauma were excluded. The primary outcome was survivorship of the implant. The secondary outcomes included clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 67 TEAs in 58 patients for inclusion at a mean of 98.5 ± 20.4 months from surgery. Four cases (6%) were lost to follow-up, and implant survival was censored accordingly. The implant was revised in 14 cases (20.9%). The Kaplan-Meier method showed an implant survivorship rate of 76.8% at 119 months. A significant difference in survival was found between dominant and nondominant elbows (P = .012, Breslow test), with elbow dominance conferring a 4.5-fold increased risk of revision (relative risk, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-18.5). Pooled clinical outcomes (70.9% follow-up at minimum of 60 months and median of 77.8 months) were also determined. CONCLUSIONS: We present the longest-term and most complete single-center follow-up study of the Discovery TEA to date. Further long-term survival studies are required to elucidate the performance of this implant compared with more established designs. We have also demonstrated differences in implant survivorship owing to hand dominance for the first time.

Predicting the Behavior of Humeral Shaft Fractures: An Independent Validation Study of the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral Fractures and Value of Assessing Fracture Mobility.

OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) and to quantify the predictive relationship of fracture motion on physical examination to nonunion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single institutional center (University teaching hospital). PATIENTS: Ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing nonoperative treatment of a diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture were identified over a 4-year period. The average age of the population was 62 years and 42% of the cohort was men. INTERVENTION: Clinical examination for fracture stability was routinely performed on patients by the treating physicians. Radiographic assessment of fracture callus (RUSHU score) at 6 weeks was retrospectively determined. Patients were followed up until union. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Stability was graded as motion at the fracture site or the humerus moving as a single functional unit. RESULTS: Fractures with a RUSHU score ≤7 were 14 times more likely to proceed to nonunion at 6 months (78% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The time to union was 49 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≤7 versus 16 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≥8. The number of operations needed to avoid one nonunion was 1.7. Fractures mobile at 6 weeks were 6.5 times more likely to proceed to nonunion at 6 months (77% specificity, 67% sensitivity). Mobile fractures had a longer time to union (41 weeks) than nonmobile fractures (17 weeks). CONCLUSION: The RUSHU score and clinical assessment of fracture mobility are effective and valid tools in identifying patients at risk of developing nonunion of humeral shaft fractures and can enhance early decision making in fracture management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Protocol for a multi-site pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial: Surgery versus PhysiothErapist-leD exercise for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff (the SPeEDy study).

BACKGROUND: Clinically, a distinction is made between types of rotator cuff tear, traumatic and non-traumatic, and this sub-classification currently informs the treatment pathway. It is currently recommended that patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears are fast tracked for surgical opinion. However, there is uncertainty about the most clinically and cost-effective intervention for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears and further research is required. SPeEDy will assess the feasibility of a fully powered, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the hypothesis that, compared to surgical repair (and usual post-operative rehabilitation), a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise is not clinically inferior, but is more cost-effective for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears. METHODS: SPeEDy is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility RCT with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and further qualitative investigation of patient experience. A total of 76 patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears will be recruited from approximately eight UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either surgical repair and usual post-operative rehabilitation or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise. The QRI is a mixed-methods approach that includes data collection and analysis of screening logs, audio recordings of recruitment consultations, interviews with patients and clinicians involved in recruitment, and review of study documentation as a basis for developing action plans to address identified difficulties whilst recruitment to the RCT is underway. A further sample of patient participants will be purposively sampled from both intervention groups and interviewed to explore reasons for initial participation, treatment acceptability, reasons for non-completion of treatment, where relevant, and any reasons for treatment crossover. DISCUSSION: Research to date suggests that there is uncertainty regarding the most clinically and cost-effective interventions for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears. There is a clear need for a high-quality, fully powered, RCT to better inform clinical practice. Prior to this, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility RCT to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and number of and reasons for treatment crossover. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04027205 ) - Registered on 19 July 2019. Available via.

6-Year clinical results and survival of Copeland Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in a consecutive series of 279 cases.

BACKGROUND: Medium-term clinical results and survival of the Copeland resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder (CRHA) in a large consecutive group are presented with a comparison of outcomes for underlying pathologies. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing CRHA over 14 years was retrospectively analysed with no exclusions. Patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up by an independent assessor. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Pain and satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue score. RESULTS: 279 CRHAs were performed in 242 patients between 2002 and 2016. The mean follow-up was 6 years. The indication for surgery was osteoarthritis (OA) in 212, inflammatory arthropathy (RA) in 35, rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) in 22 and avascular necrosis (AVN) in 2. For the OA group, 5-year survival was 90%, 10-year survival was 83% and mean survival was 13.2 years (95% CI 12.5-13.9). The mean OSS was 35.0 and mean CMS 49.9. CRHA for CTA had significantly poorer (p < 0.001) 5-year survival (55%), 10-year survival (41%) and mean survival (5.9 years, 95% CI 4.7-7.2). Mean OSS was 23.6 and mean CMS 30.3, which was poorer than for OA (p < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of OA patients found significantly better survival (p = 0.013) in those aged over 65 years but no difference in functional outcome. CONCLUSION: CRHA remains a reasonable option for OA in patients with an intact rotator cuff and with sufficient bone stock, especially in those aged over 65 years. With poorer functional outcomes and survival, CRHA should not be offered in those with CTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective comparative study).

Management of tennis elbow: a survey of UK clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Tennis elbow is a common condition in the UK but there are no guidelines on how best to manage the condition. The purpose of the present study was to establish the current UK practice in managing patients with chronic tennis elbow. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of UK surgeons and therapists was conducted in June 2017. RESULTS: In total, 275 responses were received, the majority from consultant surgeons and experienced physiotherapists. In total, 81% recommended exercise-based physiotherapy as the first-line intervention. Second-line treatments varied widely, with corticosteroid injections being the most popular (27%), followed by shockwave therapy, platelet-rich plasma injection, surgery, acupuncture and a wait-and-see policy. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability of treatments offered when physiotherapy fails patients with tennis elbow. The majority of second-line interventions lack evidence to support their use and, in the case of corticosteroid injections, may even be harmful in the long term. There is a clear need for national guidance based on best evidence to aid clinicians in their treatment approach.