Social and self-stigma during COVID-19 pandemic: Egyptians' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Social stigma associated with infectious diseases existed throughout the history of pandemics due to fears of contagion and death. This study aims to assess social and self-stigma resulting from COVID-19 infection and other associated factors in Egypt during the pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 533 adult Egyptians via an online questionnaire. The questionnaire included social stigma toward current and recovered COVID-19 patients and the negative self-image of being a COVID-19 patient. RESULTS: The mean calculated overall COVID-19-related stigma score for the studied sample was 4.7±3.1. The highest reported stigma category was mild stigma: Social stigma towards current COVID-19 patients (88.2%), Social stigma toward recovered COVID-19 patients (64.2%), Negative self-image for being a COVID-19 patient; perceived self-stigma (71.6%) and total stigma score (88.2%) respectively. The overall stigma score was negatively associated with a higher level of education and getting information from healthcare workers and positively associated with getting information from social networks. CONCLUSION: Social and self-stigma related to COVID-19 infection was mild from the Egyptian perspective but found in a large proportion of the population and mainly affected by getting information from healthcare workers or through social media and being more among those with lower education levels. The study recommends more legislative control on social media for disseminating health-related information and conducting awareness campaigns to counteract these adverse effects.

Barriers to adequate nutrition care for child malnutrition in a low-resource setting: Perspectives of health care providers.

Introduction: Several studies in developing countries found that more need-based training is required for health care providers (HCPs) in child malnutrition management. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted to explore barriers to providing adequate nutrition care as perceived by the healthcare providers (HCPs) in the child malnutrition clinic at a Children's University Hospital in Egypt. Participants were selected using the purposive sampling technique. Five out of seven HCPs in the clinic were included (two male physicians, one female physician, and two female nurses). Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews. The interview guide consisted of semi-structured open-ended questions. Quantitative data were the resulting scores from the scoring system used to assess the understandability and actionability of the patient education materials (PEMs) that are available in the clinic. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) for the scoring. Statistical analysis: The thematic content analysis technique was employed for qualitative data. The percent score was generated for the PEM actionability and understandability for quantitative data. Results: Most common child malnutrition conditions encountered by HCPs were nutritional deficiencies. Barriers to the delivery of adequate nutrition care to children were physician-centered: limited nutrition education in the medical school, health system-centered: an insufficient number of HCPs, lack of nutritional supplements, lack of patient education materials (PEMs) that suit the characteristics of the served community, lack of updated standard of practice (SOP) and guidelines, inadequate nutrition training of HCPs, and insufficient time for each patient, and caregivers-centered: the low socioeconomic status and false cultural, nutritional beliefs. Conclusion: There are different barriers to adequate nutrition care for child malnutrition in low-resource healthcare settings. Mainly nutritional deficiencies. Most of the barriers were health system-related in the form of insufficient resources (shortage of workforce; concerning the high caseload, nutritional supplements, and PEMs) and inadequate management of resources (lack of skill-based training, lack of updated SOP and guidelines, and lack of properly designed PEMs that facilitate communication with the target caregivers).

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Cervical Cancer Screening, and HPV Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Although cervical cancer is potentially preventable, lack of knowledge and poor attitude among healthcare professionals toward cervical cancer screening and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination can result in underutilization of these preventive strategies. Then, the objective of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical cancer and its prevention through Pap test screening and HPV vaccination among obstetricians and gynecologists (Ob-Gyns). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 250 Egyptian attendees of a national Ob-Gyns professional conference. Data collection was performed using a pre-designed self-administered questionnaire, which tested participants' knowledge, attitude, and practices related to cervical cancer, Pap test screening, and HPV vaccination. RESULTS: The study included 41.2% Ob-Gyns specialists and 37.6% of consultants from secondary and tertiary care hospitals or centers. About 45% of participants had poor-to-fair knowledge, 57% had negative-to-fair positive attitudes toward cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, and 44% had ever-performed Pap test, while 45% of participants had ever-prescribed the HPV vaccine to their patients. Physicians' knowledge and attitude were significantly associated with their age, professional level, work experience, and place of work. Although performing cervical cancer screening was significantly more common among older, more experienced, and highly professional participants, HPV vaccine prescription was associated with young, less experienced participants at lower educational and professional levels. CONCLUSION: Ob-Gyns had poor-to-fair knowledge, Attitude, and practices related to cervical cancer, Pap test screening, and HPV vaccination.

World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist with Addition of Infection Control Items: Intervention Study in Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Surgical team is in command of the operating room (OR) and takes decisions regarding various patient care procedures. Educational programs directed to them, should be creative, provocative and tailored to their specific needs and the expected outcomes. AIM: This study aims to design and conduct an educational program of patient safety and infection control for the OR team based on the WHO surgical safety checklist and to assess their post-intervention knowledge and practices. METHODS: This interventional study was conducted at the ORs of Port-said general hospital. It passed through three stages; baseline assessment of knowledge and practice regarding patient safety and infection control among OR team (surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses), intervention stage in which an educational program based on the WHO surgical safety checklist with modifications and additions of more infection control items was conducted, then re-assessment of their post-intervention knowledge and practices. RESULTS: All the studied participants showed improvement in both knowledge and practices of patient safety and infection control after the educational program based on the WHO surgical safety checklist with modifications and additions of more infection control items and including not only practices but also knowledge as well, than before. CONCLUSION: The modification of the WHO surgical safety checklist to fit local knowledge and practices created a comprehensive tool that led to an improvement in both knowledge and practices of patient safety and infection control among the OR team.