Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(Supplement): S165-S169, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36510959

RESUMO

Objectives: To cross-culturally adapt and determine reliability and validity of the Hindi version of the Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI-H). Background: Xerostomia is common among older individuals and patients with head and neck radiation or autoimmune diseases, and it can affect their oral as well as systemic quality of life. To assess the perception of this condition, SXI-H can be used. Materials and Methods: This was a multi-centric cross-sectional observational study of volunteers suffering from hypo-salivation in three tertiary care cancer hospitals in Delhi, India. The English version of Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI-5) was translated into Hindi according to standard guidelines and field tested. The Hindi version of SXI-5 (SXI-H) was tested on 120 patients with xerostomia. All the participants signed the informed consent form before being interviewed with SXI-H. Thirty participants were interviewed again after 15 days. A global question was asked for criteria validity. Data were analyzed through IBM SPSSTM Statistics for windows version 24. Significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: Overall SXI-H score of sample was 11.48 ± 2.29. Cronbach's α value was 0.81. The correlation between the SXI-H summary score and the standard question was 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.74). It was found that the intra-class correlation coefficient value for the test-retest reliability was 0.90 and scores for individual question ranged from 0.41 to 0.76. Conclusion: The SXI-H demonstrated excellent psychometric properties and can be considered a valid tool for assessing xerostomia in a dry mouth patient.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Xerostomia , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estudos Transversais , Xerostomia/diagnóstico , Xerostomia/etiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia
2.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res ; 8(3): 169-173, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30123747

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Complete edentulism is an eventual oral health outcome and results from the combined pathology of dental caries, periodontal disease, or faulty method of rehabilitation due to reduced cost. Complete edentulism has a significant concern and leads to reduced quality of life (QoL) along with impact on general health. However, it has been observed that due to wider and better oral health services globally, edentulism rate is decreasing every decade. Edentulism is directly related to masticatory and nutritional problems, and some authors regard it as a good mortality indicator. METHODOLOGY: The sample population consisted of 100 individuals comprising 63 males and 37 females who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) was administered by a single investigator at baseline (preinsertion) and also 6 and 12 months postdenture insertion. Sociodemographic data, including age and gender, were also collected. RESULTS: It was observed that the overall oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) scores of the sample improved significantly at 6 and 12 months postinsertion (P < 0.001) when compared to baseline scores. When GOHAI scores were compared individually for males and females (pre- and post-insertion), it was observed that there was statistically significant improvement in OHRQoL (male - pre = 25.02 ± 1.34 and post-12 months = 8.84 ± 1.26, P < 0.001, female - pre = 25.19 ± 0.88 and post-12 months = 9.05 ± 1.20, P < 0.001) postinsertion of denture in both the groups. CONCLUSION: OHRQoL in patients improved after complete denture rehabilitation. There was an upward shift in score for each item in GOHAI from preinsertion to 6 and 12 months postinsertion of dentures, reflecting improvement in OHRQoL of the sample.

3.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc ; 18(3): 271-276, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30111917

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and to compare the accuracy of implant casts obtained by open tray pick-up impression technique using 2 types of custom-made trays and a specialized aluminum stock impression tray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A heat-cure acrylic resin master model was fabricated. Two implants were placed parallel to each other. Ten impressions were made from each group. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material with single step putty wash technique was used for making all the impressions. The resultant casts obtained were compared to the master models with respect to the distances measured between the reference points using a stereomicroscope. The data obtained was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc procedures, and t-test. RESULTS: Mean value obtained was 2.012967 cm (±0.007060) for corimplant stock tray, 2.012627 cm (±0.007945) for autopolymerizing acrylic resin tray, 2.010279 cm (±0.006832) for light-cure hybrid composite tray. P value was calculated to be >0.05; hence, there was nonsignificant deviation of observations from standard value in each group. CONCLUSION: Statistically insignificant difference was found between the accuracy of casts obtained by the different impression trays. However, light-cure hybrid composite trays showed best results followed by autopolymerizing acrylic resin trays and Corimplant stock tray.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...