Screening of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Although coronary angiography (CA) is the gold standard for coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) screening, non-invasive modalities have arisen as potential alternatives, such as coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). CCTA also quantifies plaque burden, which may influence medical treatment. From January 2021 to April 2022, we prospectively included heart transplant recipients who performed CCTA as a first-line method for CAV detection in a single center. Clinical, CCTA, and CA data were collected. 38 patients were included, 60.5% men, aged 58±14 years. The most frequent cause of transplantation was dilated cardiomyopathy (42.1%), and the median graft duration was 10 years [interquartile range (IQR) 9]. The median left ventricle ejection fraction was 61.5% (IQR 6). The median calcium score was 17 (IQR 231) and 32 patients (84.2%) proceeded to CCTA: 7, 24, and 1 patients had a graded CAV of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Most patients (37.5%) had both calcified and non-calcified plaques, and the median number of affected segments was 2 (IQR 3). The remaining six patients had extensive coronary calcification, so CA was performed: 4 had CAV1, 1 had CAV2, and 1 had CAV3. During follow-up (12.2±4.2 months), there were neither deaths nor acute coronary syndromes. After CCTA, therapeutic changes occurred in about 10 (26.3%) of patients, mainly related to anti-lipid intensification; such changes were more frequent in patients with diabetes after heart transplant. In this cohort, CCTA led to therapeutic changes in about one-quarter of patients; more studies are needed to assess how CCT may guide therapy according to plaque burden.

Interventional cardiology in cancer patients: A position paper from the Portuguese Cardiovascular Intervention Association and the Portuguese Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

The field of Cardio-Oncology has grown significantly, especially during the last decade. While awareness of cardiotoxicity due to cancer disease and/or therapies has greatly increased, much of the attention has focused on myocardial systolic disfunction and heart failure. However, coronary and structural heart disease are also a common issue in cancer patients and encompass the full spectrum of cardiotoxicity. While invasive percutaneous or surgical intervention, either is often needed or considered in cancer patients, limited evidence or guidelines are available for dealing with coronary or structural heart disease. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions consensus document published in 2016 is the most comprehensive document regarding this particular issue, but relevant evidence has emerged since, which render some of its considerations outdated. In addition to that, the recent 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology only briefly discuss this topic. As a result, the Portuguese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology have partnered to produce a position paper to address the issue of cardiac intervention in cancer patients, focusing on percutaneous techniques. A brief review of available evidence is provided, followed by practical considerations. These are based both on the literature as well as accumulated experience with these types of patients, as the authors are either interventional cardiologists, cardiologists with experience in the field of Cardio-Oncology, or both.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients developing severe mitral regurgitation early after an acute myocardial infarction: A review.

Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) may develop in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) because of papillary muscle dysfunction or rupture. Severe acute MR in this scenario is a life-threatening complication associated with hemodynamic instability and pulmonary edema, and has been linked to a worse prognosis even after reperfusion. Patients treated solely with medical therapy have the highest mortality rates. Surgery has been the only treatment strategy until recently, but the results of the technique are hindered by high rates of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the development of less invasive interventions for correcting MR would be ideal. We aimed to review the current role of transcatheter interventions in this clinical setting.