Assessing Clinically Important Differences During Rehabilitation for Stroke: A Pilot Study Evaluating Anchor and Distribution Derived Estimates of Physical Function Change in Classically Summed and Rasch Models of Section GG of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument.

OBJECTIVE: To determine clinically important differences (CIDs) on Section GG physical functioning scores on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) for patients with stroke, using anchor and distribution-based approaches. DESIGN: Pilot prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke (N=208). INTERVENTIONS: Physicians assessed improvements during rehabilitation using the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Improvements (≥1 point) on the mRS were used as the anchor for establishing CIDs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Classically summed and Rasch transformed Section GG change scores associated with clinically important improvements on the mRS. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients (79.8%) improved ≥1 point on the mRS. Change scores of 27, 9, and 16 on Section GG total physical functioning (self-care + mobility), self-care, and mobility/walk scales, respectively, had high sensitivity (0.82-0.85) but low specificity (0.52-0.69) in identifying patients improving on the mRS. Positive predictive values ranged from 0.87 to 0.91, and negative predictive values ranged from 0.42 to 0.52. Total physical functioning and selfcare anchor-derived change scores were similar to the reliable change index (RCI [2.77 × SEM]), calculated as 28 and 10 points, respectively, whereas anchor-derived mobility/walk scale change scores were equivalent to 1.96 × SEM. Exploratory Rasch modeling identified 3 Section GG subscales (R-Self-Care, R-Mobility, and R-Walking). Improvements on the R-Walking subscale were most correlated with mRS improvements (ρ=-0.47); however, accuracy of CID estimates was not improved. CONCLUSIONS: Cut-off scores obtained using the mRS anchor aligned with more robust estimates of change, as estimated by distribution-based measures. While patients achieving anchor-derived cut-offs have a high probability of mRS improvement, change scores may fail to detect clinically meaningful improvements at these same thresholds. Alternative criteria for determining MCID/CIDs, should be explored. Rasch models require further validation.

Predicting Falls in Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Three Instruments Including Hester Davis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Hester Davis Scale (HDS), Section GG, and facility fall risk assessment scores to predict patients who fall during inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: This study was an observational quality improvement project. METHODS: Nurses administered the HDS in parallel to the facility's current fall risk assessment and Section GG of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument. Receiver operating characteristic curves were compared in 1,645 patients. Relationships of individual scale items to falls were also assessed. RESULTS: The HDS (area under the curve [AUC] = .680, 95% CI [.626, .734]), facility fall risk assessment (AUC = .688, 95% CI [.637, .740]), and Section GG scores (AUC = .687, 95% CI [.638, .735]) adequately identified patients who fell. AUCs did not significantly differ between assessments. HDS scores of ≥13, facility scores of ≥14, and Section GG scores of ≤51 resulted in the highest sensitivity/specificity balance. CONCLUSIONS: HDS, facility fall risk assessment, and Section GG scores adequately and similarly identified patients of mixed diagnoses at risk of falling in inpatient rehabilitation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE TO THE PRACTICE OF REHABILITATION NURSING: Rehabilitation nurses have several options including the HDS and Section GG to identify patients at greatest risk of falling.

Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Survivors Requiring Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Two Waves.

OBJECTIVE: Many survivors of severe or critical COVID-19 have required rehabilitation during the pandemic. The primary objective was to compare characteristics and outcomes of survivors of severe or critical COVID-19 admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation facility during the first two waves of the pandemic. Our secondary objective was to identify the factors contributing to functional dependence on admission, discharge, and length of stay. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of 138 patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility in two waves after hospitalization for severe or critical COVID-19 illness between April 1, 2020, and May 3, 2021. RESULTS: Inpatient rehabilitation facility patients in wave 2 had significantly greater functional independence (GG scores) on admission (52; interquartile range, 44-58 vs 41; interquartile range, 28-52), lower incidence of dysphagia and anemia. The patients in both waves experienced similar functional improvement efficiencies with a median GG score change of 3.6 per day and similar discharge GG scores. Neurological sequela (odds ratio, 0.12; P < 0.001) and anemia (odds ratio, 1.35; P < 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of functional independence on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with functional deficits after COVID-19 should be considered for acute inpatient rehabilitation as both patient cohorts benefited from their inpatient rehabilitation facility stays with similar length of stays (11-12 days) and discharge to home rates (88%-90%).