Anatomical tilt lateral wrist X-ray - Not always 22°.

INTRODUCTION: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates are commonly used to manage distal radial fractures. The anatomical tilt lateral (ATL) wrist X-ray is often required for evaluation of intra-articular screw penetration due to the screw position. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between the tube angulation given by performing radiographers for the ATL projection and the post-examination measurement of radial inclination (RI) on the Posterior Anterior (PA) wrist image. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for 36 patients. A standardised method developed by Kreder et al. (1996) was used to measure the RI on the PA wrist image. All ATL images sent into Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) have the tube angulation applied annotated on the image. Pearson's correlation was used to analyse the co-relationship between the RI and the tube angle applied for ATL projection. RESULTS: The average angle of RI measured by the four observers was 19. Normality of 0.385 was established. A positive correlation (p = 0.792) between the RI and the tube angle applied for ATL was found. CONCLUSION: Our study found a strong positive correlation between the tube angulation applied by performing radiographers for the ATL projection and the post-examination RI measured on the PA wrist image by the independent reviewers. This suggests that radiographers can use the measured RI to apply the tube angulation when performing the ATL wrist X-ray, instead of estimating the tube angulation to be applied. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Using the measured RI to apply the tube angulation when performing the ATL wrist X-ray will ensure a more reliable and reproducible way that could reduce the number of repeated images and, thus, unnecessary radiation dose to patients.

Accuracy of radiographer comment following a two-month experiential and blended learning in appendicular skeleton X-ray interpretation: The Singapore experience.

INTRODUCTION: The value of combined blended and experiential learning on radiographer diagnostic comment has not been explored. This study aims to examine the accuracy of image interpretation comment of radiographers who received a period of blended and experiential learning in Radiographer Abnormality Detection Systems (RADS). METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic opinions of 13 radiographers who received a blended training and experiential learning (a process of self-learning and reflection) in RADS. Radiographers' opinions on 16,483 images were examined using the final radiologists' report as a reference standard. For each radiographer, we recorded the number of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative opinions and MedCal® was used to calculate diagnostic performance and error rates. A t-test was used to assess whether the number of images read was associated with performance and whether the radiographers retained performance over time. RESULTS: Sensitivity ranged from 87.4 (84.0-90.2) to 98.9 (97.5-99.7) with a mean of 94.3 (93.6-94.8). Specificity varied from 96.4 (94.8-97.5) to 99.9 (99.41-100.0) with a mean of 98.2 (97.9-98.4). Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 93.1 (91.5-94.4) to 99.5 (98.9-99.8) with a mean of 96.9 (96.6-97.1). The mean false positive rate was 0.018 (range: 0.010-0.031) with a false negative rate of 0.057 (range: 0.026-0.11). There were no differences in performance between the first and latter nine months of providing opinions and the number of images reviewed was not associated with performance. CONCLUSION: Radiographers who received blended and experiential learning in RADS provide accurate diagnostic comments on plain emergency appendicular skeleton radiographs. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: A combined blended and experiential learning can equip radiographers to provide diagnostic opinion on plain appendicular skeleton radiographs.