Association of Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation with In-hospital Outcomes and 30-day Readmission After Inpatient Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Knowledge of the impact of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation on in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmission remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates among patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who were hospitalized for AF ablation. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years with AF who were hospitalized and underwent catheter ablation during 2017-2020. Then, we compared the in-hospital procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. Our study included 7310 index admissions for paroxysmal AF ablation and 9179 index admissions for persistent AF ablation. According to our analysis, there was no significant difference in procedural complications-namely, cerebrovascular accident, vascular complications, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, phrenic nerve palsy, pericardial complications, and systemic embolization-between the persistent and paroxysmal AF groups. There was also no significant difference in early mortality between these groups (0.5% vs. 0.7%; P = .22). Persistent AF patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (9.9% vs. 7.2%; P < .01) and non-home discharge (4.8% vs. 3.1%; P < .01). The 30-day readmission rates were comparable in both groups (10.0% vs. 9.5%; P = .34), with recurrent AF and heart failure being two of the most common causes of cardiac-related readmissions. Catheter ablation among hospitalized patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF resulted in no significant difference in procedural complications, early mortality, or 30-day readmission. This suggests that catheter ablation of AF can be performed with a relatively similar safety profile for both paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Adverse Events in Total Artificial Heart for End-Stage Heart Failure: Insight From the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE).

Background and Objectives: Real-world clinical data, outside of clinical trials and expert centers, on adverse events related to the use of SyncCardia total artificial heart (TAH) remain limited. We aim to analyze adverse events related to the use of SynCardia TAH reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods: We reviewed the FDA's MAUDE database for any adverse events involving the use of SynCardia TAH from 1/01/2012 to 9/30/2020. All the events were independently reviewed by three physicians. Results: A total of 1,512 adverse events were identified in 453 "injury and death" reports in the MAUDE database. The most common adverse events reported were infection (20.2%) and device malfunction (20.1%). These were followed by bleeding events (16.5%), respiratory failure (10.1%), cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/other neurological dysfunction (8.7%), renal dysfunction (7.5%), hepatic dysfunction (2.2%), thromboembolic events (1.8%), pericardial effusion (1.8%), and hemolysis (1%). Death was reported in 49.4% of all the reported cases (n=224/453). The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure (n=73, 32.6%), followed by CVA/other non-specific neurological dysfunction (n=44, 19.7%), sepsis (n=24, 10.7%), withdrawal of support (n=20, 8.9%), device malfunction (n=11, 4.9%), bleeding (n=7, 3.1%), respiratory failure (n=7, 3.1%), gastrointestinal disorder (n=6, 2.7%), and cardiomyopathy (n=3, 1.3%). Conclusions: Infection was the most common adverse event following the implantation of TAH. Most of the deaths reported were due to multiorgan failure. Early recognition and management of any possible adverse events after the TAH implantation are essential to improve the procedural outcome and patient survival.

Utility of rapid atrial pacing before and after TAVR with balloon-expandable valve in predicting permanent pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND: High-grade or complete atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Wenckebach AVB induced by rapid atrial pacing (RAP) after TAVR was previously demonstrated in an observational analysis to be an independent predictor for PPM. We sought to investigate the utility of both pre- and post-TAVR RAP in predicting PPM implantation. METHODS: In a single-center, prospective study, 421 patients underwent TAVR with balloon-expandable valves (BEV) between April 2020 and August 2021. Intraprocedural RAP was performed in patients without a pre-existing pacemaker, atrial fibrillation/flutter, or intraprocedural complete AVB to assess for RAP-induced Wenckebach AVB. The primary outcome was PPM within 30 days after TAVR. RESULTS: RAP was performed in 253 patients, of whom 91.3% underwent post-TAVR RAP and 61.2% underwent pre-TAVR RAP. The overall PPM implantation rate at 30 days was 9.9%. Although there was a numerically higher rate of PPM at 30 days in patients with RAP-induced Wenckebach AVB, it did not reach statistical significance (13.3% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.23). In a multivariable analysis, RAP-induced Wenckebach was not an independent predictor for PPM implantation at 30 days after TAVR. PPM rates at 30 days were comparable in patients with or without pre-TAVR pacing-induced Wenckebach AVB (11.8% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.51) and post-TAVR pacing-induced Wenckebach AVB (10.2% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent TAVR with BEV, there were no statistically significant differences in PPM implantation rates at 30 days regardless of the presence or absence of RAP-induced Wenckebach AVB. Due to conflicting results between the present study and the prior observational analysis, future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to determine the role of RAP during TAVR as a risk-stratification tool for significant AVB requiring PPM after TAVR.

