Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China.

BACKGROUND: Quality measurements in primary healthcare (PHC) have become an essential component for improving diabetes outcomes in many high-income countries. However, little is known about their implementation within the Chinese health-system context and how they are perceived by patients, physicians, and policy-makers. We examined stakeholders' perceptions of quality and performance measurements for primary diabetes care in Shanghai, China, and analyzed facilitators and barriers to implementation. METHODS: In-depth interviews with 26 key stakeholders were conducted from 2018 to 2019. Participants were sampled from two hospitals, four community healthcare centers (CHCs), and four institutes involved in regulating CHCs. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data analysis. RESULTS: Existing quality measurements were uniformly implemented via a top-down process, with daily monitoring of family doctors' work and pay-for-performance incentives. Barriers included excluding frontline clinicians from indicator planning, a lack of transparent reporting, and a rigid organizational culture with limited bottom-up feedback. Findings under the CFIR construct "organizational incentives" suggested that current pay-for-performance incentives function as a "double-edged sword," increasing family doctors' motivation to excel while creating pressures to "game the system" among some physicians. When considering the CFIR construct "reflecting and evaluating," policy-makers perceived the online evaluation application - which provides daily reports on family doctors' work - to be an essential tool for improving quality; however, this information was not visible to patients. Findings included under the "network and communication" construct showed that specialists support the work of family doctors by providing training and patient consultations in CHCs. CONCLUSION: The quality of healthcare could be considerably enhanced by involving patients and physicians in decisions on quality measurement. Strengthening hospital-community partnerships can improve the quality of primary care in hospital-centric systems. The case of Shanghai provides compelling policy lessons for other health systems faced with the challenge of improving PHC.

How the health institution combinative contracting mechanism influences community residents' patient experiences in Shanghai: A comparative study of data from two cross-sectional surveys.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the effect of the health institution combinative contracting mechanism (which make participating residents make a "combinative contracting" involving family doctor of community health center, one secondary hospital, and one tertiary hospital) on community residents' patient experiences in Shanghai, China. METHODS: We conducted two questionnaire surveys (2016 and 2018) on the patient experiences of 1200 permanent residents of 12 subdistricts of Shanghai, who were selected via stratified random sampling. Of these, 926 participants were included after propensity score matching. We compared five dimensions of patient experience-accessibility, environment and facilities, service attitude and emotional support, communication and patient engagement, and service integration-before and after implementation of the health institution combinative contracting mechanism in June 2016. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors related to residents' overall experience. RESULTS: The health institution combinative contracting mechanism influenced most dimensions of residents' patient experience, such as accessibility, service attitude and emotional support, communication and patient participation, and service integration. The mechanism in general helped contracted residents obtain a better patient experience than before its implementation. Referral had a significant effect on participants' overall experience. CONCLUSION: Contracted family doctors play active roles in improving nearly every dimension of residents' service experience, as well as their overall experience of services. The health institution combinative contracting mechanism not only increases interaction and strengthens trust between doctors and patients but also makes it possible for residents to obtain integrated health services.