A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Organ Preservation Methods for Deceased Donor Kidneys at High Risk for Delayed Graft Function in Brazil.

The clinical benefit of machine perfusion (MP) was recently assessed in a 1-year Brazilian multicenter prospective randomized trial, that showed that the use of MP was associated with a reduced incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) compared to static cold storage (SCS) in kidney transplant recipients (45% vs 61%). The objective of the present analysis is to consider the cost-effectiveness of MP relative to SCS based on clinical data from this Brazilian cohort. A decision tree model was constructed to simulate a population of 1000 kidney transplant recipients based on data derived from this Brazilian multicenter clinical trial. The model accounts for different health state utilities to estimate the cost-effectiveness of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Brazil comparing 2 kidney preservation methods: MP and SCS. The model accounts for 3 possible graft outcomes at 1 year post-transplantation: success (an immediate functioning kidney), failure (primary nonfunction requiring a return to dialysis), or DGF 1 year post-transplant. MP provided 612 total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.61 QALYs per patient) as compared to SCS (553 total QALYs, 0.55 QALYs per patient). MP was cost effective relative to SCS (US$22,117/QALY, R$70,606/QALY). The use of MP also resulted in more functioning grafts than SCS (821 vs 787), leading to a cost per functioning graft of US$38,033 (R$121,417). In conclusion, this analysis indicates that, despite the initial added cost associated with MP, the use of MP results in more functioning grafts (821 vs 787) and higher patient quality of life relative to SCS in Brazil.

Sexual acquisition of HIV infection after solid organ transplantation: Late presentation and potentially fatal complications.

INTRODUCTION: While the growing knowledge on HIV among solid organ transplant recipients (SOT) is limited to either pretransplant infection or allograft transmission, there are only sparse reports describing HIV-infection after transplantation through sexual route, the primary mode of transmission in the general population. METHODS: From two different centers, we report nine new cases of HIV infection in SOT recipients attributed to sexual acquisition: eight cases of kidney-transplant recipients and one heart-transplant recipient. FINDINGS: There were nine cases of post-transplant HIV-infection detected among 14 526 transplants performed 1998 to 2015. In 6/9 cases, infection was contracted 5 years after SOT. All but one patient had stable allograft function under immunosuppressive therapy. The main trigger to diagnosis was late CMV disease and sexually transmitted diseases; five patients had CDC-stage 3 HIV infection. In 7/9 patients, virologic response and CD4 recovery were achieved within 3 months after starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). After an average of 3.6 years post diagnosis, 5/9 patients remained alive with well-controlled infection and functioning allograft. CONCLUSION: Sexual acquisition of HIV infection after SOT represents a difficult challenge, as it may occur in any kind of transplant and at any time. The course of infection resembles that of the general population, with life-threatening infectious complications, but good response to ART. Assessment of lifestyle and risk behavior is paramount, as indications may be not disclosed without direct questioning.

Renal transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected recipients: a case-control study from the Brazilian experience.

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy has turned human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease into suitable candidates for renal transplantation. We present the Brazilian experience with kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients observed in a multicenter study. METHODS: HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients and matched controls were evaluated for the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), infections, graft function, and survival of patients and renal grafts. RESULTS: Fifty-three HIV-infected recipients and 106 controls were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, but a higher frequency of pre-transplant positivity for hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus infections was found in the HIV group. Immunosuppressive regimens did not differ, but a trend was observed toward lower use of anti-thymocyte globulin in the group of HIV-infected recipients (P = 0.079). The HIV-positive recipient group presented a higher incidence of treated AR (P = 0.036) and DGF (P = 0.044). Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimated that glomerular filtration rate was similar at 6 months (P = 0.374) and at 12 months (P = 0.957). The median number of infections per patient was higher in the HIV-infected group (P = 0.018). The 1-year patient survival (P < 0.001) and graft survival (P = 0.004) were lower, but acceptable, in the group of HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the Brazilian experience, despite somewhat inferior outcomes, kidney transplantation is an adequate therapy for selected HIV-infected recipients.

Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.

This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r-ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end-point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention-to-treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r-ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037-0.29; p < 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.48; p < 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound-healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced-dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301).