Impact of obesity on catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: In-hospital and 30-day outcomes.

Background: Evidence on the impact of obesity on catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is scarce. Method and Results: We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database to determine the hospital outcomes and procedural complications of VT ablation among the obese and nonobese populations. Obesity was associated with a more prolonged length of stay (p < .01), higher cost of hospitalization (p < .01), and higher rates of pericardial effusion or hemopericardium (p = .05) and vascular complications (p = .05). There was no significant difference in early mortality, 30-day readmissions, and other procedural complications. Conclusion: VT ablation could be performed relatively safely among patients with obesity.

Same-Day Discharge after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Insights from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2015-2019.

Data on the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain limited. We analyzed the US Nationwide Readmission Database from quarter four of 2015 to 2019 to study the safety and feasibility of SDD after LAAC. After excluding non-elective cases and in-hospital deaths, a total of 54,880 cases of LAAC were performed during the study period. Following LAAC, 2% (n=1077) of patients underwent SDD, 88% (n=48,428) underwent next-day discharge (NDD), 5.2% (n=2881) were discharged on the second day (ScD), and 4.5% of patients (n = 2494) were discharged 3 or more days after LAAC. There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates between SDD and NDD (7.3% [n=79] vs 7.4% [n=3585], P=0.94). The hospitalization costs were significantly lower for SDD compared with NDD ($22,963 vs $27,079, P≤0.01). SDD discharge following percutaneous LAAC appears to be safe and is associated with lower hospitalization costs. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the safety and feasibility of SDD with percutaneous LAAC.

Update on cardiac sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an inflammatory myocardial disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the deposition of non-caseating granulomas that may involve any part of the heart. Cardiac sarcoidosis is often under-diagnosed or recognized partly due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation of the disease. The three most frequent clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis are atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. A definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis can be made with histology findings from an endomyocardial biopsy. However, the diagnosis in the majority of cases is based on findings from the clinical presentation and advanced imaging due to the low sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2014 expert consensus statement and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare criteria are the two most commonly used diagnostic criteria sets. This review article summarizes the available evidence on cardiac sarcoidosis, focusing on the diagnostic criteria and stepwise approach to its management.

Clopidogrel Vs Aspirin Monotherapy Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by aspirin monotherapy indefinitely. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin in the post-PCI population after completing DAPT. We systematically searched 5 electronic databases to identify studies comparing clopidogrel with aspirin following completion of DAPT after PCI. We pooled outcomes for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We included 5 studies with 13,850 patients, of whom 5601 (40.4%) received clopidogrel. Mean follow-up was 12-36 months. All patients received drug-eluting stents. Duration of DAPT before antiplatelet monotherapy was 1-18 months. Clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE (Risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.91), any stroke (RR 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.76), ischemic stroke (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.94), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.68) when compared with aspirin. Cardiac death (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.53-1.41), all-cause death (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.81-1.39), major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.43-1.29), MI (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64-1.60), repeat revascularization (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.09), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-1.13), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.35-2.59) were not significantly different among groups. Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE and stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) following DAPT completion after PCI. There were no significant differences in mortality, major bleeding, MI, and repeat revascularization between groups.

