Risk stratification of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated by radiotherapy alone.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors for local and distant relapse and perform risk stratification for patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1031 patients with Stage IB-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with full-course RT but without any chemotherapy were included for analysis. Of these, 311 patients with nonbulky Stage IB-IIA disease were designated the reference group and the other 720 patients were the study group. The associations of stage, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag) level, hemoglobin level, age, cell differentiation, and pelvic lymph node status with treatment failure were evaluated. The independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis. The study group was further stratified into subgroups using combinations of these risk factors. RESULTS: In the study group, independent risk factors for local relapse were advanced stage and age <45 years. The 5-year local relapse-free survival rate was 86% for patients > or =45 years with bulky Stage IB-IIA or IIB disease, and was even greater, up to 90% if the SCC-ag level was <2. In contrast, it was 65% for patients with Stage IIIB who were <45 years old. The independent risk factors for distant failure were advanced stage, SCC-ag level >2, and positive pelvic lymph nodes. The 5-year distant relapse-free survival rate was 83% for patients with bulky Stage IB-IIA and IIB disease, SCC-ag level <2, and negative lymph nodes and 43% for patients with Stage III, SCC-ag level >2, and positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: The risk of treatment failure in advanced-stage cervical cancer patients treated by RT alone can be more precisely predicted by risk stratification. A certain subgroup of patients had better control than the others. The benefit of treating these relatively low-risk patients with additional treatment such as concurrent chemotherapy should be further evaluated in prospective studies or meta-analyses.

Defining the priority of using 18F-FDG PET for recurrent cervical cancer.

UNLABELLED: PET with 18F-FDG has shown its potential in cervical cancer. For maximizing the benefits of this new imaging technology, we aimed to define the prognostic features of recurrent cervical cancer patients for selecting appropriate candidates using 18F-FDG PET. METHODS: Patients enrolled were from 2 independent prospective studies investigating the role of 18F-FDG PET in cervical cancer patients after definitive treatment with documented failure (CTRP-018) or unexplained elevated tumor marker serum levels (CTRP-016) and proven relapse after PET. A total of 55 eligible patients received PET and CT or MRI. Lesion status was determined from pathologic results or clinical follow-up. The benefits calculated were based on treatment that was modified because of the PET findings. The Cox proportional hazards ratio (HR) was used to select independent prognostic covariates. RESULTS: Thirty-six (65.5%) patients had treatment that was modified due to PET. Primary radiation (HR = 14.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.74-77.92), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) > or = 4 ng/mL (HR = 5.82; 95% CI = 1.53-22.04), and presence of symptoms (HR = 6.24; 95% CI = 1.99-19.61) at recurrence were significant factors associated with poor survival. A scoring system using these covariates defined 3 distinct prognostic groups: score < or = 1 (HR = 1.00); score = 2 (HR = 6.91; 95% CI = 1.49-32.14); and score = 3 (HR = 60.46; 95% CI = 9.68-378.09) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Using this risk score, 18F-FDG PET may offer maximal benefits by selecting appropriate recurrent cervical cancer patients for salvage therapy with precise restaging information.