Evaluating the importance of a core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy: A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: The need for a global core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy is important due to the rapidly changing nature of health care delivery internationally and the need to standardize advanced practice physiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of a proposed international core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of advanced practice physiotherapists across seven countries. The importance of each competency and capability was rated on a five-point agreement Likert scale. Participants were from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Switzerland and Argentina. RESULTS: A total of 99 participants completed the survey, comprising 63% (57/90) females and 33% (30/90) males. Sixty percent, 60% (54/90), had over 20 years of experience. The survey participants represented a diverse geographic distribution, with 25% (23/90) from Australia, 25% (23/90) from Canada, 18% (6/90) from New Zealand, and 18% (6/90) from the United Kingdom. Four percent 4% (4/90) from Ireland, and 4% (4/90) from other countries (Switzerland and Argentina). The survey revealed a strong consensus among participants, with all competencies and capabilities ranked as high and considered important to advanced practice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a consensus among advanced practice physiotherapists across seven countries on the importance of a proposed competency and capability framework. The findings highlight the need for a global standard in advanced practice physiotherapy, particularly in light of the rapidly changing healthcare landscape.

Identifying competencies for an advanced practice physiotherapy role within an interprofessional chronic pain clinic.

BACKGROUND: Advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) models of care have shown success in access, safety, satisfaction, and care quality for musculoskeletal pain conditions in various settings. Yet, there is a gap in defining competencies for physiotherapists to be the initial point of contact for people with chronic pain. This study aims to identify and agree upon the competencies necessary for a physiotherapist to fulfill the role of an APP in an interprofessional chronic pain clinic. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted using a Nominal Group Technique and a modified Delphi process. Consensus on the competency, defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants, was sought. RESULTS: Twenty-three experts (17 healthcare providers and six individuals with chronic pain) participated in the focus group discussions. Twenty completed the follow-up Delphi surveys. Ten essential competencies for an APP role in interprofessional chronic pain clinics were identified and achieved consensus: 1) use an evidence-based approach to practice; 2) communicate effectively with the patient; 3) perform a comprehensive assessment; 4) determine pain-related diagnoses; 5) develop therapeutic relationships; 6) provide appropriate care; 7) support patients through transitions in care; 8) collaborate with members of the interprofessional team; 9) advocate for the needs of the patients; and 10) use a reflective approach to practice. CONCLUSION: This study identified ten competencies essential for physiotherapists to fulfill an APP role within interprofessional chronic pain clinics. These competencies serve as a foundation for informing a training program and future research evaluating the effectiveness of the APP model in this setting.

Developing an international competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy: a scoping review with narrative synthesis.

INTRODUCTION: The need to address increasing numbers of people seeking care, insufficient numbers of physicians, and providing high-value and sustainable care has contributed to changing physiotherapy practice across the world, often referred to as advanced practice physiotherapy. Currently, there is no internationally standardized competency and capability framework to support advanced practice physiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review has two aims; 1) To identify and map out the competencies of advanced practice physiotherapy available in the literature. 2) To develop a competency and capability framework by mapping the competencies identified from the review. DESIGN: The Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA Scoping review methodology were used. Databases searched included CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE Ovid, PubMed, and Scopus. The competency and capability framework was developed through a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Nineteen documents were included in the final review, with 13 grey literature (government reports, policy documents, thesis) and six research papers. Included publications came from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The included documents covered predominantly musculoskeletal practice (n = 17). The others focused on cardiorespiratory care, incontinence and pelvic health. Through narrative synthesis, 27 competencies and capabilities were identified and grouped under seven domains. CONCLUSION: The synthesis of this scoping review provides the first competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy that integrates competencies and capabilities from five different countries. With the expansion of advanced practice physiotherapy, the framework developed from this review is the first step towards international recognition, standardization and consistency of education and training of practitioners. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Assessing the feasibility of a clinical trial to evaluate an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care in chronic pain management: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain management is challenging for health systems worldwide. Clinical practice guidelines recommend interprofessional chronic pain management, but chronic pain clinics often have lengthy wait-lists. Advanced practice physiotherapists (APP) in orthopedic clinics and emergency departments have provided effective care and reduced wait times. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a clinical trial to evaluate the effects of integrating an APP into a chronic pain clinic setting. The primary objectives are as follows: (1) determine the feasibility of implementing trial methods by evaluating participant recruitment rates, retention, and assessment completion; (2) determine the feasibility of implementing the APP model of care by monitoring care provided and treatment fidelity; and (3) assess contextual factors that may influence implementation of the APP model of care by exploring the perspectives of patient participants and healthcare providers related to the model of care. METHODS: This will be a single-arm feasibility study with embedded qualitative interviews to assess contextual factors influencing implementation by exploring participant and provider perspectives. Approximately 40 adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain referred for care at an interprofessional chronic pain clinic will be invited to participate in the feasibility study. Approximately 10-12 patient participants and 5-10 health professionals from the interprofessional team will be interviewed using an interpretive description approach. The APP model of care will involve participants seeing a physiotherapist as the first point of contact within the interprofessional team. The APP will complete an initial assessment and make care recommendations. Outcome measures planned for the full trial will be reported descriptively, including pain severity, pain interference, health-related quality of life, psychosocial risk factors for chronic pain, treatment satisfaction, perceived change, healthcare utilization, and healthcare costs over one year. DISCUSSION: This study will inform plans to implement a full-scale study to evaluate the impact of an APP model of care in an interprofessional chronic pain management program. The results of the full study are intended to inform stakeholders considering this model to improve patient-centered and health system outcomes in interprofessional pain management program settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05336903 (Registered April 5, 2022).