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Vasopressin During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of vasopressin versus standard of care during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have yielded conflicting results. An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted through February 2022 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the outcomes of vasopressin versus standard of care during CPR among patients with cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was the likelihood of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) return. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. The final analysis included 11 trials with 6,609 patients. The weighted mean age was 65.5 years, and 68.2% were men. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of ROSC (33.1% vs 31.9%, odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 1.55). Subgroup analyses suggested that the use of vasopressin versus control increased the likelihood of ROSC when used in combination with steroids (pinteraction = 0.01) and in cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest (pinteraction = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of favorable neurological outcome (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.71), in-hospital mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.31), or ventricular arrhythmias (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.97). In conclusion, compared with the standard of care, the use of vasopressin during CPR did not increase the likelihood of ROSC among patients with cardiac arrest. There was no difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of the favorable neurological outcome, in-hospital mortality, or ventricular arrhythmias.

Meta-analysis Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Disease.

Outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) with multivessel coronary disease (MVD) and/or unprotected left main coronary artery disease (CAD) revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is not well defined. MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE/Ovid were queried for studies that investigated PCI vs CABG in this disease subset. The primary outcome was major cardiac adverse events (MACE) at 30 days and long-term follow-up (3-5 years). The final analysis included 9 studies with a total of 9299 patients. No significant difference was observed between PCI and CABG in 30 days MACE (risk ratio [RR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-2.39, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A meta-regression analysis revealed patients with a history of PCI had higher risk of MACE with PCI as compared with CABG. At long-term follow-up, PCI compared with CABG was associated with higher risk of MACE (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.28-1.81), myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization, while no difference was observed in the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality. In patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD or unprotected left main CAD, no differences were observed in the clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG at 30 days follow-up. With long-term follow-up, PCI was associated with a higher risk of MACE.

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Versus Warfarin After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

In the pivotal WATCHMAN trials, warfarin was used for post-procedural anticoagulation in the first 45 days after left atrial appendage closure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus warfarin after WATCHMAN. We performed a literature search of 5 electronic databases to identify studies comparing DOAC with warfarin after WATCHMAN. We pooled outcomes for the efficacy (thromboembolism, device-related thrombus [DRT], peridevice leak [PDL] >5 mm) and safety endpoints (bleeding, mortality). Thromboembolism was defined as ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. We included 10 cohort studies with 2,440 patients, of whom 1,397 (57.3%) received DOAC. Concerning periprocedural outcomes (within 7 days following implantation), DOAC was associated with a reduction in major bleeding (Risk ratio [RR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.92) compared with warfarin, without significant differences in all bleeding (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.15-1.42) and thromboembolism (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.21-4.16). On first follow-up transesophageal echocardiography, DRT (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.39-1.60) and PDL>5 mm (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.16-1.20) were comparable among groups. With a mean follow-up of 1.5-12 months, DOAC was associated with reductions in major bleeding (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.89) and all bleeding (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.25-0.58) compared with warfarin. The outcomes of thromboembolism (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.36-1.73) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.19-1.28) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Following WATCHMAN implantation, DOAC was associated with reductions in major bleeding and all bleeding compared with warfarin at mid-term follow-up. The outcomes of thromboembolism, all-cause mortality, DRT, and PDL >5 mm were comparable among groups.

Digital health intervention in patients with recent hospitalization for acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

AIM: To examine the efficacy of digital health interventions (DHI) versus standard of care among patients with prior heart failure (HF) hospitalization. METHODS: An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, OVID, CINHAL and ERIC, databases was performed through August 2021 for randomized clinical trials that evaluated the outcomes with DHI among patients with HF. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 10 randomized trials were included in our analysis, with a total of 7204 patients and a weighted follow up duration of 15.6 months. Compared with the reference group, patients in the DHI group had lower all-cause mortality (8.5% vs. 10.2%, risk ratio-RR 0.80; 95% confidence interval-CI 0.66 to 0.96; P = 0.02), as well as lower cardiovascular mortality (7.3% vs. 9.6%, RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.94; P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in HF-related hospitalizations (23.4% vs. 26.2%, RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02; P = 0.07) and all-cause hospitalizations (48.3% vs. 49.9%, RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; P = 0.11) in the DHI versus reference groups. Patients in the DHI group had fewer days lost due to HF-related hospitalizations (mean difference-MD: -1.77; 95% CI -3.06,-0.48, p = 0.01; I2 = 51), but similar days lost to all-cause hospitalizations (MD: -0.76; 95% CI -3.07,-1.55, p = 0.52; I2 = 69) compared with patients in the reference group. CONCLUSION: Compared with usual care, DHI among patients with HF provided significant reduction of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and had fewer total days lost to HF hospitalizations. There were no differences in all-cause hospitalizations, and HF hospitalizations.

