Evaluation of Radiation Protection Methods for Assistant Staff during CT Imaging in High-energy Trauma: Lens Dosimetry with a Phantom Study.

ABSTRACT: Staff are exposed to radiation in the scanning room when assisting with CT scans of patients requiring ventilatory support during procedures. We measured lens doses using a phantom during a high-energy trauma protocol. Dosimetry showed that the unprotected lens received 2.02 mGy on the right and 1.91 mGy on the left, which are not negligible doses. Respective exposures to the right and left lens were 53.6% and 55.1% when wearing 0.07 mm Pb protective glasses with side covers; 53.7% and 64.2% when wearing 0.7 mm Pb glasses without side covers when facing away from the patient couch; and 92.1% and 91.2% using protective shielding in the gantry. Since the face direction may change during assistance with CT imaging, it is desirable that the protective glasses have a shape with a side cover. The protective shielding had a major radiation reduction effect, although it is expensive to acquire, install, and maintain.

[Fundamental Study of Inflation Pressure Resistance in an Angiographical Tube].

This study was designed to clarify the relation between the pressure resistance of an angiographical tube and the amount of contrast medium injected under a connected microcatheter used for interventional radiology (IVR). We investigated the injection pressure and the expansion rate at the center of the tube during contrast enhancement by setting the power injector to 1200 PSI pressure, with 2.0 ml/s injection speed, 10 ml injection volume, 5.0 s injection time, and 0 s rise time for tubes with different pressure resistance performance (low or high). Then we examined the amount of contrast medium material discharged from the microcatheter. The low-pressure resistant tube (less than 140 PSI) injection pressure exceeded the pressure performance. The expansion rate increased to 49%, presenting a risk of rupture. The injection pressure of the high-pressure resistant tube (less than 1200 PSI) was within the pressure-resistance performance. The expansion rate increased to 38%. However, when the contrast medium discharge amount contributing to the image was measured within the injection time under the condition of 10 ml injection for 5.0 s, the former was 2.3 ml and the latter was 4.2 ml. The entire amount was not discharged during the injection period. It became apparent that it is discharged in drips after some time. Results show that the tube expansion caused retention of the contrast medium inside, which decreases the actual amount of the injected contrast medium. From the results, we infer the possibility of preventing reduction of the injected contrast medium amount attributable to expansion.