Self-perceived upper extremity motor function predicts health-related quality of life in chronic stroke survivors.

PURPOSE: To examine whether the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) score independently contributes to the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) score and quantified its relative contribution to SIS scores in chronic stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study in a university-based rehabilitation centre with people with chronic stroke (N = 95) aged ≥ 50 years. The outcome measures included paretic hand grip strength, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), UEFI, and SIS. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that paretic hand grip strength, FMA-UE, UEFI, and WMFT scores exhibited a significant moderate positive correlation with SIS scores (r = 0.544-0.687, p < 0.001). The results of a regression model indicated that after adjustment for demographic factors and stroke-related impairments, the UEFI scores remained independently associated with SIS scores, accounting for 18.8% of the variance. The entire model explained 60.3% of the variance in SIS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Self-perceived UE motor function is a crucial component to be included in rehabilitation programmes aimed at enhancing quality of life and participation among chronic stroke survivors.

Observation-based outcome measures, e.g., Fugl­Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) could not predict the health-related quality of life (Stroke Impact scale (SIS)) in chronic stroke survivors in our study, which was contradictory with current studies.A self-perceived outcome measure to evaluate upper extremity function (Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI)) could independently predict the health-related quality of life (SIS), accounting for 18.8% of the variance.Our study demonstrated that self-perceived UE motor function would be an important component to optimize the rehabilitation programmes aimed at enhancing quality of life and social participation among chronic stroke survivors.

Effects of mirror therapy with electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To provide updated evidence about the effects of MT with ES for recovering upper extremities motor function in people with stroke. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were completed. Methodological quality was assessed using the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials with 773 participants were included in this review. The results demonstrated that MT with ES was more effective than sham (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.89 [1.52-2.26]) and ES alone (SMD, 0.42 [0.11-0.73]) with low quality of evidence, or MT alone (SMD, 0.47[0.04-0.89]) with low quality of evidence for improving upper extremity motor control assessed using Fugl-Meyer Assessment. MT with ES had significant improvement of (MD, 6.47 [1.92-11.01]) the upper extremity gross gripping function assessed using the Action Research Arm Test compared with MT alone with low quality of evidence. MT combined with ES was more effective than sham group (SMD, 1.17 [0.42-1.93) for improving the ability to perform activities of daily living with low quality of evidence assessed using Motor Activity Log. CONCLUSION: MT with ES may be effective in improving upper limb motor recovery in people with stroke.

Combining Mirror Therapy (MT) and Electrical Stimulation (ES) modality could improve upper limb motor control, gross gripping function, and performance in ADLs based on ICF for people with stroke.Those individuals with subacute stroke are recommended as the optimal target group for the combined MT and ES.

Can short-term residential care for stroke rehabilitation help to reduce the institutionalization of stroke survivors?

BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors may not be receiving optimal rehabilitation as a result of a shortage of hospital resources, and many of them are institutionalized. A rehabilitation program provided in a short-term residential care setting may help to fill the service gap. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study were, first, to examine whether there were significant differences in terms of rehabilitation outcomes at 1 year after admission to the rehabilitation program (defined as baseline) between those using short-term residential care (intervention group) and those using usual geriatric day hospital care (control group), and, second, to investigate whether lower 1-year institutionalization rates were observed in the intervention group than in the control group. PARTICIPANTS: 155 stroke survivors who completed at least the first follow-up at 4 months after baseline. INTERVENTION: The intervention group was stroke survivors using self-financed short-term residential care for stroke rehabilitation. The control group was stroke survivors using the usual care at a public geriatric day hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Assessments were conducted by trained research assistants using structured questionnaires at baseline, 4 months, and 1 year after baseline. The primary outcome measures included Modified Barthel Index score, Mini-Mental Status Examination score, and the institutionalization rate. RESULTS: Cognitive status (as measured by Mini-Mental Status Examination score) of patients in both groups could be maintained from 4 months to 1 year, whereas functional status (as measured by Modified Barthel Index score) of the patients could be further improved after 4 months up to 1 year. Meanwhile, insignificant between-group difference in rehabilitation outcomes was observed. The intervention participants had a significantly lower 1-year institutionalization rate (15.8%) than the control group (25.8%). CONCLUSION: Short-term residential care for stroke rehabilitation promoted improvements in rehabilitation outcomes comparable with, if not better than, the usual care at geriatric day hospital. Furthermore, it had a significantly lower 1-year institutionalization rate. This type of service could be promoted to prevent institutionalization.

Intermittent versus indwelling urinary catheterization in older female patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of intermittent and indwelling catheterization in older female patients with urinary retention. METHODS: A randomized, 2-week prospective study in a geriatric rehabilitation ward. Female patients of age 65 years and older with post-voiding residual urine volume (PVRU) persistently > or = 300 ml were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intermittent catheterization (IMC group, n=36) and indwelling catheterization (IDC group, n=45). The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects being catheter-free and had a PVRU < 150 ml on day 14. The secondary outcomes were the time to become catheter-free and the rate of bacteriuria on day 14. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 27 (59.3%) in the IMC group versus 27 out of 39 (69.2%) in the IDC group achieved the primary outcome on day 14 (P=.403) without significant difference in the PVRU. The IMC and IDC groups took a mean of 8.6+/-3.3 and 9.2+/-4.0 days to become catheter-free, respectively (P=.609). Fourteen out of 22 (63.6%) in the IMC group versus 21 out of 34 (61.8%) in the IDC group had bacteriuria on day 14 (P=.888). CONCLUSION: Given the similar success rate of regaining bladder voiding function, the similar rate of bacteriuria and considering that the IMC group only underwent a median of 3 times of intermittent catheterization, we believe that the approach of intermittent urinary catheterization when required would be justified in managing elderly female urinary retention in rehabilitation ward as the presence of indwelling catheters would hinder rehabilitation and adversely affect patient quality of life.