Outcomes in obese kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) in obese patients is controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate patient and graft survival and post-transplantation complications between obese and nonobese recipients. METHODS: Patients (n = 3,054) receiving a KT from 1998 to 2008 were divided according to body mass index (BMI) into 3 groups for analysis: group I: BMI <30 kg/m(2) (nonobese); group II: ≥30-34.9 kg/m(2) (class I obese); and group III: ≥35 kg/m(2) (class II and III obese). RESULTS: Mean BMIs were: group I (n = 2,822): 22.6 ± 3.3 kg/m(2); group II (n = 185): 31.9 ± 1.3 kg/m(2); and group III (n = 47): 36.8 ± 1.7 kg/m(2). There were no differences among the 3 groups in patient demographic variables regarding race, sex, or organ source. One-year (I, 98%; II, 98%; III, 95%) and 5-year (I, 90%; II, 92%; III, 89%) patient survival rates were similar among groups. Graft survival rates at 1 year were 96% for groups I and II and 91.5% for group III. Five-year graft survivals were: I, 81%; II, 96%; and III, 79%. The most common cause of graft loss was death, and the main cause of death was infection in all groups. Obese patients were more likely to experience wound dehiscence (I, 1.9%; II, 7.6%; III, 19.1%; P < .001), develop new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT; I, 16.2%; II, 27%; III, 36%; P < .001), and have a prolonged length of hospital stay (I, 11.3 ± 11.4 d; II, 14.5 ± 14.3 d; III, 15.9 ± 16.7 d; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Obese recipients demonstrated outcomes similar to nonobese patients regarding patient and graft survival. However, they had higher rates of prolonged length of hospital stay, wound dehiscence, and NODAT.

Safety profile comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Debate is increasing on whether mycophenolic acid (MPA) provides survival benefits comparable to azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared safety and efficacy of AZA (n = 662) vs. MPA (n = 267) in low-immunologic-risk kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids between 1998 and 2007. Primary outcomes were treatment discontinuation and infection. Secondary endpoints included survival free from biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, and renal function. RESULTS: The 5-year survival free of treatment discontinuation was higher in the MPA compared to the AZA group (74.1% vs. 60.3%, P < 0.001). MPA was discontinued exclusively because of adverse events (16.4%), while AZA was discontinued primarily for lack of efficacy (21.2%). In univariable analysis, MPA was associated with higher incidence of total (561.5 vs. 667.5 episodes/1000 person-year, P < 0.001), bacterial (167 vs. 158 episodes/1000 person-years, P = 0.001), and viral infections (83.2 vs. 100.4 episodes/1000 person-years, P = 0.001), but this association was not confirmed in multivariable analysis. Over 29% of viral infections in the AZA group occurred after conversion to MPA. A high incidence of tuberculosis was observed (2.9 episodes/1000 person-years) with a higher incidence (but not a statistically significant difference) in the AZA group. No significant differences were found in patient survival (90% vs. 89%, P = 0.78) or graft survival (81% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.08), but infection accounted for >50% of all deaths. CONCLUSION: The type of antimetabolite, AZA or MPA, was not independently associated with any safety or efficacy outcome 5 years after transplantation, suggesting that AZA is still a viable option for low-risk KTR receiving TAC and steroids.

Sotrastaurin in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen using everolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Sotrastaurin, a novel selective protein-kinase-C inhibitor, inhibits early T cell activation via a calcineurin-independent pathway. Efficacy and safety of sotrastaurin in a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen were evaluated in this two-stage Phase II study of de novo kidney transplant recipients. Stage 1 randomized 131 patients (2:1) to sotrastaurin 300 mg or cyclosporine A (CsA). Stage 2 randomized 180 patients (1:1:1) to sotrastaurin 300 or 200 mg or CsA. All patients received basiliximab, everolimus (EVR) and prednisone. Primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or lost to follow-up. Main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by MDRD-4 at Month 12. Composite efficacy failure rates at 12 months were higher in sotrastaurin arms (Stage 1: 16.5% and 10.9% for sotrastaurin 300 mg and CsA; Stage 2: 27.2%, 34.5% and 19.4% for sotrastaurin 200 mg, 300 mg and CsA). eGFR was significantly better in sotrastaurin groups versus CsA at most time points, except at 12 months. Gastrointestinal and cardiac adverse events were more frequent with sotrastaurin. Higher treatment discontinuation, deaths and graft losses occurred with sotrastaurin 300 mg. Sotrastaurin combined with EVR showed higher efficacy failure rates and some improvement in renal allograft function compared to a CsA-based therapy.

Lipid profile changes during the first year after kidney transplantation: risk factors and influence of the immunosuppressive drug regimen.

