Acupuncture versus tricyclic antidepressants in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headaches: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing attack frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but its effectiveness relative to first-line drugs for TTH is unknown, which impedes the recommendation of acupuncture for patients who are intolerant to drugs for TTH. We aimed to estimate the relative effectiveness between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) through indirect treatment comparison (ITC) meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of TCAs or acupuncture in the prevention of TTH in adults were included. The primary outcome was headache frequency. The secondary outcomes were headache intensity, responder rate, and adverse event rate. Bayesian random-effect models were used to perform ITC meta-analysis, and confidence of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 34 trials involving 4426 participants were included. Acupuncture had similar effect with TCAs in decreasing TTH frequency (amitriptyline: mean difference [MD] -1.29, 95% CI -5.28 to 3.02; amitriptylinoxide: MD -0.05, 95% CI -6.86 to 7.06) and reducing TTH intensity (amitriptyline: MD 2.35, 95% CI -1.20 to 5.78; clomipramine: MD 1.83, 95% CI -4.23 to 8.20). Amitriptyline had a higher rate of adverse events than acupuncture (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.42 to 14.23). CONCLUSION: Acupuncture had similar effect as TCAs in reducing headache frequency of TTH, and acupuncture had a lower adverse events rate than amitriptyline, as shown by very low certainty of evidence.

Causal relationship between gut microbiota and urticaria: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.

Background: Cumulative evidence showed an association between gut microbiota and urticaria, but the causal relationship between them is unclear. We aimed to verify whether there is a causal relationship between the composition of gut microbiota and urticaria and explore whether the causal effect was bidirectional. Methods: We obtained genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data of 211 gut microbiota and urticaria from the most extensive available GWAS database. A bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) study was used to test the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and urticaria. The MR analysis was primarily performed with the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, and MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), and MR-PRESSO were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: The Phylum Verrucomicrobia (OR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.61; p = 0.04), Genus Defluviitaleaceae UCG011 (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.59; p = 0.02), and Genus Coprococcus 3 (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.02 to 2.05; p = 0.04) was a risk effect against urticaria. And Order Burkholderiales (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.49 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and Genus Eubacterium xylanophilum group (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.99; p = 0.04) were negatively associated with urticaria, suggesting a protective effect. At the same time, urticaria had a positively causal effect on gut microbiota (Genus Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group) (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.16; p = 0.02). These findings showed no influence by heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Moreover, most sensitivity analyses showed results consistent with those of IVW analysis. Conclusion: Our MR study confirmed the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and urticaria, and the causal effect was bidirectional. Nevertheless, these findings warrant further examination owing to the unclear mechanisms.

Efficacy of acupuncture for tension-type headache prophylaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been shown to reduce tension-type headache (TTH) frequency in previous studies. Nevertheless, repeated significance testing might inflate type I error. We aimed to verify the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in reducing TTH frequency by meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS: Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched until September 29, 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture, no acupuncture, or other active therapies in adults with TTH were included. The primary outcome was TTH frequency. The secondary outcomes were responder rate and adverse event. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 2795 participants were included. Acupuncture had more reduction than sham acupuncture in TTH frequency, both after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] - 0.80, 95% CI - 1.36 to - 0.24, P = 0.005) and at the follow-up period (SMD - 1.33, 95% CI - 2.18 to - 0.49, P = 0.002), while TSA showed the included sample size did not exceed required information size (RIS). Acupuncture was superior over no acupuncture after treatment (SMD - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.63 to - 0.41, P < 0.001), and cumulative sample size reached RIS. In terms of responder rate, acupuncture had a higher responder rate compared with sham acupuncture both after treatment (relative ratio [RR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.46, P = 0.0003) and the follow-up period (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.58, P < 0.0001), but the sample size is inadequate. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture is an efficacious and safe treatment for TTH prevention, but this conclusion might be limited by the generally very low to low quality evidence. TSA suggested that high-quality trials are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture.

Dietary interventions for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Dietary therapies are recommended for the treatment of pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs), but the comparative effectiveness among them is unclear. Therefore, the main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of differential dietary therapies in pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to February 28, 2023. Randomized clinical trials of dietary treatments for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders were included. The primary outcome was the improvement in abdominal pain. The secondary outcomes were changes in pain intensity and pain frequency. Thirty-one studies after screening 8695 retrieved articles were included, and 29 studies were available for network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, fiber (RR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.77 to 13.32; P-score = 0.84), synbiotics (RR, 3.92; 95%CI, 1.65 to 9.28; P-score = 0.75), and probiotics (RR, 2.18; 95%CI, 1.46 to 3.26; P-score = 0.46) had significantly larger effect on the improvement in abdominal pain, the three treatments had larger effect than placebo but statistically insignificant in difference in improving pain frequency and intensity. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the dietary treatments after indirect comparisons of the three outcomes.  Conclusion: Fiber supplements, synbiotics, and probiotics were efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children, suggested by very low or low evidence. The evidence of the efficacy of probiotics is more convincing than fiber and synbiotics when sample size and statistical power were considered. No difference in the efficacy of the three treatments. High-quality trials are needed to further investigate the efficacy of dietary interventions. What is Known: • Multiple dietary treatment options are available for functional abdominal pain disorders in the pediatric population, of which the most beneficial one is currently unknown. What is New: • This NMA found very low to low certainty of the evidence suggesting that fiber, synbiotics, and probiotics might be more efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children than the other dietary treatments. • There were no significant differences between active dietary treatments for changes in abdominal pain intensity.

Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice in China. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their efficacy, but it has rarely been compared with first-line antispasmodics to verify their effectiveness. Therefore, we compare acupuncture with antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS by using an adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. Methods: Embase, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to 14 March 2022, with no language restrictions. RCTs comparing antispasmodics or acupuncture with placebo or one of the antispasmodics were enrolled. The primary outcome of interest was the improvement of abdominal pain. And the secondary outcomes of interest were the relief of global IBS symptoms and adverse events. The random-effects model was utilized to pool data. The effect size was measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative ratio, and the effectiveness of acupuncture and different antispasmodics were ranked by P-scores. Results: Thirty-five RCTs (n = 5,190) were included. The analysis showed that cimetropium, drotaverine, acupuncture, and pinarverium were superior over placebo in relieving abdominal pain; cimetropium (SMD, -3.00 [95%CI, -4.47 to -1.53], P-score = 0.99) ranked the most effective. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture had a greater improvement than most antispasmodics except cimetropium and drotaverine in relieving abdominal pain, although the between-group difference was statistically insignificant. In the analysis of continuous outcome in the relief of global IBS symptoms, the result showed that pinaverium was more effective (SMD, 1.72 [95%CI, 0.53 to 2.92], P-score = 0.90) than placebo. Trimebutine and acupuncture had greater improvements than placebo, but no significant difference was shown between groups. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture was more effective than pinaverium (SMD, -1.11 [95%CI, -1.94 to -0.28]) in relieving global IBS symptoms. In the analysis of adverse events, acupuncture had a lower adverse event rate than most of the other antispasmodics. Conclusion: Cimetropium, drotaverine, and acupuncture were all better than placebo in improving abdominal pain. Acupuncture was preferred over pinaverium in relieving global IBS symptoms, and acupuncture had lower adverse events than most antispasmodics.

Low FODMAP Diet and Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis.

Background: Probiotic and low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol (FODMAP) diet are two commonly used management approaches for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to evaluate the most effective combinations and components among different probiotics or low FODMAP diet through component network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: We searched Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science from inception to 21 January 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of probiotics and low FODMAP diet for IBS were included, with placebo, sham diet, or conventional treatments as controls. Binary outcomes were compared among treatments using the relative ratio (RR). A minimally contextualized framework recommended by the GRADE group was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. The primary efficacy outcome was the relief of global IBS symptoms, and the secondary efficacy outcome was the reduction in IBS symptom scores or abdominal pain scores. Key Results: We included 76 RCTs (n = 8058) after screening 1940 articles. Eight RCTs were classified as low risk of bias. Standard network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that Lactobacillus (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.48) and Bifidobacterium (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-3.07) were the most effective for the primary efficacy outcome (high certainty evidence); component NMA showed that Bacillus (RR 5.67, 95% CI 1.88 to 17.08, p = 0.002) and Lactobacillus (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91, p = 0.017) were among the most effective components. The results of standard NMA and CNMA analysis of the improvement of overall IBS symptom scores or abdominal pain scores were consistent with this finding. Conclusion: Lactobacillus was the most effective component for the relief of IBS symptoms; Bifidobacterium and Bacillus were possibly effective and need further verification. Systematic Review Registration: website, identifier registration number.

Eluxadoline Versus Antispasmodics in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis.

Objective: Eluxadoline is a newly approved drug for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but it has rarely been compared with positive controls. We aimed to compare eluxadoline with antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS. Methods: We searched the OVID Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing eluxadoline or antispasmodics with placebo. The search was conducted from 1 January 1980, to 1 September 2020, without any language restrictions. The primary efficacy outcome was the relief of abdominal pain, defined by a reduction of pain scores of at least 30% from baseline. The secondary efficacy outcome was the relief of global IBS symptoms, defined by a composite response of a decrease in abdominal pain and improvement in stool consistency on the same day for at least 50% of the days assessed. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. Outcome estimates were pooled by using Risk Ratios (RRs) and P-scores. Results: Forty-two trials with 8,457 participants were included from 45 articles. Compared with placebo, each of drotaverine, pinaverium, alverine combined with simethicone (ACS) and eluxadoline 100 mg was highly effective in the relief of abdominal pain, with drotaverine [RR, 2.71 (95% CI, 1.70 to 4.32), P-score = 0.95] ranking first. Drotaverine, otilonium, cimetropium, pinaverium, and eluxadoline 100 mg had significantly high the relief of global IBS symptomss, for which drotaverine [RR, 2.45 (95% CI, 1.42 to 4.22), P-score = 0.95] was ranked first. No significant difference was found between these interventions. Pinaverium had a significantly higher the relief of global IBS symptoms than eluxadoline [RR, 1.72 (95% CI, 1.33 to 2.21)] on sensitivity analysis. However, no significant difference was found in the number of adverse events between each intervention and the placebo. Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis showed that eluxadoline 100 mg was at least as effective as antispasmodics in relieving abdominal pain in IBS. But eluxadoline had more reported adverse events. Antispasmodics are still the first choice for the treatment of IBS.