Regulated expression of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMP in nephrogenesis.

The roles of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their specific inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP), in embryologic development in general, and in nephrogenesis in particular, have not been fully elucidated. The activities of these enzymes and their inhibitors may be critical in the extensive extracellular matrix remodeling that accompanies the formation of the full complement of mature nephrons in the developing kidney. The temporal and spatial expression of two critical basal lamina modifying enzymes, the 72 kDa gelatinase A (MMP-2) and the 92 kDa gelatinase B (MMP-9), as well as TIMP-1, -2, and -3 molecules were evaluated in the developing rat kidney. Additionally, transcripts for the recently described membrane-associated matrix metalloproteinase, MT1-MMP (MMP-14), which can act as an activating receptor for MMP-2/TIMP-2 complexes (Strongin et al.[1995] J. Biol. Chem. 270:5331-5338) were localized by in situ hybridization. Our immunohistochemical data demonstrate distinct localization of MMP-2 within immature nephron structures undergoing epithelial differentiation, while MMP-9 localizes only to the invading vascular structures within immature glomeruli. In contrast, by in situ hybridization, MMP-2 transcripts localize to the background undifferentiated mesenchyme and not to those structures undergoing epithelial differentiation. In a pattern similar to the MMP-2 protein, MT1-MMP transcripts were found within developing epithelial structures. Neither MMP-2, MMP-9 nor MT1-MMP were detected in mature nephrons. TIMP-2 and -3 follow a pattern of expression similar to the MMP-2 protein. We conclude that MMP-2 and TIMP play important roles in the remodeling of basal laminae associated with the epithelial structures of the developing kidney, that these enzymes are temporally and spatially regulated, and that the co-localization of MT1-MMP to sites of basement membrane remodeling suggests a potential role for this molecule as a receptor for and/or modulator of MMP-2/TIMP complexes.

Superior outcomes in pediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Nationally, results of renal transplantation in children, particularly in small children, are inferior to those obtained in adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors important for success in renal transplantation in children. DESIGN: Results of 108 consecutive renal transplantations performed in patients aged 7 months to 18 years were reviewed and compared with those reported by the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS), the national registry. RESULTS: One-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival rates (+/-SE) were 99% +/- 1%, 95% +/- 3%, and 93% +/- 4%, respectively, for living donor grafts and 97% +/- 3%, 92% +/- 6%, and 92% +/- 6%, respectively, for cadaver grafts. Incidence of acute rejection was half that reported by NAPRTCS. There were no graft losses for technical reasons (19% in NAPRTCS). Twelve percent of patients were younger than 2 years (6% in NAPRTCS); 17% were 2 to 5 years old (16% in NAPRTCS). Most small children received an adult-sized kidney. Ninety-three percent of recipients weighing 15 kg or less received postoperative mechanical ventilation assistance to optimize fluid resuscitation and perfusion of adult-sized kidneys. Structural abnormalities of the urinary tract were present in 53.7% of the patients (48.5% in NAPRTCS; adults, 5.3%). Nephroureterectomy was required in 38 children; in 27 (71%) of them, it was performed at the time of transplant surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent results can be obtained in pediatric renal transplantation by strict adherence to surgical detail, tight immunosuppressive management, aggressive fluid management in the small child, and careful integration of urologic and transplant surgery.

Kidney and kidney/pancreas transplantation at Stanford University Medical Center.

The disparity between the supply of cadaveric donors and the demand for renal allografts continues to grow. We have taken a multifaceted approach to increase the allograft pool: 1. Spiral computed tomography to evaluate potential living kidney donors is safer, less invasive, less expensive and more time efficient and thus should encourage living organ donation. 2. Use of selected expanded criteria cadaveric donor kidneys (aged 60 or over, hypertensive) in size- and age-matched recipients have short-term function at 3 and 6 months comparable to standard cadaveric renal allografts. 3. Kidneys from expanded criteria donors over age 59 and with an adjusted creatinine clearance less than 90 ml/min should be used as a dual kidney transplant into an appropriate sized- and aged-matched recipient. 4. Kidneys from pediatric donors < 5 years of age should be utilized as en-bloc grafts, when transplanted into adult recipients. Pediatric renal transplantation poses numerous challenges given the different and problematic etiologies of ESRD, the surgical considerations in small children and infants and the enhanced immune response witnessed in children. Nevertheless, renal transplantation is clearly the therapy of choice for children with ESRD and excellent results can be obtained through strict adherence to surgical detail, tight immunosuppressive management, and aggressive fluid management in infants and small children. We feel it is also critically important that transplantation and follow-up care be carried out by an integrated and experienced surgical and medical team. Managed healthcare has had profound effects on the practice and management of transplantation centers. The one area of greatest impact has been the pressure upon programs to reduce their cost of transplantation. We have initiated a number of new outpatient treatment protocols as part of an effort to contain costs. Most patients with acute rejection are evaluated (including transplant kidney biopsy) and treated in an ambulatory setting. Completion of OKT3 therapy in selected patients is also performed at home through visiting nurses or at our ambulatory care center. Additionally, treatment of CMV disease is now performed almost exclusively on an outpatient basis.

Bladder augmentation can be problematic with renal failure and transplantation.

Ten consecutive patients with failure of urinary bladder augmentation (UBA) performed either prior to or after reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were studied. Seven patients developed increased hydroureteronephrosis, infectious complications, and advanced to ESRD after UBA. The mean time to development of ESRD in patients who had UBA performed with moderate chronic renal failure (CRF) was 1.8 years. The UBAs in all seven patients were taken down prior to transplantation. Subsequently, five of these UBA-takedown patients have received kidney grafts and all have stable, good renal function. Three patients had their UBA performed after they reached ESRD, in preparation for renal transplantation. All three of these patients experienced recurrent urosepsis following transplantation, resulting in death in one patient and loss of graft in another. The third patient will undergo takedown of the UBA. This study suggests that UBA may possibly not be the best option for patients with moderate CRF and those awaiting transplantation.