Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Oral Rehabil ; 44(5): 392-397, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196278

RESUMO

Frameworks made of carbon fibre-reinforced composites (CFRC) seem to be a viable alternative to traditional metal frameworks in implant prosthodontics. CFRC provide stiffness, rigidity and optimal biocompatibility. The aim of the present prospective study was to compare carbon fibre frameworks versus metal frameworks used to rigidly splint implants in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations. Forty-two patients (test group) were rehabilitated with full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations of the upper jaw (total: 170 implants) following the Columbus Bridge Protocol with four to six implants with distal tilted implants. All patients were treated with resin screw-retained full-arch prostheses endowed with carbon fibre frameworks. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range: 18-24). Differences in the absolute change of bone resorption over time between the two implant sides (mesial and distal) were assessed performing a Mann-Whitney U-test. The outcomes were statistically compared with those of patients rehabilitated following the same protocol but using metal frameworks (control group: 34 patients with 163 implants - data reported in Tealdo, Menini, Bevilacqua, Pera, Pesce, Signori, Pera, Int J Prosthodont, 27, 2014, 207). Ten implants failed in the control group (6·1%); none failed in the test group (P = 0·002). A statistically significant difference in the absolute change of bone resorption around the implants was found between the two groups (P = 0·004), with greater mean peri-implant bone resorption in the control group (1 mm) compared to the test group (0·8 mm). Carbon fibre frameworks may be considered as a viable alternative to the metal ones and showed less marginal bone loss around implants and a greater implant survival rate during the observation period.


Assuntos
Carbono , Ligas Dentárias , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/instrumentação , Implantes Dentários , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Retenção de Dentadura/instrumentação , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário/métodos , Perda do Osso Alveolar , Fibra de Carbono , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante/instrumentação , Planejamento de Dentadura , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Maxila/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 45(3): 346-53, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26586300

RESUMO

The aim of this split-mouth, double-blind, randomized study was to determine whether pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) can improve swelling and the management of pain after full-arch immediate loading implant surgery. Eleven patients were selected for the study. Each patient received four distal tilted implants in the upper or lower jaw and underwent full-arch immediate loading rehabilitation. After surgery, two PEMF devices were applied to each patient, one on each cheek. In a random manner, one of these PEMF devices was switched on (test side); the other served as a placebo (control side). Forty-eight hours after surgery clinicians estimated postoperative swelling through photographic documentation, comparing the condition before and after surgery, while pain was assessed using a verbal rating scale. The patient's degree of comfort in relation to the PEMF devices was analyzed by questionnaire using a numerical rating scale. No statistically significant difference was observed between the test and control sides for swelling or pain (P>0.05). Most of the patients did not present swelling or pain at 48h after surgery, regardless of whether the PEMF device was activated or not. Various outcomes were found in the comfort evaluation. Within the limitations of this study, PEMF does not reduce postoperative swelling or pain after implant surgery.


Assuntos
Edema/prevenção & controle , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Arcada Edêntula/reabilitação , Magnetoterapia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 42(9): 663-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25882620

RESUMO

Full-arch immediate loading implant rehabilitations provide patients with compromised dentition an effective treatment to improve their aesthetic and function. Aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the correlation between masticatory ability and gastric emptying rates among these patients. Ten subjects (five men and five women) with compromised dentition were tested in two occasions: before treatment and 30 days after the immediate loading rehabilitation. Masticatory ability was evaluated using the sieves test, and the gastric half emptying time (T(1/2)) was assessed by means of the 13C-octanoic acid breath test. A statistically significant increment (P < 0.005) in masticatory ability was found only in reference to the particles smaller than or equal to 4.75 mm, whereas the gastric emptying rate showed a statistically significant reduction between pre- and post-treatment (P = 0.003). A moderate negative correlation (rho = 0.64, P = 0.048) between the percentage change in masticatory ability and the percentage change in gastric emptying rate was evidenced. Patients with compromised dentition rehabilitated with full-arch immediate implant prostheses present a significant improvement of the gastric process.


Assuntos
Caprilatos/metabolismo , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Esvaziamento Gástrico , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Mastigação , Adulto , Idoso , Testes Respiratórios , Isótopos de Carbono/metabolismo , Implantes Dentários , Planejamento de Dentadura , Feminino , Esvaziamento Gástrico/fisiologia , Humanos , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário/métodos , Masculino , Mastigação/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Dent Res ; 91(9): 821-7, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22851285

RESUMO

Tilted implants have been proposed as an alternative to traditional protocols in the rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of upright and tilted implants supporting full-arch fixed dentures for the immediate rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae, after at least 1 year of function. An electronic search of databases and a hand search of relevant journals in oral implantology were performed according to PRISMA guidelines through August, 2011. The literature search yielded 1,069 articles. Eleven articles were available for analysis. A total of 1,623 implants (778 tilted, 845 upright) were inserted into the maxillae of 324 patients. Seventeen tilted (2.19%) and 16 upright implants (1.89%) failed during the first year. No significant difference in failure rate was found between tilted and upright implants (p value = 0.52). Marginal bone level results were obtained from 6 studies. A non-significant mean difference between tilted and upright implants was found with regard to bone loss. Tilted implants demonstrated a favorable short-term prognosis in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations of the maxillae. Randomized long-term trials are needed to better elucidate long-term success of tilted vs. upright-positioned implants.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Arcada Edêntula/reabilitação , Perda do Osso Alveolar/etiologia , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Maxila
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...