Development of locally relevant clinical guidelines for procedure-related neonatal analgesic practice in Kenya: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Increasing numbers of neonates are undergoing painful procedures in low-income and middle-income countries, with adequate analgesia seldom used. In collaboration with a multi-disciplinary team in Kenya, we aimed to establish the first evidence-based guidelines for the management of routine procedure-related neonatal pain that consider low-resource hospital settings. METHODS: We did a systematic review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases for studies published from Jan 1, 1953, to March 31, 2019. We included data from randomised controlled trials using heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score, neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) score, neonatal facial coding system score, and douleur aiguë du nouveau-né scale score as pain outcome measures. We excluded studies in which neonates were undergoing circumcision or were intubated, studies from which data were unextractable, or when pain was scored by non-trained individuals. We did a narrative synthesis of all studies, and meta-analysis when data were available from multiple studies comparing the same analgesics and controls and using the same outcome measures. 17 Kenyan health-care professionals formed our clinical guideline development panel, and we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and the panel's knowledge of the local health-care context to guide the guideline development process. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019126620. FINDINGS: Of 2782 studies assessed for eligibility, data from 149 (5%) were analysed, with 80 (3%) of these further contributing to our meta-analysis. We found a high level of certainty for the superiority of breastfeeding over placebo or no intervention (standardised mean differences [SMDs] were -1·40 [95% CI -1·96 to -0·84] in PIPP score and -2·20 [-2·91 to -1·48] in NIPS score), and the superiority of oral sugar solutions over placebo or no intervention (SMDs were -0·38 [-0·61 to -0·16] in heart rate and 0·23 [0·04 to 0·42] in SpO2). We found a moderate level of certainty for the superiority for expressed breastmilk over placebo or no intervention (SMDs were -0·46 [95% CI -0·87 to -0·05] in heart rate and 0·48 [0·20 to 0·75] in SpO2). Therefore, the panel recommended that breastfeeding should be given as first-line analgesic treatment, initiated at least 2 min pre-procedure. Given contextual factors, for neonates who are unable to breastfeed, 1-2 mL of expressed breastmilk should be given as first-line analgesic, or 1-2 mL of oral sugar (≥10% concentration) as second-line analgesic. The panel also recommended parental presence during procedures with adjunctive provision of skin-to-skin care, or non-nutritive sucking when possible. INTERPRETATION: We have generated Kenya's first neonatal analgesic guidelines for routine procedures, which have been adopted by the Kenyan Ministry of Health, and have shown a framework for clinical guideline development that is applicable to other low-income and middle-income health-care settings. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust Research Programme, and the Africa-Oxford Initiative.

The infrared reflex: a potential new method for congenital cataract screening.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of infrared (IR)-reflex assessment using a prototype imaging device to standard non-mydriatic red-reflex screening with direct ophthalmoscope (DO) in the diagnosis of neonatal and childhood cataract. METHODS: The comparison of the techniques was made in two distinct cohorts: in the first, newborns underwent IR and red-reflex testing by a medical student, with results compared to a reference red-reflex examination by an experienced midwife. In the second, an enriched cohort of children attending a specialist paediatric ophthalmology clinic had IR and red-reflex testing by a medical student to reference examination by a paediatric ophthalmologist. The medical students were considered inexperienced screeners due to their limited exposure to ophthalmology. The sensitivity and specificity of the IR and red-reflex assessments in respect to reference examination were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy was compared in Caucasian and non-Caucasian eyes. RESULTS: IR and red-reflex imaging were possible in all 180 neonatal eyes examined. A total of 5% of newborn eyes were found to have embryological remnants in the anterior segment of the eye with IR-reflex imaging which were not detected on reference red-reflex examination. IR-reflex assessment had significantly better sensitivity (100 vs 71%, p < 0.05) and specificity (100 vs 63%, p < 0.01) than red-reflex assessment in the diagnosis of childhood cataract. Red-reflex specificity was particularly poor in non-Caucasian eyes compared to Caucasian eyes (32 vs 72%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicates that IR-reflex imaging has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of eye screening for cataract by inexperienced healthcare staff, particularly in non-Caucasian children.