Anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory epilepsy: Preliminary results in our first 5 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nucleus (ATN) has been recognized to be an efficient treatment of refractory epilepsy (RE). However, ATN targeting is difficult and up to 8% of lead misplacement is reported. Our objective is to report our surgical procedure based on MRI targeting and our clinical results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our first five consecutive patients (4M, 1F, mean age: 42.8 years) treated by DBS of ATN between March and October 2016 were included. The mean duration of their epilepsy was 29 years. Four patients had already vagal nerve stimulation and 2 mammillary body stimulation. Stereotactic coordinates were calculated using distal segment of mammillothalamic tract as landmark. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia with intraoperative control of lead position using a robotic 3D fluoroscopy and image fusion with the preoperative MRI. RESULTS: No complications or lead misplacement was observed. The mean 3D distance between the planned target and location of the lead was 1.8 mm. Each patient was followed up at least one year (15+3months). The stimulation parameters were: 140Hz, 90m/s and 5 Volts with one minute ON/five minutes OFF cycle. The mean reduction of seizure frequency reached -52.5% (+32.2) at 6-months but decreased to -24.5% (+65.7) at the last follow-up due to some adverse events not related to stimulation. CONCLUSION: No complication, no lead misplacement and the improvement in our first patients, previously not help by multiple medications or surgeries, are encouraging.

Invasive EEG in refractory epilepsy: insertion of subdural grids through linear craniectomy reduces complications and remains effective.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate our technique of implanting subdural grids by linear craniectomy under computer-assisted navigation for invasive electroencephalography in medically refractory epilepsy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We report results from our first 38 consecutive patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent subdural grids implantation by linear craniectomy. For each case, a preoperative MRI was performed for navigation followed by a postoperative MRI for localization control of the intracranial electrode contacts. A linear skin incision, adapted to the depth and type of subdural electrode (strip or grid) and compatible with possible subsequent therapeutic surgery, was carried out. One or two linear craniectomies (maximal length 6cm, width 1cm) were then drilled with a bevel. The dura mater was incised under microscopic guidance to avoid opening the arachnoid. The required subdural electrodes were then slipped subdurally through each linear craniectomy (letter-box technique). RESULTS: Forty-one invasive electroencephalographies were performed with 28 (68%) bilateral. For all invasive electroencephalographies, at least one subdural grid was implanted. Sixty-one subdural grids were implanted in total, 52 with 20 contacts and nine with 32 contacts. No cerebrospinal fluid leakage, no infection, no neurological deficit and no permanent complications were observed. Three subdural grids (5%) were not positioned exactly as planned but this had no consequence for the invasive electroencephalography analysis. CONCLUSION: The implantation of 61 consecutive subdural grids for invasive electroencephalography through linear craniectomies was associated with no transient or permanent complications in this population. This letter-box technique appears to be practical and safe without limiting explorative efficacy.