AIM: This study analyzed the incidence, time course, and risk factors associated with dyslipidemia during the first year after kidney transplantation among patients receiving various immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: The analysis included 474 kidney transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) combined with sirolimus (SRL; n=137) or mycophenolate (MMF, n=58) or everolimus (EVR, n=47); or SRL combined with MMF (n=32); or tacrolimus (TAC) combined with SRL (n=86) or MMF (n=114). All patients received prednisone. We evaluated the influence of demographic features, clinical outcomes, and statin use on lipid profiles during the first year after transplantation. total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hdl-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ldl-C), non-HDL-C, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C:HDL-C, TG:HDL-C. RESULTS: Lipid profiles were within the recommended ranges in 28% of patients pretransplantation and in 10% at 1 year; 27% of them received statins. At 1 year, LDL-C<100 mg/dL was observed in 31.8% of patients but more than 35% of these patients still showed other lipid fractions or ratios outside recommended target concentrations. Among all patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL, almost 70% to 80% had other lipid fractions or ratios within target ranges. A logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, time on dialysis, diabetes, type of calcineurin inhibitor (CSA vs TAC), adjunctive therapy (SRL/EVR vs MMF) and prednisone dose to be associated with dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION: Dyslipidemia is frequent at 1 year after transplantation. The lack of agreement among changes observed in lipid fractions and ratios suggests that more studies are necessary to guide therapy besides targeting LDL-C concentrations as recommended by current guidelines.

Surgical approach does not affect perioperative respiratory morbidity in living donor nephrectomy: comparison between anterior subcostal incision and flank incision.

BACKGROUND: Living donor nephrectomy has been a routine surgical procedure that significantly increased the number of organs for patients with end-stage renal disease. Upper abdominal surgeries, especially when performed with an open approach, usually lead to a postoperative reduction in lung volumes and pulmonary compliance, which may predispose to the development of atelectasis and pulmonary mucus retention, important risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infections. AIM: This study sought to compare lung function impairment, pain, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications among live nephrectomy donors undergoing either an open donor nephrectomy through an anterior subcostal incision (SC) or a flank incision (FL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 110 subjects (44 SC/66 FL) had their pulmonary functions (spirometry) and pain (visual analog scale) evaluated preoperatively as well as on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 5. Postoperative pulmonary complications were evaluated daily by a pulmonary physician. A chest radiograph was obtained on postoperative day 2 to evaluate the presence of atelectasis. RESULTS: Both groups were similar before surgery. Patients in both groups showed decreased pulmonary function from day 1 to 3 (P < .05). Subjective pain was increased until day 5 (P < .05) with a higher incidence of atelectasis among 36% FL vs. 25% SC. (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Living donor nephrectomy through either a flank incision or an anterior subcostal incision showed similar degrees of postoperative pain, decreased lung function, and pulmonary complications.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine minimization versus cyclosporine elimination in de novo renal allograft patients receiving sirolimus.

The safety and efficacy of concentration-controlled use of sirolimus (SRL) and cyclosporine (CsA) followed by CsA minimization (CsAm) or elimination (CsAe) beginning at week 13 was compared in a phase 4, open-label, randomized (1:1) trial of renal transplant recipients enrolled between March 2004 and November 2005. The primary endpoint was renal function, measured at 12 months using the Nankivell formula, in patients remaining on therapy. Though a total enrollment of 140 patients in each group was planned to provide an 80% power to detect a difference in means, only 207 subjects were enrolled in this study. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with 98.1% recipients of first grafts, 69.1% from living donors, and 7.2% diabetics. At 12 months, there were no differences in renal function (61.08 vs 65.24 mL/min, P = .132); incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (14.3% vs 22.5%, P = .152); and patient (89.5% vs 92.2%, P = .632), graft (87.6% vs 88.2%, P = .999), and death-censored graft (98.1% vs 94.1%, P = .166) survivals between CsAm and CsAe groups, respectively. There were no differences in the overall rate of study-drug discontinuation (32.4% vs 36.3%, P = .562) but more patients discontinued because of lack of efficacy/graft loss in the CsAe group (4.8% vs 14.7%, P = .018). This study was underpowered to demonstrate the superiority of one regimen over the other. In summary, SRL immunotherapy combined with CsA minimization or elimination showed comparative safety and efficacy. Both regimens offer potential treatment options for de novo renal allograft recipients.

Clinical implications of initial renal function after deceased donor transplant.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether slow graft function (SGF) after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys affected the prevalence of anemia or the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We retrospectively evaluated the records of 534 kidney transplant patients who were classified based on their initial renal function, namely, immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), or delayed graft function (DGF). Among the 534 kidney transplant patients studied, the occurrences of each condition were IGF 104, SGF 133, and DGF 297. Six months after transplantation, a greater percentage of DGF patients were anemic compared with the others (P = .028). However, at 12 months after transplantation, SGF patients showed more anemia than the IGF group. DGF and SGF patients displayed similar GFR values at 18 and 24 months after transplantation. However, IGF patients displayed higher GFRs, even when subjects who experienced acute rejection episodes were censored (P = .004). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was similar among SGF and DGF patients. Patients displaying SGF after deceased-donor transplantation showed a greater tendency to be anemic than those displaying IGF. This study also suggested that SGF patients were at risk for acute rejection episodes and/or significantly reduced kidney function as measured by GFR.

