Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc ; 18(4): 336-342, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30449962

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare wear of the natural teeth against monolithic zirconia and layered zirconia with different surface finishing procedures such as unpolished unglazed, polished unglazed, and polished glazed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The two-bodied wear test was carried out in a custom-made oral wear simulator with a sample size of 60 zirconia specimen opposing natural teeth. Zirconia specimen was divided into two groups layered and monolithic which further subdivided into unpolished unglazed, polished unglazed, and polished glazed groups (n = 10). The amount of enamel wear occurred for 250,000 cycles when opposed by monolithic and layered zirconia with different surface finishing methods was measured by loss of height of each tooth using three-dimensional scanning and loss of weight using sensitive balance at specified time intervals of 50,000 cycles during masticatory test considering baseline measurement as control. The data were statistically analyzed to compare the enamel wear against layered and monolithic zirconia with different surface finishing protocols by repeated ANOVA test. RESULTS: Monolithic polished unglazed zirconia showed least tooth wear followed by monolithic polished glazed zirconia, monolithic unpolished unglazed zirconia, and layered unpolished unglazed zirconia showed highest tooth wear in terms of both height loss and weight loss (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, monolithic polished unglazed zirconia is wear-friendly to the opposing natural teeth, and polished surfaces in both the groups showed less tooth wear compared to the glazed surface of zirconia specimen.

2.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 10(5): ZC13-6, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27437346

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Retention and esthetics are believed to play a crucial role in deciding the success of removable partial dentures. AIM: To compare retention of acetal resin and cobalt-chromium clasps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model was designed with an edentulous space between mandibular right second premolar and second molar. Occlusal rests were placed on distal fossa of the second premolar and mesial fossa of second molar. An undercut depth of 0.01inch was created on the mesiobuccal surface of the premolar and distobuccal surface of second molar. Three dimensional finite element model of clasp assembly was designed and assigned with the properties of two different materials namely acetal resin and cobalt-chromium in successive steps. A horizontal bar was constructed between the occlusal rests of the prosthesis. Later, variable amount of dislodging force, in increasing order, was applied at the centre of the horizontal bar and the force at which the clasp arm gets dislodged was noted with respect to each of the material. The obtained values were noted and then subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: The amount of force required to dislodge acetal resin and cobalt-chromium clasps was found to be 0.02N and 2N respectively. CONCLUSION: The results obtained suggested that acetal resin clasp exhibited less retentive force than cobalt-chromium clasps.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...