RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The successful conduct of fiberoptic aided intubation is dependent upon effective local anaesthesia. The aim of the study was to compare three different methods of anaesthetizing the airway. METHODS: 60 adult patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists status I-III and Mallampati class III & IV), scheduled for elective surgery, received sedation followed by spraying of the nares and posterior pharyngeal wall with 4% lignocaine. Thereafter the patients received 4 ml of 4% lignocaine either by transtracheal injection (n=20, group A), via intubating fiberscope (Pentax F1-10P2) using 'spray as you go' technique (n=20, group B) or by nebulizer (Devilbiss 5610W) 20 min before intubation, (n=20, group C). Patients were asked to score the procedure using visual analog scale (VAS) and severity scores. Episodes of coughing, choking, stridor, extra / total local anaesthetic used and intubation times were recorded. Patients were monitored continuously for vital parameters. RESULTS: Group B patients showed better VAS scores with shorter intubation times and had a lower incidence of coughing and choking. The endoscopists' VAS scores also showed a preference for group B. CONCLUSION: In conclusion the 'spray as you go' technique was safe, provided effective local anaesthesia and was preferred by both patients and endoscopists.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are now an acceptable therapeutic option for those patients with irreversible hearing loss and deaf-mutism. The surgery is time consuming and complicated. Hence, the technique of anaesthesia plays a crucial role in success of cochlear implant surgery. Cochlear implant patients have various types of syndromes which are important from anaesthetic as well as surgical point of view. Pre-implant preparation requires objective assessment of hearing, plain X-rays of skull and a CT scan of the temporal bone. Anaesthesia is required for objective assessment of hearing in children under five years of age, to obtain X-rays of skull, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT scan, brain evoked response audiometry (BERA) testing and finally for cochlear implant surgery. Anaesthetic considerations include preoperative familiarisation with the patient and his family. Syndromal illnesses have specific anaesthetic significance such as presence of difficult airway or prolonged QT interval. Parental presence is highly desirable during induction of anaesthesia. Electro-surgical instruments especially monopolar ones, should not be used once the cochlear implant is in place. METHODS: In our institution, all cases (15 children) received their cochlear implants under general anaesthesia and formed the study group. Children were administered midazolam orally and inj ketamine during CT scan. Our techniques of general anaesthesia were modified to permit use of nerve stimulators during surgery. To minimise the incidence of vertigo particularly after cochleostomy, postoperative nausea and vomiting, all patients received glycopyrrolate and fentanyl citrate intravenously prior to induction. Other agents used were, thiopentone, suxamethonium and end-tidal 1.3 MAC halothane in 1:2 mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (O2 and N2O). Electro diathermy was switched off, before the cochlear device was implanted on the patient. Patients were allowed to breathe spontaneously whenever nerve stimulator was used to locate the facial nerve. Inj Ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg was used as anti-emetic agent. Postoperative pain relief was initially provided with fentanyl 1 µg/kg IV and later with syrup ibuprofen. RESULTS: There were no remarkable anaesthetic or surgical complication in our series except perilymph leakage in two cases.
