Therapeutic applications of germline testing for cancer predisposition genes in Asia in the real world.

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing is traditionally carried out in patients suspected with hereditary cancer syndrome for enhanced cancer surveillance and/or preventive strategies, but is increasingly carried out for therapeutic indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent germline genetic testing at our centre to determine the prevalence of actionable pathogenic germline variants (PGV) and their clinical utility. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2022, 1154 cancer patients underwent germline testing, with the majority (945/1154) tested with multi-gene panels. Four hundred and eleven (35.6%) patients harboured a PGV and 334 (81%) were clinically actionable. BRCA1/2 accounted for 62.3% of actionable mutations, followed by mismatch repair (18%), and other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes (19.7%). One hundred and fifty-two germline-positive patients have advanced cancers, and 79 received germline-directed therapies (poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors = 75; immunotherapy = 4). Median duration of immunotherapy and poly ADP ribose polymerase were 20.5 months (range 5-40 months) and 8 months (range 1-76 months), respectively. Among BRCA/HRR mutation carriers who received platinum-based chemotherapy, pathological complete response rate in the neoadjuvant setting was 53% (n = 17 breast cancers) and objective response rate was >80% in the advanced setting (n = 71). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of cancer patients tested carried a PGV and ∼80% were clinically actionable. Three-quarters of germline-positive advanced cancer patients received germline-directed therapies in the real world, underscoring the practical utility of germline testing to guide cancer therapeutics.

ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with metastatic cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: a report from the APODDC working group.

INTRODUCTION: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) diagnostics have shown clinical utility in predicting survival benefits in patients with certain cancer types who are undergoing targeted drug therapies. Currently, there are no guidelines or recommendations for the use of NGS in patients with metastatic cancer from an Asian perspective. In this article, we present the Asia-Pacific Oncology Drug Development Consortium (APODDC) recommendations for the clinical use of NGS in metastatic cancers. METHODS: The APODDC set up a group of experts in the field of clinical cancer genomics to (i) understand the current NGS landscape for metastatic cancers in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region; (ii) discuss key challenges in the adoption of NGS testing in clinical practice; and (iii) adapt/modify the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines for local use. Nine cancer types [breast cancer (BC), gastric cancer (GC), nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), ovarian cancer (OC), prostate cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] were identified, and the applicability of NGS was evaluated in daily practice and/or clinical research. Asian ethnicity, accessibility of NGS testing, reimbursement, and socioeconomic and local practice characteristics were taken into consideration. RESULTS: The APODDC recommends NGS testing in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Routine NGS testing is not recommended in metastatic BC, GC, and NPC as well as cholangiocarcinoma and HCC. The group suggested that patients with epithelial OC may be offered germline and/or somatic genetic testing for BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1), BRCA2, and other OC susceptibility genes. Access to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors is required for NGS to be of clinical utility in prostate cancer. Allele-specific PCR or a small-panel multiplex-gene NGS was suggested to identify key alterations in CRC. CONCLUSION: This document offers practical guidance on the clinical utility of NGS in specific cancer indications from an Asian perspective.

The role of homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer and its clinical implications: do we need it?

The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as a frequent feature of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) has transformed treatment paradigms. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), developed based on the rationale of synthetic lethality that predicates antitumor efficacy in tumors harboring underlying HRD, now represents an important class of therapy for HGSOC. Recent data have drawn attention to the assessment of homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in HGSOC, leading to increasing debate on the optimal means of defining and evaluating HRD, both genotypically and phenotypically. At present, clinical-grade assays such as myChoice CDx and FoundationOne CDx are approved companion diagnostics which can identify patients with HRD-positive HGSOC by diagnosing a 'genomic scar' reflecting underlying genomic instability. Yet despite the rapid maturation of this field, tumoral HRD status has been recognized to be dynamic over time and with treatment pressure. In practice, this means that restoration of HRR through mechanisms of platinum and PARPi resistance are not adequately represented by genomic scar assays, and contribute toward discordance with clinical PARPi response, or lack-thereof. It is thus critical that HRD testing is optimized to address the controversies of diverse HRD testing methodology, appropriate thresholds for HRD identification, and relevant timepoints for HRD testing, in order to realize the potential for PARPis to maximally benefit patients with HGSOC. Here, we discuss the premise of HRD testing in HGSOC, current methodologies for HRD identification and their performance in the clinic, highlight upcoming strategies, and discuss the challenges faced in moving this field forward.

