Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci ; 4(3): 374-7, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12765296

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To directly compare the quality of harmonic imaging (HI) and fundamental imaging (FI) in fetal echocardiography and to determine any differences in image quality between the two modalities. METHODS: Fetal echocardiograms were performed with the use of FI and HI in 58 fetuses, image quality and visualization of left and right atria, left and right ventricles, mitral and tricuspid valves, aortic and pulmonary valves, left and right ventricular outflow tracts were evaluated and compared between FI and HI. RESULTS: Mean HI scores were higher than mean FI scores (2.73 +/- 0.43 vs 2.16 +/- 0.69, P < 0.001) for all the cardiovascular structures evaluated. Compared with FI, HI improved the image quality and visualization of fetal cardiac structures in subjects with both good (2.73 +/- 0.43 vs 2.88 +/- 0.32, P < 0.001) and suboptimal (1. 65 +/- 0.41 vs 2.58 +/- 0.47, P < 0.001) echocardiographic windows. The interobserver correlation coefficient for the grading scores was 0.74 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: harmonic imaging enhances and improves the image quality of fetal echocardiography; and has important potential role in cardiac imaging in the fetus.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/métodos , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Ecocardiografia Doppler/métodos , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...