Nontuberculous mycobacteria infections of peritoneal dialysis patients: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections pose a diagnostic challenge in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. In this study, we sought to identify findings that are suggestive of NTM infection in PD adult patients. METHODS: All patients with NTM exit-site infection (ESI) with/without tunnel infection and peritonitis identified during the last decade in eight medical centers in Israel were included. Clinical, microbiological, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified; 16 had ESI (53%) and 14 had peritonitis (47%). Median age was 65 years (interquartile range 52-76). Abdominal pain and cloudy PD fluid were reported in all patients with peritonitis, whereas exit-site discharge and granulation tissue were common in patients with ESI. Fourteen patients (47%) had negative cultures prior NTM diagnosis, and isolation of diphtheroids or Corynebacterium spp. was reported in 9 of 30 patients (30%). Antimicrobial treatment prior to diagnosis was documented in 13 of 30 patients (43%). Delayed diagnosis was frequent. Treatment regimens and duration of therapy varied widely. In 26 of 30 (87%) patients, catheter was removed and 19 of 30 patients (63%) required permanent transition to hemodialysis. Two patients with peritonitis (2 of 14, 14%) and seven with ESI (7 of 16, 44%) were eligible for continuation of PD. CONCLUSIONS: Culture negative peritonitis, isolation of diphtheroids or Corynebacterium spp., previous exposure to antibiotics, and/or a refractory infection should all prompt consideration of PD-related NTM infection and timely workup. Catheter removal is recommended aside prolonged antimicrobial therapy. In select patients with ESI, continuation of PD may be feasible.

The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal catheter dysfunction is a frequent complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Traditionally, dysfunction has been attributed to catheter malposition, but whether the location of the catheter tip in the small pelvis really determines proper function is unclear. METHODS: We reviewed 900 abdominal X-ray images of PD patients from a 7-year period in two PD units that use different catheter types (straight and Swan Neck Curled). RESULTS: In 52% of the images, the dialysis catheter tip was located in the ideal position in the small pelvis and in 48% in other sites. Peritoneal catheter function was normal at the time of imaging in 87% of those with ideal catheter tip position, and in 74% of those with other than ideal position. The tip was located in small pelvis in 35% of images performed during catheter dysfunction and in 56% of those performed during normal catheter function. There were no differences between two catheter types. The positive predictive value of abdominal X-ray images to predict catheter function was 26%, and the negative predictive value 87%. We also found a significant positive correlation between polycystic kidney disease and normal catheter function. In contrast, obese patients were more likely to have catheter malfunction. Previous abdominal surgery was not associated with catheter dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our data showed a higher probability of normal function of peritoneal catheters whose tips were located in the small pelvis. However, also malpositioned catheters generally functioned well, and malpositioning of the PD catheter did not in itself explain its malfunction.