Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 33(6): 603-14, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23505124

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess acute efficacy and safety of 9.75 mg of intramuscular (IM) injections of the atypical antipsychiatric aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and acute agitation. DESIGN: Open-label trial of IM injections of aripiprazole and 24-hour monitoring of clinical response in patients with major psychoses and acute agitation. Partial analysis of blood levels of the administered drug to correlate with clinical response. SETTING: Acute psychiatric care wards in a single university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 201 acutely agitated patients (79 with schizophrenia and 122 with bipolar disorder I). INTERVENTION: Aripiprazole 9.75 mg IM injection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated clinical response using the Excitatory Component of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-EC), the Agitation/Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES), and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Assessments were conducted 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after the first injection for PANSS-EC and ACES, and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours for CGI. Response was at least a 40% decrease in PANSS-EC scores. We measured serum aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole levels in a subsample. IM aripiprazole significantly improved clinical measures. PANSS-EC improved progressively, starting after 30 minutes. ACES improved after 90 minutes and continued thereafter. Effects were sustained, with steadily decreasing CGI scores, until the 24th hour. Response rate was 83.6% after 2 hours, but with repeat injections, it rose to over 90% with no differences among diagnostic groups. Although there were gender differences in the response to individual PANSS-EC items, the responses were similar overall. Neither clinical monitoring nor patient reporting revealed any side effects. No therapeutic window was identified, and levels did not correlate with any clinical measure. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole was effective and safe in reducing acute agitation in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Our results compare favorably to double-blind trials, probably due to higher expectations in trials involving no placebo arm. Absence of side effects could be related to the short observation time.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Agitação Psicomotora/tratamento farmacológico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/sangue , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Agitação Psicomotora/etiologia , Quinolonas/administração & dosagem , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Quinolonas/sangue , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
CNS Drugs ; 26(8): 663-90, 2012 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22784018

RESUMO

Memantine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist approved for Alzheimer's disease with a good safety profile, is increasingly being studied in a variety of non-dementia psychiatric disorders. We aimed to critically review relevant literature on the use of the drug in such disorders. We performed a PubMed search of the effects of memantine in animal models of psychiatric disorders and its effects in human studies of specific psychiatric disorders. The bulk of the data relates to the effects of memantine in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia, although more recent studies have provided data on the use of the drug in bipolar disorder as an add-on. Despite interesting preclinical data, results in major depression are not encouraging. Animal studies investigating the possible usefulness of memantine in schizophrenia are controversial; however, interesting findings were obtained in open studies of schizophrenia, but negative placebo-controlled, double-blind studies cast doubt on their validity. The effects of memantine in anxiety disorders have been poorly investigated, but data indicate that the use of the drug in obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder holds promise, while findings relating to generalized anxiety disorder are rather disappointing. Results in eating disorders, catatonia, impulse control disorders (pathological gambling), substance and alcohol abuse/dependence, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder are inconclusive. In most psychiatric non-Alzheimer's disease conditions, the clinical data fail to support the usefulness of memantine as monotherapy or add-on treatment However, recent preclinical and clinical findings suggest that add-on memantine may show antimanic and mood-stabilizing effects in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/uso terapêutico , Memantina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/farmacologia , Humanos , Memantina/efeitos adversos , Memantina/química , Memantina/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...