Effect of Cangrelor on Infarct Size in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated By Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The PITRI Trial).

Background: The administration of intravenous cangrelor at reperfusion achieves faster onset of platelet P2Y12 inhibition than oral ticagrelor and has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct (MI) size in the pre-clinical setting. We hypothesized that the administration of cangrelor at reperfusion will reduce MI size and prevent microvascular obstruction (MVO) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: This was a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial conducted between November 2017 to November 2021 in six cardiac centers in Singapore (NCT03102723). Patients were randomized to receive either cangrelor or placeboinitiated prior to the PPCI procedure on top of oral ticagrelor. The key exclusion criteria included: presenting <6 hours of symptom onset, prior MI and stroke or transient ischemic attack; on concomitant oral anticoagulants; and a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The primary efficacy endpoint was acute MI size by CMR within the first week expressed as percentage of the left ventricle mass ( %LVmass). MVO was identified as areas of dark core of hypoenhancement within areas of late gadolinium enhancement. The primary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined major bleeding in the first 48 hours. Continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test [reported as median (1st quartile- 3rd quartile)] and categorical variables were compared by Fisher's exact test. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 209 recruited patients, 164 patients (78% ) completed the acute CMR scan. There were no significant differences in acute MI size [placebo: 14.9 (7.3 - 22.6) %LVmass versus cangrelor: 16.3 (9.9 - 24.4)%LVmass, P=0.40] or the incidence [placebo: 48% versus cangrelor: 47%, P=0.99] and extent of MVO [placebo:1.63 (0.60 - 4.65)%LVmass versus cangrelor: 1.18 (0.53 - 3.37)%LVmass, P=0.46] between placebo and cangrelor despite a two-fold decrease in platelet reactivity with cangrelor. There were no BARC-defined major bleeding events in either group in the first 48 hours. Conclusions: Cangrelor administered at time of PPCI did not reduce acute MI size or prevent MVO in STEMI patients given oral ticagrelor despite a significant reduction of platelet reactivity during the PCI procedure.

Non-invasive mid-term electrocardiogram patch monitoring is effective in detecting atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cause of serious morbidity such as stroke. Early detection and treatment of AF is important. Current guidelines recommend screening via opportunistic pulse taking or 12­lead electrocardiogram. Mid-term ECG patch monitors increases the sensitivity of AF detection. METHODS: The Singapore Atrial Fibrillation Study is a prospective multi-centre study aiming to study the incidence of AF in patients with no prior AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 1, with the use of a mid-term continuous ECG monitoring device (Spyder ECG). Consecutive patients from both inpatient and outpatient settings were recruited from 3 major hospitals from May 2016 to December 2019. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-five patients were monitored. 6 patients (1.7%) were diagnosed with AF. There were no significant differences in total duration of monitoring between the AF and non-AF group (6.39 ± 3.19 vs 5.42 ± 2.46 days, p = 0.340). Patients with newly detected AF were more likely to have palpitations (50.0% vs 11.8%, p = 0.027). Half of the patients (n = 3, 50.0%) were diagnosed on the first day of monitoring and the rest were diagnosed after 24 h. On univariate analysis, only hyperlipidemia was associated with reduced odds of being diagnosed with AF (OR HR 0.08 CI 0.01-0.74, p = 0.025). In a group of 128 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and had post-operative ECG monitoring, 9 patients (7.0%) were diagnosed with post-operative AF. CONCLUSIONS: The use of non-invasive mid-term patch-based ECG monitoring is an effective modality for AF screening.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in Asian patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

Introduction: Data on heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is still emerging, especially in Asian populations. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Asian HFmrEF patients with those of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: Patients admitted nationally for HF between 2008 and 2014 were included in the study. They were categorised according to ejection fraction (EF). Patients with EF <40%, EF 40%-49% and EF ≥50% were categorised into the following groups: HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively. All patients were followed up till December 2016. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death and/or HF rehospitalisations. Results: A total of 16,493 patients were included in the study - HFrEF, n = 7,341 (44.5%); HFmrEF, n = 2,272 (13.8%); and HFpEF n = 6,880 (41.7%). HFmrEF patients were more likely to be gender neutral, of mid-range age and have concomitant diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, peripheral vascular disease and coronary artery disease (P < 0.001). The two-year overall mortality rates for HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were 32.9%, 31.8% and 29.1%, respectively. HFmrEF patients had a significantly lower overall mortality rate compared to HFrEF patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.95; P < 0.001) and a significantly higher overall mortality rate (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.33; P < 0.001) compared to HFpEF patients. This was similarly seen with cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalisations, with the exception of similar HF hospitalisations between HFmrEF and HFpEF patients. Conclusion: HFmrEF patients account for a significant burden of patients with HF. HFmrEF represents a distinct HF phenotype with high atherosclerotic burden and clinical outcomes saddled in between those of HFrEF and HFpEF. Further therapeutic studies to guide management of this challenging group of patients are warranted.

