Quality of life and prognosis in heart failure: results of the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST).

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) was a prespecified secondary end point in the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial. The Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial used four QOL questionnaires to evaluate patient health status over time in response to treatment with placebo or bucindolol. The goal of the current study was to determine the relationship between the different questionnaires, assess the effect of treatment on health status, and evaluate the association between changes in health status and prognosis. METHODS: The San Diego Heart Failure (SDHF), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and Physician Global Assessment (PhyGA) questionnaires were measured at baseline through 48 months of follow-up. For SDHF and MLHF, changes from baseline were calculated. Spearman correlation was used to assess relationships, and Cox Proportional Hazards regression was used to predict time to all-cause mortality, and mortality or heart failure hospitalization, bivariately and multivariately. To determine whether beta-blocker treatment affected QOL, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare treatment groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, SDHF (r = +0.56, P = .0001), PGA (r = +0.36, P = .0001), and PhyGA (r = +0.37, P = .0001) correlated with MLHF. SDHF (P = .0001), MLHF (P = .0004), PGA (P = .0001), and PhyGA (P = .0001) were all strongly associated with all-cause mortality, with low values of each associated with a lower hazard. For the combined end point of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, change in QOL with each instrument had a P value of .0001. At 12 months, bucindolol-treated patients had improvement in both PhyGA and PGA compared with placebo; neither the SDHF nor the MLWF instrument distinguished between the two treatment groups unless a worst-rank assignment was used for patients who died. CONCLUSION: The four instruments correlate with each other and predict clinical end points, suggesting that each is a valid measure of health status. According to the PGA and the PhyGA, bucindolol improves QOL.

Relationship between waist circumference, body mass index, and medical care costs.

OBJECTIVE: Excessive visceral adiposity as measured by anthropomorphic measures may be more closely associated with adverse health consequences than body weight or body mass index (BMI), the more commonly obtained clinical measures. Waist circumference (WC) provides information about regional adiposity and may correlate with health care costs better than body weight or BMI. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A total of 424 men (37%) and women (63%) were identified as they were seen in outpatient medical clinics at Denver Health, an integrated health care system serving a largely indigent population. Height, weight, and WC were measured by one examiner. Information on outpatient, laboratory, pharmacy, inpatient, and total charges attributable to each subject for the preceding year were obtained from computerized databases. Data on health care charges were divided into quartiles based on WC and BMI. RESULTS: Total annual health care charges were significantly greater in the highest WC quartile (WC < 83.3 cm: $6062 +/- $784; 83.3 to 93.5 cm: $5968 +/- $812; 93.7 to 103.5 cm: $6369 +/- $1015; >103.5 cm: $8699 +/- $1092; p = 0.047). Those with a WC >103.5 cm generated 85% more inpatient charges than the group with a WC <83.3 cm. Although there was a positive trend, BMI was not found to significantly correlate with total health care charges in this population sample. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that abdominal adiposity as assessed by WC is associated with increased total health care charges and may be a better predictor of health care charges than the more widely used BMI.