Collaborative model of care between orthopaedics and allied healthcare professionals (CONNACT) in knee osteoarthritis: Effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomized controlled trial of a community-based, multidisciplinary, stratified intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the Collaborative Model of Care between Orthopaedics and Allied Healthcare Professionals (CONNACT), a community-based, stratified, multidisciplinary intervention consisting of exercise, education, psychological and nutrition delivered through a chronic care model to usual hospital care in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Pragmatic, parallel-arm, single-blinded superiority RCT trial. Community-dwelling, ambulant adults with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade > 1; Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS4) ≤75) were enrolled. Primary outcome was KOOS4 at 12-months; secondary outcomes included: quality of life, physical performance measures, symptom satisfaction, psychological outcomes, dietary habits, and global perceived effect. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalized linear model (GLM) and regression modeling were conducted. Economic evaluation through a societal approach was embedded. RESULTS: 110 participants (55 control, 55 intervention) were randomized. No between-group difference found for the primary outcome (MD [95%CI]: -1.86 [-9.11. 5.38]), although both groups demonstrated within-group improvement over 12-months. Among the secondary outcomes, the CONNACT group demonstrated superior dietary change (12 months) and physical performance measures (3 months), and global perceived effect (6 months). While there was no between-group difference in total cost, significant productivity gains (reduced indirect cost) were seen in the CONNACT group. CONCLUSION: CONNACT was not superior to usual care at 1 year. Further efforts are needed to understand the underlying contextual and implementation factors in order to further improve and refine such community-based, stratified care models moving forward. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03809975. Registered January 18, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03809975.

Bundled Payments for Hip Fracture Surgery Are Associated With Improved Access, Quality, and Health Care Utilization, but Higher Costs for Complex Cases: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of bundled payments for surgically managed hip fractures on care access, care quality, health care resource utilization, clinical impact, and acute care cost. DESIGN: An observational retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental design comparing prebundled and postbundled payments through an interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: A public acute care general hospital. PATIENTS: Patients 60 years and older, with surgery for an isolated, unilateral, nonpathological hip fracture during 2014-first quarter of 2019 [diagnosis-related group codes: I03A, I03B, I08A, and I08B] and transferred to specific rehabilitation institutions were studied. INTERVENTION: Bundled payments for funder-to-provider reimbursement. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS: Care access, care quality, health care resource utilization, clinical impact, and cost. RESULTS: Of 1477 patients, 811 were assigned to prebundled and 666 to postbundled payments. Although there was an improving trend of ward admission waiting times during postbundled payments [odds ratio (OR) = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.28], ward admission waiting times were longer when compared with prebundled payments (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23-0.85). Rates of 30-day all-cause readmissions were lower (OR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.67), and trends of reducing inpatient rehabilitation and overall episode length of stay (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.16-1.37 and OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.07-1.28, respectively) were demonstrated during postbundled payments. Acute care cost for complex cases were higher (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.92) during bundled payments, compared with prebundled payments. CONCLUSIONS: Bundled payments for surgically managed hip fractures were associated with benefits for several outcomes pertinent to clinical improvement initiatives. More work, especially concerning cost-effective surgical implants and better care cost computations, are critically needed to contain the growth of acute medical care cost for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures? An economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The ideal implant for stable, noncomminuted olecranon fractures is controversial. Tension band wiring (TBW) is associated with lower cost but higher implant removal rates.On the other hand, plate fixation (PF) is purported to be biomechanically superior, with lower failure and implant removal rates, although associated with higher cost. The primary aim of this study is to look at the clinical outcomes for all Mayo 2A olecranon between PF and TBW. The secondary aim is to perform an economic evaluation of PF vs. TBW. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all surgically treated Mayo 2A olecranon fractures in a tertiary hospital from 2005-2016. Demographic data, medical history, range of motion, and complications were collected. All inpatient and outpatient costs in a 1-year period postsurgery including the index surgical procedure were collected via the hospital administrative cost database (normalized to 2014). RESULTS: A total of 147 cases were identified (94 TBW, 53 PF). PF was associated with higher mean age (P < .01), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < .01), and higher proportion of hypertensives (P = .04). There was no difference in the range of motion achieved at 1 year for both groups. In terms of complications, TBW was associated with more symptomatic hardware (21.6% vs. 13.7%, P = .24) and implant failures (16.5% vs. none, P < .01), whereas the plate group had a higher wound complication (5.9% vs. none, P = .02) and infection rate (9.8% vs. 3.1%, P = .09). TBW had a higher implant removal rate of 30.9% compared with 22.7% for PF (P = .36). PF had a higher cost at all time points, from the index surgery ($10,313.64 vs. $5896.36, P < .01), 1-year cost excluding index surgery ($5069.61 vs. $3850.46, P = .46), and outpatient cost ($1667.80 vs. $1613.49, P = .27). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on our study results, we have demonstrated that TBW is the ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures from both a clinical and economic standpoint, with comparable clinical results, potentially similar implant removal rates as PF's, and a lower cost over a 1-year period. In choosing the ideal implant, the surgeon must take into account, first, the local TBW and PF removal rate, which can vary significantly because of the patient's profile and beliefs, and second, the PF implant cost.

SLAP Lesion with Supraglenoid Labral Cyst causing Suprascapular Nerve Compression: A case report.

ABSTRACT: We present a case of left suprascapular nerve palsy in a 39- year-old female secondary to compression from a large ganglion cyst. She presented with a two month history of left posterior shoulder pain which affected her work and disturbed her sleep. Clinical examination revealed a positive O'Brien's test. Supraspinatus and infraspinatus strength was mildly weakened. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the left shoulder revealed a superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesion with a large supraglenoid labral cyst extending posteriorly to the spinoglenoid notch, resulting in compression of the suprascapular nerve. Arthroscopy revealed the SLAP lesion with a haemorrhagic labral cyst at the posterosuperior aspect. Arthroscopic decompression of the cyst and SLAP repair with two suture anchors was performed. At 22 months postoperative follow-up, the patient's left shoulder remained asymptomatic with full range of motion and full strength. KEY WORDS: SLAP lesion; Supraglenoid Labral Cyst; Suprascapular Nerve Compression.