Everolimus plus reduced-exposure CsA versus mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CsA in renal-transplant recipients.

Everolimus allows calcineurin-inhibitor reduction without loss of efficacy and may improve renal-transplant outcomes. In a 24-month, open-label study, 833 de novo renal-transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day (target troughs 3-8 and 6-12 ng/mL, respectively) with reduced-exposure CsA, or mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g/day plus standard-exposure CsA. Patients received basiliximab +/- corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow-up) and the main safety endpoint was renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]) at Month 12 (last-observation-carried-forward analyses). Month 12 efficacy failure rates were noninferior in the everolimus 1.5 mg (25.3%) and 3.0 mg (21.9%) versus MPA (24.2%) groups. Mean eGFR at Month 12 was noninferior in the everolimus groups versus the MPA group (54.6 and 51.3 vs 52.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the everolimus 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg and MPA groups, respectively; 95% confidence intervals for everolimus 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg vs MPA: -1.7, 6.4 and -5.0, 3.2, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. The use of everolimus with progressive reduction in CsA exposure, up to 60% at 1 year, resulted in similar efficacy and renal function compared with standard-exposure CsA plus MPA.

Risk factors associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population. RESULTS: At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1). CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.

FTY720 and everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function: results of an exploratory one-yr multicenter study.

This exploratory, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FTY720, as a part of an immunosuppressive regimen, in combination with everolimus and steroids in de novo renal transplant recipients at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Patients received FTY720 (5 mg) and everolimus (4 mg) 2-12 h pre-transplantation, followed by 2.5 mg/d FTY720 and concentration-controlled everolimus (4-8 ng/mL) post-transplant for 12 months. Induction therapy was prohibited. After enrollment of 56 of the planned 200 patients between 2000 and 2002, the recruitment was terminated. The primary endpoint, rate of graft loss, or death at three months was 15.4% and the biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 42.3%. Death or graft loss at 12 months in the DGF and non-DGF arms was 36.0% and 25.9%, respectively. The mean estimated creatinine clearance at three months was 63 and 55 mL/min in the non-DGF and DGF groups, respectively, while at 12 months it was 56 mL/min in both the groups. Although there was no comparator arm, the results from this exploratory study (compared with data from other phases II and III trials) indicated no apparent benefits of FTY720-based regimens for prevention of acute rejection and preservation of renal function in renal transplant recipients at high risk of DGF.

Exploratory calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in living-related kidney transplant recipients.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is among the major causes of graft loss even in low-risk kidney transplant recipients and correlates with acute nephrotoxic events during the first year post-transplant. Therefore, calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens may improve patient and graft survival among recipients of living-related kidney transplants. To confirm this hypothesis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of two calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in 92 low-risk recipients of one-haplotype living-related kidney transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, azathioprine and prednisone (group I, GI, N = 38), 2 doses of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (GII, N = 33) and 2 doses of daclizumab, MMF, sirolimus and prednisone (GIII, N = 21). At 12 months, treatment failure (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) was higher in GII compared to GIII and GI (54.5 vs 24.0 vs 13.1%, P < 0.01, respectively). In patients of black ethnicity the incidence of acute rejection was 25 vs 83.3 vs 20% (P = 0.055), respectively. Patient and graft survival was comparable. There were no differences in mean creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance at 12 months. Overall incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (3.3%) and cytomegalovirus disease (4.3%) was similar in all groups. Further development of effective calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens should exclude patients of black ethnicity and may need full-induction therapy, perhaps with depleting agents, and concentration-controlled use of sirolimus and MMF.

Worse renal transplant outcomes observed among Afro-Brazilian patients on prospective registry data of 2461 renal transplants at least 1 year follow-up.

