Clinical reading-related oculomotor assessment in visual snow syndrome / Evaluación oculomotora clínica relacionada con la lectura en el síndrome de nieve visual

Purpose: Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a complex neurological condition presenting with an array of sensory, motor, and perceptual dysfunctions and related visual and non-visual symptoms. Recent laboratory studies have found subtle, basic, saccadic-based abnormalities in this population. The objective of the present investigation was to determine if saccadic-related problems could be confirmed and extended using three common clinical reading-related eye movement tests having well-developed protocols and normative databases. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 32 patients (ages 16–56 years) diagnosed with VSS in the first author's optometric practice. There was a battery of three reading-related tests: the Visagraph Reading Eye Movement Test, the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test, and the RightEye Dynamic Vision Assessment Test, all performed using their standard documented protocols and large normative databases. Results: A high frequency of oculomotor deficits was found with all three tests. The greatest percentage was revealed with the Visagraph (56%) and the least with the RightEye (23%). A total of 77% of patients failed at least one of the three tests. Conclusion: The present findings confirm and extend earlier investigations revealing a high frequency of saccadic-based oculomotor problems in the VSS population, now including reading-related tasks. This is consistent with the more general oculomotor/motor problems found in these individuals.(AU)

Distance horizontal fusional facility (DFF): A new diagnostic vergence test for the acquired brain injury (ABI) population

Purpose To report the retrospectively-based, clinical diagnostic findings for the horizontal, distance, fusional facility (DFF) test in the non-TBI (traumatic brain inury), ABI (acquired brain injury) population. Methods The DFF test (4 pd base-out/2 pd base-in) was assessed and compared retrospectively in the first author's optometric practice in three clinical populations: (1) post-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 52), (2) post-ABI, non-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 34), and (3) visually-normal, visually asymptomatic (n = 44). Results The DFF values in each group were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). The mean non-TBI, ABI group value was significantly lower than found in the mTBI group, and both were significantly lower than the mean found in the normal cohort (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in DFF with increased age (p < 0.001). ROC values for the AUC ranged from excellent to acceptable (0.94–0.74). Conclusion The DFF test is a new and useful way to assess horizontal, distance, dynamic, fusional facility in those with presumed non-mTBI, ABI neurological conditions to assist in its diagnosis. (AU)

Clinical reading-related oculomotor assessment in visual snow syndrome.

PURPOSE: Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a complex neurological condition presenting with an array of sensory, motor, and perceptual dysfunctions and related visual and non-visual symptoms. Recent laboratory studies have found subtle, basic, saccadic-based abnormalities in this population. The objective of the present investigation was to determine if saccadic-related problems could be confirmed and extended using three common clinical reading-related eye movement tests having well-developed protocols and normative databases. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 32 patients (ages 16-56 years) diagnosed with VSS in the first author's optometric practice. There was a battery of three reading-related tests: the Visagraph Reading Eye Movement Test, the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test, and the RightEye Dynamic Vision Assessment Test, all performed using their standard documented protocols and large normative databases. RESULTS: A high frequency of oculomotor deficits was found with all three tests. The greatest percentage was revealed with the Visagraph (56%) and the least with the RightEye (23%). A total of 77% of patients failed at least one of the three tests. CONCLUSION: The present findings confirm and extend earlier investigations revealing a high frequency of saccadic-based oculomotor problems in the VSS population, now including reading-related tasks. This is consistent with the more general oculomotor/motor problems found in these individuals.

Distance horizontal fusional facility (DFF): A new diagnostic vergence test for the acquired brain injury (ABI) population.

PURPOSE: To report the retrospectively-based, clinical diagnostic findings for the horizontal, distance, fusional facility (DFF) test in the non-TBI (traumatic brain inury), ABI (acquired brain injury) population. METHODS: The DFF test (4 pd base-out/2 pd base-in) was assessed and compared retrospectively in the first author's optometric practice in three clinical populations: (1) post-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 52), (2) post-ABI, non-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 34), and (3) visually-normal, visually asymptomatic (n = 44). RESULTS: The DFF values in each group were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). The mean non-TBI, ABI group value was significantly lower than found in the mTBI group, and both were significantly lower than the mean found in the normal cohort (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in DFF with increased age (p < 0.001). ROC values for the AUC ranged from excellent to acceptable (0.94-0.74). CONCLUSION: The DFF test is a new and useful way to assess horizontal, distance, dynamic, fusional facility in those with presumed non-mTBI, ABI neurological conditions to assist in its diagnosis.

Orthoptic Vision Therapy: Establishing a Protocol for Management of Diplopia Following Orbital Fracture Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent diplopia following orbital fracture is a well-recognized problem. While observation is the standard-of-care, symptoms may be protracted. Orthoptic vision therapy is a form of ocular physical therapy that achieves functional rehabilitation through targeted exercises. This study presents a protocol for post-traumatic orthoptics and describes preliminary results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protocols for home-therapy/office-assessment were developed using commercial software and exercises targeting motility and fusion. Office-assessment also included validated questionnaire chronicling symptomatology. Healthy-volunteers (n = 10) trailed the protocol three times (n = 30) and normative data was compiled. Comparative measurements were made in chronic (>1year; n = 8) and acute (<2 weeks; n = 4) fracture cohorts. Time-of-therapy was recorded, monetary cost-analysis performed, and side-effects assessed. RESULTS: Severe/moderate motility limitation was found in 3 of 4 acute fracture patients but not in chronic or healthy cohorts. The acute cohort had worse fusion when comparing convergence (mean break/recovery of 8.0/6.5 prism diopters (pd) versus 31.87/21.23pd; P = 0.001/0.015) and divergence (3.00/1.50pd versus 18.37/12.83pd; P = 0.000/0.001) to the healthy cohort. Those with chronic fracture had lower convergence (15.71/5.00pd; P = 0.01/0.001) and divergence (12.29/4.71pd; P = 0.04/0.002) when compared with healthy subjects, but better function than acute patients. Acute fracture patients reported greater symptomatology than chronic (mean score 18.8 versus 4.6; P = 0.003) or healthy (5.0; P = 0.02) groups, but there was no difference between chronic and healthy groups (P = 0.87). Assessment took <10 minutes. Per patient software cost was <$70. Mild eyestrain related to therapy was self-resolving in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptic therapy may improve fusion and motility following orbital fracture. This protocol serves as basis for prospective work.