Impact of aortic annular size and valve type on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Data on patients with small aortic annuli (SAA) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are limited. We aim to describe the impact of aortic annular size, particularly SAA and TAVI valve type on valve haemodynamics, durability and clinical outcomes. METHOD: All patients in National Heart Centre Singapore who underwent transfemoral TAVI for severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis from July 2012 to December 2019 were included. Outcome measures include valve haemodynamics, prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), structural valve degeneration (SVD) and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.22±6.08, with 52.5% patients with small aortic annulus (<23mm), 33.2% patients with medium aortic annulus (23-26mm) and 14.3% patients with large aortic annulus (>26mm). There were more patients with self-expanding valve (SEV) (65.2%) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) (34.8%). There were no significant differences in indexed aortic valve area (iAVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), PPM, SVD or mortality across all aortic annular sizes. However, specific to the SAA group, patients with SEV had larger iAVA (SEV 1.19±0.35cm2/m2 vs BEV 0.88±0.15cm2/m2, P<0.01) and lower MPG (SEV 9.25±4.88 mmHg vs BEV 14.17±4.75 mmHg, P<0.01) at 1 year, without differences in PPM or mortality. Aortic annular size, TAVI valve type and PPM did not predict overall mortality up to 7 years. There was no significant difference in SVD between aortic annular sizes up to 5 years. CONCLUSION: Valve haemodynamics and durability were similar across the different aortic annular sizes. In the SAA group, SEV had better haemodynamics than BEV at 1 year, but no differences in PPM or mortality. There were no significant differences in mortality between aortic annular sizes, TAVI valve types or PPM.

Clinicopathological correlates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest with or without sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a heterogeneous spectrum of underlying etiology but is often a catastrophic event. Despite improvements in pre-hospital response and post-resuscitation care, outcomes remain grim. Thus, we aim to evaluate the predictors of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) and describe autopsy findings of those with the uncertain cause of death (COD). Methods: This is a subgroup analysis of the Singapore cohort from the Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcome Study which studied 933 OHCAs admitted to two Singapore tertiary hospitals from April 2010 to May 2012. Results: Of the patients analysed, 30.2% (n = 282) had an initial return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at the emergency department, 18.0% (n = 168) had sustained ROSC with subsequent admission and 3.4% (n = 32) had survival to discharge. On multivariate analysis, an initial shockable rhythm, a witnessed event, prehospital defibrillation, and shorter time to hospital predicted ROSC as well as survival to discharge. A total of 163 (17.5%) autopsies were performed of which a cardiac etiology of SCD was noted in 92.1% (n = 151). Ischemic heart disease accounted for 54.3% (n = 89) of the autopsy cohort, with acute myocardial infarction (26.9%, n = 44) and myocarditis (3.7%, n = 6) rounding out the top three causes of demise. Conclusion: OHCA remains a clinical presentation that portends a poor prognosis. Of those with uncertain COD, cardiac etiology appears to predominate from autopsy study. Identification of prognostic factors will play an important role in improving individual-level and systemic-level variables to further optimize outcomes.

Initial experience of left bundle branch pacing using the Abbott Agilis HisPro Catheter with stylet-driven leads.

AIMS: Conduction system pacing has gained steady interest over recent years. While the majority of tools and delivery techniques were developed for His bundle pacing (HBP), the feasibility and reproducibility of using these similar tools for left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has yet to be determined. We describe our technique for performing LBBP using the Abbott Agilis HisPro™ Steerable Catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of 22 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years (16 males, 72.7%), underwent LBBP procedure with this catheter between May and October 2021. Nineteen patients (86%) had successful LBBP lead implantation. There were no major complications or mortality. CONCLUSION: The Agilis HisPro™ catheter along with the stylet driven Tendril STS Model 2088TC lead is a safe and feasible delivery system for LBBP.

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There are concerns that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the outcomes of patients with COVID-19. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients who were on ACEIs/ARBs as compared to those not on ACEIs/ARBs. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2020 to identify all studies that evaluated the use of ACEIs/ARBs and reported the in-hospital mortality outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Nine non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The primary outcome studied was the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients who were on ACEIs/ARBs compared with those not on ACEIs/ARBs. RESULTS: Of the 8,313 patients in the nine studies, 7,622 (91.7%) were from studies with all-comers, while 691 (8.3%) were from studies involving only patients with hypertension. 577 (14.6%) in-hospital deaths were observed out of a total of 3,949 patients with an outcome in the nine studies. Overall, no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital mortality between patients on ACEIs/ARBs and those not on ACEIs/ARBs (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.50; p = 0.73). Further sensitivity analysis in the hypertension group and the all-comers group showed similar results (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58-1.32; p = 0.53 and OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.00-3.43; p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: We observed that ACEIs/ARBs had no significant impact on the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients and can be used safely in patients with indications.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a low-volume center using contemporary technology.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is increasingly being performed worldwide for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are concerns of lower success rates and higher complications of AF ablations performed in low-volume centers. Thus, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AF catheter ablation in a low-volume center using contemporary technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: 71 consecutive patients (50 paroxysmal AF [pAF] vs 21 persistent AF) who underwent first catheter ablation were studied. Primary outcome was AF recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural complications, hospitalization for symptomatic tachy-arrhythmias post-ablation and number of repeat ablations. Mean age of our cohort was 59.1 ± 9.7 years, of which 56 (78.9%) were males. 1-year AF recurrence was 19.5% in pAF and 23.8% in persistent AF (p = 0.694). Ablation in persistent AF group required longer procedural (197.76 ± 48.60 min [pAF] vs 238.67 ± 70.50 min [persistent AF], p = 0.006) and ablation duration (35.08 ± 15.84 min [pAF] vs 52.65 ± 28.46 min [persistent AF], p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Major periprocedural complication rate was 2.8%.Subset analysis on (i) cryoablation vs radiofrequency, (ii) Ensite vs CARTO navigational system and (iii) circular vs high density mapping catheter did not yield significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The AF ablation complication and recurrence free rates in both paroxysmal and persistent AF at one year were comparable to high-volume centers. Long-term follow up is needed. In addition, first AF catheter ablation in a low-volume center is realistic with comparable efficacy and safety outcomes to high-volume centers using contemporary ablation technologies.