Constrictive Pericarditis: An Unusual Presentation of Rheumatoid Vasculitis.

We describe a case of rheumatoid vasculitis with an atypical presentation of constrictive pericarditis. A 51-year-old man who was previously admitted for diffuse lymphadenopathy, presented with chest pain and a lower extremity rash. Extensive workup including multimodality imaging, serology tests, and biopsy, resulted in the diagnosis of rheumatoid vasculitis.

Sex-related differences in the trends and outcomes of trans-septal transcatheter mitral valve replacement: Insights from the National Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the sex-related differences in the trends and outcomes of trans-septal transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TS-TMVR). METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2015-2018) was queried for admissions for TS-TMVR. Propensity matched analysis was conducted to compare outcomes with hospitalizations for TS-TMVR among women versus men. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 2063 hospitalizations for TS-TMVR; of whom, 58.1% were women. The proportion of women among those undergoing TS-TMVR increased from 50% in 2015 to 60.2% in 2018 (Ptrend = 0.04). Compared with men, women undergoing TS-TMVR were slightly younger, and had a distinct profile of comorbidities. After matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality among women versus men undergoing TS-TMVR (7.8% vs. 6.1%, OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.79-2.13). Subgroup analyzes showed an interaction toward higher mortality with women versus men among patients with CKD (Pinteraction = 0.07). There were no significant differences between women and men in in-hospital complications or length of stay after TS-TMVR. Compared with men, women undergoing TS-TMVR were more likely to be discharged to a nursing facility (17.7% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.01) and had higher rates of 30-day readmissions (22.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis showed an increase in the proportion of women among patients undergoing TS-TMVR during the study years. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, or length of stay between both sexes following TS-TMVR. Women were more likely to be discharged to nursing facilities and had higher rates of readmission at 30 days even after propensity matching.

Same-day discharge after transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip in a tertiary community hospital: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Due to the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a realization for innovation in procedures and protocols to minimize hospital stay and at the same time ensure continued evidence-based treatment delivered to the patients. We present a same-day discharge protocol for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using MitraClip under general anaesthesia in a six-patient case series. This protocol aims to reduce the length of hospital stay, thereby minimizing potential for nosocomial COVID-19 infections and to promote safe discharge with cautious follow-up. CASE SUMMARY: Six patients with severe symptomatic mitral valve (MV) regurgitation underwent successful transfemoral MV repair using standard procedures. Following repair, patients were monitored on telemetry in the recovery area for 3 h, ambulated to assess vascular access stability and underwent post-procedural transthoracic echocardiogram to assess for any pericardial effusion or post-procedural prosthetic mitral stenosis. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after TMVR is possible when done cautiously with close follow-up, can minimize hospital stay, improve resource utilization, and reduce risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Type 2 myocardial infarction (Type 2 MI) is a common problem and carries a high diagnostic uncertainty. Large studies exploring outcomes in type 2 MI are lacking. Nationwide Readmission Database (2017) was queried using the International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-10-CM) to identify type 2 MI patients. Characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, 30-day readmissions, and predictors of in-hospital mortality as well as 30-day readmissions were explored. We identified 21,738 patients with a diagnosis of type 2 MI. Most common primary diagnosis at presentation included infection/sepsis (27.5%), hypertensive heart disease (15.3%) and pulmonary diseases (8.5%). Overall, in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission for patients with type 2 MI were 9.0% and 19.1% respectively. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of increased in-hospital mortality included male gender, coexisting atrial fibrillation/flutter, peripheral vascular disease, coagulopathy, malignancy, and fluid/electrolyte abnormalities. Significant predictors of 30-day readmission were coexisting diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation/ flutter, carotid artery stenosis, anemia, COPD, CKD and prior history of myocardial infarction, A primary diagnosis of sepsis, pulmonary issues including respiratory failure, neurological conditions including stroke carried highest risk of mortality however readmission risk was not influenced by primary diagnosis at presentation. In conclusion, approximately 1 in 10 patients admitted for type 2 MI died during admission, and nearly 1 in 5 patients were readmitted at 30 days after discharge. In-hospital mortality varied based on associated primary diagnosis at presentation. Proposed predictive model for mortality and 30-day readmission in our study can help to target high risk patients for post-Type 2 MI care.

Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the WATCHMAN Device.

BACKGROUND: As the use of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) becomes more widespread, improvements in resource utilization and cost-effectiveness are necessary. Currently, there are limited data on same-day discharge (SDD) after LAAC. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SDD versus non-SDD in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 211 patients who underwent the WATCHMAN procedure in a tertiary hospital (June 2016 to June 2019). The primary safety outcome was the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding requiring transfusion, vascular complications requiring endovascular intervention, or death through 7 days (periprocedural) and 45 days post-procedure. The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause readmission. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who had SDD and non-SDD post-procedure. RESULTS: Patients with procedure-related complications on the day of LAAC and patients who were admitted for acute clinical events before LAAC were excluded. One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis. Seventy-two of 190 (38%) patients had SDD, and 118 of 190 (62%) had non-SDD. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary safety outcome through 7 days (1.4% versus 5.9%; P=0.26) and 45 days post-procedure (2.8% versus 9.3%; P=0.14) between the two groups. The secondary outcomes were similar in both groups. No patients had device-related thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography at 45 days. Only 1 patient from the non-SDD group had clinically significant peri-device flow (>5 mm) at 45 days. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected cohort of patients who underwent successful elective LAAC with WATCHMAN without same-day procedure-related complications, the primary safety outcome and secondary outcomes through 7 and 45 days post-procedure were similar in the SDD and non-SDD groups. Our findings are hypothesis generating and warrant further investigation in prospective trials.

Transcatheter cerebral embolic protection during WATCHMAN procedure in two patients with persistent left atrial appendage thrombus: Case report with review of the literature.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been increasingly used in patients with atrial fibrillation who are poor candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation. The presence of a left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is a contraindication for percutaneous LAAC. Despite oral anticoagulation, persistent thrombus is not uncommon. We describe the use of transcatheter cerebral embolic protection with the Sentinel cerebral protection system during LAAC using WATCHMAN in two atrial fibrillation patients who had persistent LAA thrombus despite oral anticoagulation.

The WATCHMAN device and post-implantation anticoagulation management. A review of key studies and the risk of device-related thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (Afib). Anticoagulation is the gold standard to prevent stroke and systemic embolization. However, many patients have a contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device, which closes the left atrial appendage, is non-inferior to warfarin to prevent embolic events in clinical trials. Post-procedural anticoagulation is needed to avoid device-related thrombosis. The use of anticoagulants after WATCHMAN implantation in patients with high bleeding risks has been a source of debate. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the current evidence on anticoagulation following the implantation of the WATCHMAN device, focusing on patients who have an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. OBSERVATION: The WATCHMAN device is efficacious and safe in preventing stroke and systemic embolization. Warfarin and aspirin are given for 45 days after implantation. If TEE at 45 days shows minimal residual peri-device flow (≤ 5mm) and no device-related thrombus, warfarin is stopped. This is followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for six months, then aspirin indefinitely. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for six months followed by daily aspirin indefinitely may be feasible for patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC. DOACs are more convenient to use than warfarin, and limited evidence suggests that they are not inferior following implantation of the device. CONCLUSION: Following the WATCHMAN implantation, the most often utilized regimen is warfarin followed by antiplatelet treatment. In cases where there is a high risk of bleeding, antiplatelets alone may be sufficient. More research is needed to tailor the existing antithrombotic regimen to the needs of patients.