The systemic treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer revisited.

Treatment approaches for relapsed ovarian cancer have evolved over the past decade from a calendar-based decision tree to a patient-oriented biologically driven algorithm. Nowadays, platinum-based chemotherapy should be offered to all patients with a reasonable chance of responding to this therapy. The treatment-free interval for platinum is only one of many factors affecting patients' eligibility for platinum re-treatment. Bevacizumab increases the response to chemotherapy irrespective of the cytotoxic regimen and can be valuable in patients with an urgent need for symptom relief (e.g. pleural effusion, ascites). For patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer, which responds to platinum-based treatment, maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor can be offered, regardless of the BRCA mutation status. Here we review contemporary decision-making processes in the systemic treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer.

Tumor molecular profiling of responders and non-responders following pembrolizumab monotherapy in chemotherapy resistant advanced cervical cancer.

Optimal treatment for advanced cervical cancer after first line chemotherapy remains undefined. Immune checkpoint inhibition with pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) inhibitor, is under investigation. We analyzed the micro-environmental and molecular genetic profile of tumors from 4 patients with metastatic cervical cancer treated with off-label second-line pembrolizumab in an effort to identify predictive biomarkers. All patients received 2 mg/kg of pembrolizumab, 3-weekly until disease progression. Immunohistochemistry(IHC) for PD-1, PD-L1, CD3 and CD8, as well as next generation sequencing (NGS) for 50 cancer-related genes were performed on tumor samples. All patients tolerated treatment well with no discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. One patient experienced dramatic and prolonged partial response, and remains stable on pembrolizumab with a progression free survival (PFS) of 21 months at the time of reporting of this series. Three patients experienced disease progression as best response. In the exceptional responder, there was no tumoral expression of PD-L1, however, combined positive score (CPS) for PD-L1 was 1 and we identified somatic mutations in ERBB4(R612W), PIK3CA(E542K) and RB1(E365K). In 2 patients, despite progressive disease defined by RECIST v1.1, symptom stabilization on pembrolizumab was observed. The tumors of both patients had PD-1 expression in ≥1% of stromal lymphocytes. All patients with response or clinical benefit had CPS for PD-L1 ≥ 1. NGS revealed PIK3CA mutations in 3 tumors. Pembrolizumab is a promising therapeutic option in advanced cervical cancer. Further evaluation of biomarkers may guide optimal patient selection.

New perspectives on molecular targeted therapy in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Ovarian clear cell carcinomas (OCCCs) account for about 5-13% of all epithelial ovarian carcinomas in Western populations. It is characterised by resistance to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy, and new therapeutic strategies are urgently required. This article will focus on how recent discoveries have enhanced our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of OCCCs, leading to new therapeutic opportunities. These include mutations in ARID1A, which provides a link to endometriosis, upregulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway, particularly through mutations of PIK3CA and inactivation of PTEN, and increased activity of pathways involved in angiogenesis. Targeting HER2, apoptotic escape mechanisms and mismatch repair defects offer additional opportunities for treating this enigmatic tumour subtype.

Genomic profile of a secretory breast cancer with an ETV6-NTRK3 duplication.

