Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Health ; 62(7): 461-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24810834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions and practices of a national sample of college and university presidents regarding their support for concealed handguns being carried on college campuses. PARTICIPANTS: The sample for this study consisted of a national random sample of 900 college or university presidents. METHODS: In the spring of 2013, a 3-wave mailing procedure was used to ensure an adequate response rate to a valid and reliable questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 46%, more than what was needed based on the power analysis. The vast majority (95%) of respondents were not supportive of carrying concealed handguns on campuses. They perceived there to be more disadvantages than advantages to handguns on campus. However, college administrators were not focused enough on the primary prevention of campus firearm trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest a number of activities that could be implemented to enhance safety on college and university campuses.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo/normas , Percepção , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Universidades/normas , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Segurança , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Am Coll Health ; 61(5): 243-53, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23768222

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This multisite study assessed college student's perceptions and practices regarding carrying concealed handguns on campus. PARTICIPANTS: Undergraduate students from 15 public midwestern universities were surveyed (N = 1,800). METHODS: Faculty members distributed the questionnaire to students in general education classes or classes broadly representative of undergraduate students. RESULTS: Useable questionnaires were returned by 1,649 students (92%). The majority (78%) of students was not supportive of concealed handguns on campuses, and 78% claimed that they would not obtain a permit to carry a handgun on campus, if it were legal. Those who perceived more disadvantages to carrying handguns on campus were females, who did not own firearms, did not have a firearm in the home growing up, and were not concerned with becoming a victim of crime. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of students was not supportive of concealed handguns on campus and claimed that they would not feel safer if students and faculty carried concealed handguns.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo/legislação & jurisprudência , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/psicologia , Universidades , Adolescente , Adulto , Crime/prevenção & controle , Crime/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepção , Políticas , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Emerg Med ; 44(5): 1007-16, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23352862

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several professional medical societies advocate for firearm safety counseling with patients. Little is known about Emergency Physicians' practices and perceptions of firearm safety counseling. OBJECTIVE: To assess Emergency Physicians' beliefs regarding firearm control and their confidence in counseling patients on firearm safety. METHODS: A national random sample (n = 500) of the members of the American College of Emergency Physicians was sent a valid and reliable questionnaire on firearm safety counseling. RESULTS: Of the 278 (56.8%) responding physicians, those who were non-white and those who were not members of the National Rifle Association (NRA) perceived firearm violence to be more of a problem than white physicians and those who were members of the NRA. The majority did not believe that patients would view them as a good source of information on firearm safety (63.3%) or that patients would accept them providing anticipatory firearm safety guidance (56.5%). The majority of the Emergency Department physicians did not believe firearm safety counseling would impact firearm-related homicides (75.2%) or suicides (70%). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of Emergency Physicians had never been formally trained regarding firearm safety counseling, did not believe patients would see them as credible sources, and did not believe that anticipatory guidance on firearm safety would have any impact. These data may help inform Emergency Medicine residency programs on the training needs of residents regarding anticipatory guidance on firearm safety.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Armas de Fogo , Papel do Médico , Segurança , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Community Health ; 38(2): 366-73, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089903

RESUMO

The presence of firearms in an environment significantly increases firearm trauma. So far, four states have passed legislation permitting the carrying of concealed handguns on university campuses and several other states are considering such legislation. The purpose of this study to assess the perceptions and practices of college faculty regarding support for carrying concealed handguns on their campuses. A valid and reliable questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 1,125 faculty at 15 randomly selected state universities in five Great Lakes states. A two wave postal mailing in the Spring of 2012 was conducted to help ensure an adequate response rate. A total of 791 (70 %) of the faculty responded. The vast majority felt safe on their campuses (98 %) and were not supportive of people carrying concealed handguns on their campuses (94 %). Seven of the eight potential disadvantages of carrying concealed handguns on campus were supported by the majority of faculty members. Those who were significantly more likely to perceive there to be disadvantages to carrying concealed handguns on campus were: those who did not own a firearm (OR = 4.89), Democrats (OR = 4.52) or Independents (OR = 2.25), Asians (OR = 2.49), and females (OR = 1.51). The vast majority of faculty felt safe on their campuses and perceived that carrying concealed handguns on campuses create more risks than benefits to the campus environment. Aggressive efforts are needed to help maintain the uniquely safe environment of college campuses.


Assuntos
Docentes , Armas de Fogo/legislação & jurisprudência , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Licenciamento , Universidades , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Great Lakes Region , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...