Developing a core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need to develop an international competency and capability framework to support standardization of education and roles in advanced practice physiotherapy (APP). This need arose due to the rapid growth of the APP model of care, implemented out of necessity in the absence of agreement as to the competencies and capabilities or formal education required for the roles. This study explores the views and perceptions of practitioners and key stakeholders on a draft competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to: 1) gather feedback from key stakeholders (advanced practice physiotherapists, researchers, and leaders) on a draft competency and capability framework and 2) use that feedback to revise and improve the draft framework. DESIGN: Qualitative study using a series of four multi-national online focus groups. Thematic analysis was conducted according to Braun and Clarke. RESULTS: Sixteen participants from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand participated in the study. Five themes were generated after data analysis: clinical expert, experienced communicator, strong leader, collaborator, and knowledge creator). A modified competency and capability framework was developed based on feedback from the focus groups and input from subject matter experts (SMEs). CONCLUSION: This study provides a modified core competency and capability framework comprising 24 competencies grouped under six domains. This study is a step toward international standardization of advanced practice physiotherapy based on a commonly agreed framework for the education and training of advanced practice physiotherapists.

Evaluating a new referral pathway from physical therapists to rheumatologists: A qualitative study.

Early referral to rheumatology of people with suspected inflammatory arthritis is associated with better outcomes. Typically, these individuals are seen by a family physician who would assess the need for rheumatology referral. However, some may first consult a physical therapist where no physician referral is required. New interprofessional referral pathways, such as direct referral from a physical therapist to a rheumatologist, could enhance early access to a rheumatologist. Our objective was to explore perceptions of clinicians and people with inflammatory arthritis regarding physical therapists referring directly to rheumatologists. We used purposive and snowball sampling to recruit participants for five focus groups: rheumatologists, family physicians, physical therapists, people with inflammatory arthritis, and a mixed group of physical therapists and people with inflammatory arthritis. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: difficulties accessing care, reluctance of family physicians and rheumatologists toward the new pathway, interprofessional relationships (or lack thereof), and opportunities along the referral pathway. The conclusions are that care must be optimized by ensuring swift referral for those who require it; and that there is a need for knowledge translation to all actors on the advantages of this new pathway.

Advanced practice in physiotherapy: a global survey.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice in physiotherapy represents a development in the practice of physiotherapy and has developed in different ways around the world. There is growing evidence to support advanced physiotherapy practice. In May 2019, the member organisations adopted the first World Physiotherapy policy on advanced practice in physiotherapy. However, to date, there is no evidence on the nature and extent of this practice globally. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which advanced practice is present within the global physiotherapy community, to document the titles used, to describe the pathway to become an advanced physiotherapy practitioner and to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the development of the roles. DESIGN: An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the various national associations of the World Physiotherapy. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were the member organisations of World Physiotherapy. INSTRUMENT: The survey comprised 14 questions. The questions were developed based on a review of the evidence around advanced practice and in-depth discussions with the expert group set up by World Physiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 82/112 MOs responded to the survey representing a 73% response rate. Fourteen respondents (14/82, 17%) indicated that they had formal roles in their country/territory. The terms specialist and advanced physiotherapy practitioner were often used interchangeably and were a source of confusion. Seventy-nine (11/14, 79%) percent stated that most advanced physiotherapy practitioners have a combination of clinical practice and a Master's or Doctoral degree. The major facilitators to the development and sustainability of the role were the research evidence, advocacy by the professional organisation, the need to reduce cost and the support received by the advanced physiotherapy practitioners from their employers. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study provide a clearer understanding of how member organisations of World Physiotherapy defined advanced practice in physiotherapy and what titles are used. It provides insights into the barriers and facilitators to the development of advanced practice in physiotherapy.

Advanced Physiotherapy Practice: A qualitative study on the potential challenges and barriers to implementation in Ghana.