We present prospective registry data of 2461 (live donor = 1753 and deceased donor = 08) renal transplants performed between 1999 and 2003. All subjects were followed for more than 1 year after transplantation and most were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor and azathioprine. Afro-Brazilian, white, and mixed patients constituted 11% (272), 67.1% (1651), and 14.9% (367) of the population respectively. Mean dialysis time was 42.3 +/- 32.9 months and delayed graft function, occurred in more than 60%. Three-year patient survival rates were 96.3%, 92.8%, and 86.7% for living-related, living-unrelated, and deceased donors, respectively. Corresponding 3-year graft survival rates were 87.3%, 82.1%, and 71.3% and functional graft survival rates were 90.2%, 88.8%, and 81.5%. The poorer transplant outcome observed among Afro-Brazilian patients has been mainly attributed to differences in absorption of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil.

Thymoglobulin and rate of infectious complications after transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Thymoglobulin is used as an induction agent in kidney transplantation, but the optimal dose is not well established. However, its use may be associated with increased infectious complications after transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective study of 61 high-risk renal recipients of transplants from deceased donors performed between June 2001 and April 2004 included patients treated with thymoglobulin. Patients were divided into two groups according to the total thymoglobulin dose (G1, n = 30, <7 mg/kg; G2, n = 31, >7 mg/kg) and followed for at least 1 year. RESULTS: Mean recipient age was 43 +/- 14 years; 41% were males; 63% non-Whites. Mean cold ischemia time was 26.3 +/- 7 hours. Mean PRA was 23% (0-100%). Second transplantation was performed in 18 (29.5%) patients. Mean donor age was 42.1 +/- 16 years, and 59% had a cerebral vascular accident as the cause of death. Patient- and death-censored graft survival at 12 months were 86% and 88%, respectively. There were 149 infectious episodes among 47 (78%) patients. The incidence of infection was 1.7 +/- 0.24 infections per patient per year in G1 (lower dose) vs 3.12 +/- 0.23 in G2 (P < .001). Bacterial (0.66 +/- 1.0 vs 1.48 +/- 1.26 infections per patient per year, P = .009) and viral infections (0.9 +/- 0.71 vs 1.41 +/- 0.71; P = .006) were more frequent in the higher dose group. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that a greater number of infectious episodes were present when the total dose of thymoglobulin was higher than 7 mg/kg.

Conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil followed by calcineurin inhibitor minimization or elimination in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) followed by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) elimination or minimization in patients with progressive chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). METHODS: Between November 6, 1999 and February 12, 2003, 169 patients receiving CNI/AZA/prednisone (153 CsA; 14 tacrolimus) were included in this study. Demographics, immunosuppression, graft function, hematology, and biochemistry were obtained before (-6, -3, and -1 month) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after and at last follow-up visit after conversion. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 +/- 12 years, 66% males, 51% Caucasian, and 72% living allograft recipients. Mean follow-up times before and after conversion were 32.4 and 19.4 months; 10 patients completed 3 years of follow-up. CNI elimination was performed in 39% and minimization in 61% of patients. Overall there was significantly improved graft function at 1 year after conversion (2.6 +/- 1.0 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mg/dL, P = .038). The slopes of the regression lines of 1/Cr vs time were significantly improved from preconversion to after conversion (-0.026 vs +0.007 mg(-1)/dL per day(-1), P = .001). There was a significant decrease in mean systolic (141 +/- 21 vs 135 +/- 22 mm Hg, P = .015) and diastolic (89 +/- 15 vs 84 +/- 14 mm Hg, P = .005) blood pressure values at 1 year. There were four episodes of acute rejection (Banff IA) treated with steroids. Three years after conversion, patient and graft survivals were 95% and 79%, respectively. One patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. CONCLUSION: Among patients with CAD, conversion from AZA to MMF followed by CNI minimization or elimination was a safe and effective strategy to preserve or improve graft function.

Post-transplant anti-HLA class II antibodies as risk factor for late kidney allograft failure.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the relationship between the post-transplant anti-HLA class I and/or class II panel reactive antibodies and graft failure due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). We studied 512 first kidney recipients transplanted at a single center, with a graft functioning for at least 3 years. A single blood sample was collected from each patient for antibody evaluation. The median posttransplant time after blood collection was 4.4 years and did not differ between patients with (n = 91) or without anti-HLA antibodies (n = 421). Female gender, pregnancies and blood transfusions were associated with the presence of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Graft function deterioration was associated with anti-HLA class II antibodies. Multivariate analysis showed independent association for creatinine levels (RR = 7.5), acute rejection (RR = 2.6), recipient male gender (RR = 3.6) and anti-HLA class II antibodies (RR = 2.9) and CAN-associated graft loss. In conclusion, the presence of anti-HLA class II antibodies conferred a risk for graft loss before a decline in renal function and increased the risk of graft failure in patients who already had a decline in graft function. Thus, anti-HLA class II antibody monitoring is a useful tool for the management of long-term kidney recipients.