Outcomes of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with parotid metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cHNSCC) metastatic to the parotid has a moderate risk of recurrence despite multimodality treatment. Immunosuppression is associated with lower rates of long-term cure. Our aim was to review outcomes of current management in a tertiary centre with a view to targeting future strategies. METHODS: A retrospective review of clinico-pathological data and outcomes for patients with metastatic cHNSCC involving the parotid gland, undergoing radical surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy during 2000-2014 was conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 5.0 years. Five-year overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 44% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 34-53%), 64% (95% CI 52-74%) and 37% (95% CI 28-47%) respectively. Locoregional control (LRC) was 68% (95% CI 55-77%) at 5 years. Immunosuppressed patients fared worse (compared with immune-competent) with five-year OS, CSS, and PFS of 14% versus 53% (HR = 3.19; 95% CI 1.91-5.34), 40% versus 71% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.92; 95% CI 1.38-6.19) and 10% versus 46% (HR = 2.51; 95% CI 1.52-4.14) respectively. On multivariate analysis, immune status strongly predicted OS (P < 0.001), CSS (P = 0.003), DMFS (P < 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001), but not LRC. Largest lymph node size was the only significant factor predictive for LRC on multivariate analysis (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite multimodality treatment metastatic cHNSCC involving the parotid shows moderate rates of recurrence. Immunosuppressed patients with this disease have a particularly poor prognosis, demonstrating lower rates of CSS with similar rates of LRC compared to their immunocompetent counterparts.

p16-positive lymph node metastases from cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: No association with high-risk human papillomavirus or prognosis and implications for the workup of the unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of p16 overexpression and the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC) are unclear. METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients with cHNSCC lymph node metastases involving the parotid gland were evaluated for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. The detection of 18 high-risk HPV subtypes was performed with HPV RNA in situ hybridization for a subset of 59 patients. The results were correlated with clinicopathological features and outcomes. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 5.3 years. No differences were observed in clinicopathological factors with respect to the p16 status. p16 was positive, weak, and negative in 45 (31%), 21 (15%), and 77 cases (54%), respectively. No high-risk HPV subtypes were identified, regardless of the p16 status. The p16 status was not prognostic for overall (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.36; P = .528), cancer-specific (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.64; P = .542), or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.29; P = .783). Distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from locoregional failure, and freedom from local failure were also not significantly associated with the p16 status. CONCLUSIONS: p16 positivity is common but not prognostic in cHNSCC lymph node metastases. High-risk HPV subtypes are not associated with p16 positivity and do not appear to play a role in this disease. HPV testing, in addition to the p16 status in the unknown primary setting, may provide additional information for determining a putative primary site.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer allows overall treatment times to be reduced to as little as 1 week while maintaining a non-invasive approach. This study provides a comprehensive summary of the literature relating to SBRT in prostate cancer. A systematic review of the relevant literature was performed using structured search terms. Fourteen phase I-II trials and retrospective studies using SBRT for the treatment of prostate cancer were used. Three studies were identified which addressed cost. Dose fractionation, radiotherapy procedures, biochemical progression-free survival, toxicity, cost and quality of life were critically appraised. A total of 1472 patients were examined across studies. Median follow-up ranged from 11 to 60 months. The most common dose fractionation was 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions, used in nine out of 14 studies. Ten of 14 studies used CyberKnife. The overall biochemical progression-free survival ranged 81-100%. Acute grade 2 urinary and rectal toxicities were reported in 5-42% and 0-27% of patients, respectively. Acute grade 3 or more urinary and rectal toxicity were 0.5% and 0%, respectively. Late grade 2 urinary toxicity was reported in 0-29% of patients, while 1.3% had a late grade 3 urinary toxicity. There were no late grade 4 urinary toxicities seen. Late grade 2 rectal toxicity was reported in 0-11%, while 0.5% had a late grade 3 rectal toxicity. Late grade 4 rectal toxicity was reported in 0.2% of patients.