Objective: To identify the potential challenges and barriers to the implementation of Advanced Physiotherapy Practice (APP) in Ghana. Methods: A basic interpretive qualitative study design was conducted, with a semi-structured focus group comprising eight physiotherapists and a one-to-one interview with the director of orthopedic surgery in the second largest hospital in Ghana. Participants were sampled purposefully to ensure they had a clear understanding of APP. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded and thematic analysis was performed. Findings: Four key themes were identified as potential challenges to the implementation of APP in Ghana. Theme 1 Jurisdictional Disputes: Physiotherapists believed doctors will not accept the practice, while the doctor interviewed was willing to accept the practice. Theme 2: Management Support: Support from management was identified as a potential barrier to APP implementation due to workplace culture and liability. Theme 3 Change in Law and Policy: APP could be hindered if there is no legislative support and policies in place. Theme 4 Postgraduate Training: This was identified as key to the implementation of APP since there is no such level of training in Ghana. Conclusion: Barriers to health-care programs are often not identified and addressed prior to their implementation in developing countries, leading to program failure. Addressing these four barriers and challenges could ensure the successful implementation of APP in Ghana. APP has the potential to improve access to rural health-care delivery and augment the shortage of health professionals in developing countries.

The relationship between individual-level deprivation and health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between individual-level deprivation and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the general population. METHODS: Data from a population-based survey in the Canadian province of Alberta were used. Individual-level deprivation was assessed using the Canadian Deprivation Index (CDI) and the Ontario Deprivation Index (ODI). HRQL was assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L. Differences in problems in the EQ-5D-5 L dimensions, index and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores across levels of deprivation were examined. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models adjusted for socio-demographic and other characteristics were used to examine the independent association between deprivation and HRQL. RESULTS: Of the 6314 respondents, 39% were aged between 18 and 44 years and 38% between 45 and 64 years; 60% were female. Mean EQ-5D-5 L index and VAS scores were 0.85 (standard deviation [SD] 0.14) and 79.6 (SD 17.7), respectively. Almost one-third (30.6%) of respondents reported no problems on all EQ-5D-5 L dimensions. Few participants reported some problems with mobility (23.8%), self-care (6.2%) and usual activities (25.2%), while 59.3 and 35.5% reported some levels of pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, respectively. Differences between the most and least deprived in reporting problems in EQ-5D-5 L dimensions, index and VAS scores were statistically significant and clinically important. In adjusted regression models for both deprivation indices, the least well-off, compared to the most well-off, had higher likelihood of reporting problems in all EQ-5D-5 L dimensions. Compared to the most well-off, the least well-off had an EQ-5D-5 L index score decrement of 0.18 (p < 0.01) and 0.17 (p < 0.01) for the CDI and ODI, respectively. Similarly, an inverse association was found between the VAS score and the CDI (ß = - 17.3, p < 0.01) as well as the ODI (ß = - 13.3, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Individual-level deprivation is associated with worse HRQL. Poverty reduction strategies should consider the effects of not only neighbourhood-level deprivation, but also that of individual-level deprivation to improve overall health.

Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 are the most commonly used generic measures of health-related quality of life among people with arthritis. However, there is little evidence on the extent to which the individual dimensions and domains of these instruments perform among this population. The objective was to examine the discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 version 2 (and SF-6D) in capturing the burden of arthritis on health-related quality of life in older adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the Alberta Retired Teachers Association survey were used. A known-groups approach, with a-priori hypotheses, was used to examine the discriminative validity of the domain and summary scores of the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 version 2 (and SF-6D). Groups were defined based on self-reported of arthritis, chronic pain level, presence and number of comorbidities, and self-reported health status. RESULTS: Mean age of respondents (N = 2844) was 68.6 (standard deviation [SD] 5.9) years; 54.8% were female, with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 kg/m2 (SD 4.8), and 36.6% reported having arthritis. The overall mean EQ-5D-5 L index score was 0.86 (SD 0.11) and that of SF-6D was 0.79 (SD 0.13). Participants with arthritis had lower EQ-5D-5 L index score (0.83, SD 0.13) and SF-6D index score (0.75, SD 0.13) compared to those without arthritis (0.88, SD 0.09 and 0.81, SD 0.12, respectively). EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D index scores demonstrated moderate discriminative validity with a moderate effect size (0.5). Related dimensions and domains between the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 (e.g., mobility with physical functioning score, pain/discomfort with bodily pain and anxiety/depression with mental health) were moderately to strongly correlated (r = 0.6-0.7). Both instruments could not adequately discriminate between participants with moderate and severe chronic pain of 6-month duration. CONCLUSION: Overall, the EQ-5D-5 L pain/discomfort and mobility dimensions, and the SF-12 bodily pain scale had moderate discriminative ability among older adults with arthritis. However, both instruments had limited discriminative ability for chronic pain. The importance and nature of chronic pain assessment in a given application need to be considered when choosing any of these instruments for measuring health-related quality of life in this patient population.