RESUMO
Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy is increasingly in demand. This study focused on the characteristics of IVIG usage and associated factors toward the frequency status of IVIG among patients in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on patients who received IVIG in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Data were extracted from the request forms for IVIG recorded in the Pharmacy Department from January 2018 until December 2019. Chi-squared test and t-test analysis were used for statistical analysis, and a P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 482 patients received IVIG in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. There were 243 (50.4%) females and 228 (47.3%) males with median age of the patients was 27 years old. The highest indications for IVIG among all patients were hypogammaglobulinemia and other deficiency states in 127 patients (26.3%). The most common indication for one-off treatment in adults was hypogammaglobulinemia and other deficiency states, 35%; whereas in paediatrics, it was Kawasaki disease, 20.3%. The highest indication for regular therapy among adult patients was chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (23.4%), while in paediatrics it was sepsis (31.1%). The clinical category was associated with the frequency status of IVIG usage in both adult and paediatric cohorts with P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the indication of one-off treatment and regular therapy among adult and paediatric patients. A national guideline on the prescription of IVIG for patients is instantly needed to help clinicians in prescribing IVIG appropriately.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical pharmacy plays an integral role in optimizing inpatient care. Nevertheless, prioritising patient care remains a critical challenge for pharmacists in a hectic medical ward. In Malaysia, clinical pharmacy practice has a paucity of standardized tools to prioritise patient care. AIM: Our aim is to develop and validate a pharmaceutical assessment screening tool (PAST) to guide medical ward pharmacists in our local hospitals to effectively prioritise patient care. METHOD: This study involved 2 major phases; (1) development of PAST through literature review and group discussion, (2) validation of PAST using a three-round Delphi survey. Twenty-four experts were invited by email to participate in the Delphi survey. In each round, experts were required to rate the relevance and completeness of PAST criteria and were given chance for open feedback. The 75% consensus benchmark was set and criteria with achieved consensus were retained in PAST. Experts' suggestions were considered and added into PAST for rating. After each round, experts were provided with anonymised feedback and results from the previous round. RESULTS: Three Delphi rounds resulted in the final tool (rearranged as mnemonic 'STORIMAP'). STORIMAP consists of 8 main criteria with 29 subcomponents. Marks are allocated for each criteria in STORIMAP which can be combined to a total of 15 marks. Patient acuity level is determined based on the final score and clerking priority is assigned accordingly. CONCLUSION: STORIMAP potentially serves as a useful tool to guide medical ward pharmacists to prioritise patients effectively, hence establishing acuity-based pharmaceutical care.
Assuntos
Farmácia , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Assistência ao Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Preparações FarmacêuticasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Preprocedural bowel preparation is necessary for optimal colonoscopy visualisation. However, it is challenging to achieve high-quality bowel preparation among patients scheduled for colonoscopy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an intensive patient educational programme on the quality of bowel preparation. DESIGN: An accessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was carried out at the outpatient surgical clinic of a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to the control group (received standard written and verbal instructions) or the experimental group (received an intensive and structured educational programme). All subjects completed a questionnaire before colonoscopy to assess their compliance, acceptability, and tolerability towards bowel preparation regime. Quality of bowel preparation was determined using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). RESULTS: A total of 300 subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited. The experimental group had a significantly higher proportion of good quality bowel preparation than the control group (98.7% vs 52.3%, p<0.001). The median total BBPS score was also significantly higher in the experimental group (8 vs 5, p<0.001). Factors associated with good quality of bowel preparation included educational programme (OR: 22.79, 95% CI: 4.23 to 122.85, p<0.001), compliance to bowel cleansing agent (OR: 24.98, 95% CI 3.12 to 199.71, p<0.001), very difficult acceptability of preparation (OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.38, p<0.001), tolerability towards bowel preparation (OR: 4.98, 95% CI 1.44 to 17.20, p<0.011) and hypomotility drugs (OR: 3.03, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: An intensive patient educational programme can significantly improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