BACKGROUND: Secretory breast cancer (SBC) is a rare entity characterised by indolent clinical behaviour, distinctive histological features and the presence of a recurrent chromosomal translocation t(12;15)(p13;q25), leading to the formation of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. AIM: To describe the molecular genetic features of a case of SBC which harbours a duplication of the t(12;15) translocation. METHODS: Tiling path array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using in-house-generated probes for ETV6, NTRK3 and the fusion genes, centromeric probes for chromosomes 12 and 15, and a commercially available split-apart ETV6/NTRK3 probe. RESULTS: FISH revealed the presence of a duplication of the translocation t(12;15), which resulted from the gain of one copy of the derivative chromosome der(15)t(12;15), retention of one normal copy of both ETV6 and NTRK3 genes and deletion of the derivative chromosome der(12)t(12;15). Consistent with FISH findings, aCGH revealed copy number gains of ETV6 and NTRK3 and deletions encompassing the regions centromeric to ETV6 and telomeric to NTRK3. Additional regions of copy number changes included gains of 10q21, 10q26.3, 12p13.3-p13.31 15q11-q25.3 and 16pq and losses of 6q24.1-q27, 12p13.2-q12 and 15q25.3-q26.3. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a carcinoma has been shown to harbour a duplication of the ETV6-NTRK3 translocation. The presence of an additional copy of the derivative chromosome der(15)t(12;15) coupled with deletion of the other derivative der(12)t(12;15) in the modal population of cancer cells suggests that this was either an early phenomenon or conferred additional growth advantage on neoplastic cells.

The genomic profile of HER2-amplified breast cancers: the influence of ER status.

Expression profiling studies have suggested that HER2-amplified breast cancers constitute a heterogeneous group that may be subdivided according to their ER status: HER2-amplified ER-positive breast carcinomas that fall into the luminal B cluster; and HER2-amplified ER-negative cancers which form a distinct molecular subgroup, known as the erbB2 or HER2 subgroup. ER-negative breast cancer differs significantly from ER-positive disease in the pattern, type, and complexity of genetic aberrations. Here we have compared the genomic profiles of ER-positive and ER-negative HER2-amplified cancers using tiling path microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Validation of the differentially amplified regions was performed in an independent series of 70 HER2-amplified breast cancers. Although HER2-amplified cancers had remarkably complex patterns of molecular genetic aberrations, ER-positive and ER-negative HER2-amplified breast carcinomas shared most molecular genetic features as defined by aCGH. Genome-wide Fisher's exact test analysis revealed that less than 1.5% of the genome was significantly differentially gained or lost in ER-positive versus ER-negative HER2-amplified cancers. However, two regions of amplification were significantly associated with ER-positive carcinomas, one of which mapped to 17q21.2 and encompassed GJC1, IGFBP4, TNS4, and TOP2A. Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of an independent validation series confirmed the association between ER status and TOP2A amplification. In conclusion, although hormone receptor status does not determine the overall genetic profile of HER2-amplified breast cancers, specific genetic aberrations may be characteristic of subgroups of HER2 breast cancers.

ESR1 amplification in endometrial carcinomas: hope or hyperbole?

The ESR1 gene maps 6q25 and encodes for oestrogen receptor alpha, which has been shown to play a pivotal role in the development of breast and endometrial cancer. It has recently been reported that oestrogen receptor alpha expression may be driven in some cases by ESR1 gene amplification and that this phenomenon may be an early event in breast and endometrial carcinogenesis. Although copy number gains of 6q have been reported by several groups, their prevalence, association with oestrogen receptor alpha expression, and clinical implications have been a matter of controversy. Here we discuss the key issues regarding the methods employed in the identification of ESR1 amplification, and briefly review the current literature and recent controversies on the subject of ESR1 amplification in endometrial and breast cancers.

Hereditary breast cancer: from molecular pathology to tailored therapies.

Hereditary breast cancer accounts for up to 5-10% of all breast carcinomas. Recent studies have demonstrated that mutations in two high-penetrance genes, namely BRCA1 and BRCA2, are responsible for about 16% of the familial risk of breast cancer. Even though subsequent studies have failed to find another high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene, several genes that confer a moderate to low risk of breast cancer development have been identified; moreover, hereditary breast cancer can be part of multiple cancer syndromes. In this review we will focus on the hereditary breast carcinomas caused by mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, Fanconi anaemia (FANC) genes, CHK2 and ATM tumour suppressor genes. We describe the hallmark histological features of these carcinomas compared with non-hereditary breast cancers and show how an accurate histopathological diagnosis may help improve the identification of patients to be screened for mutations. Finally, novel therapeutic approaches to treat patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations, including cross-linking agents and PARP inhibitors, are discussed.