Agreement of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the IOLMaster 700 Optical Biometers in Myopic Eyes.

Purpose: To assess the agreement in automated corneal diameter (CD) and anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) distances measurements between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 optical biometers in myopic eyes. Methods: One hundred and sixteen eyes of 116 myopic patients aged between 21 to 60 years were included in this study. Measurements of CD and ACD distances were taken with each biometer for all patients in the same session. A t-test and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant when the measurements were compared. The agreement between biometers was studied by applying a Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean CD values obtained using the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers were 12.26±0.35 mm and 12.13±0.34 mm, respectively. The mean ACD distance values were 3.61±0.29 mm and 3.62±0.31, for the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two devices only for CD measurements (p<0.001), but not for ACD measurements (p=0.26). The limits of agreement obtained were wide in both types of measurements, being 0.422 mm for the CD distance and 0.389 mm for the ACD distance. Conclusion: There were statistically significant differences between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers regarding CD but not in ACD measurements in healthy myopic eyes. These differences could be clinically significant in some cases. According to these results, medical judgement should be used to assess whether the two devices could be used interchangeably for CD and ACD measurements during the clinical practice.

Lens-vault analysis and its correlation with other biometric parameters using swept-source OCT

Purpose: To measure lens vault (LV) and to assess its correlation with various ocular parameters in healthy eyes, using for all measurements the same high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT).Methods: We prospectively recruited 67 Caucasian healthy patients whose mean age was 41.9 ± 12.4 years; only their right eye was included in the study. Data were all recorded with the ANTERION SS-OCT and comprised, for each patient, 5 consecutive measurements of LV, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) distance, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and spur-to-spur (STS) distance.Results: Mean LV was 0.26 ± 0.23 mm (ranging from -0.24 to 0.78 mm). Data analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between LV and ACD (R=-0.80, p < 0.001), AL (R = -0.36, p = 0.002), and ACV (R = -0.68, p < 0.001), and a positive correlation between LV and LT (R = 0.67, p < 0.001), and age (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). In contrast, no statistically significant correlation was found between LV and WTW (R=-0.17, p = 0.15), CCT (R = 0.11, p = 0.36) or STS (R=-0.10, p = 0.41).Conclusions: Taking into account our findings about intra-parameter correlation levels, we believe that LV should be measured and analyzed together with other ocular parameters in clinical routine practice both for diagnosis and for some refractive surgeries. (AU)

Lens-vault analysis and its correlation with other biometric parameters using swept-source OCT.

PURPOSE: To measure lens vault (LV) and to assess its correlation with various ocular parameters in healthy eyes, using for all measurements the same high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 67 Caucasian healthy patients whose mean age was 41.9 ±â€¯12.4 years; only their right eye was included in the study. Data were all recorded with the ANTERION SS-OCT and comprised, for each patient, 5 consecutive measurements of LV, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) distance, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and spur-to-spur (STS) distance. RESULTS: Mean LV was 0.26 ± 0.23 mm (ranging from -0.24 to 0.78 mm). Data analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between LV and ACD (R=-0.80, p < 0.001), AL (R = -0.36, p = 0.002), and ACV (R = -0.68, p < 0.001), and a positive correlation between LV and LT (R = 0.67, p < 0.001), and age (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). In contrast, no statistically significant correlation was found between LV and WTW (R=-0.17, p = 0.15), CCT (R = 0.11, p = 0.36) or STS (R=-0.10, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account our findings about intra-parameter correlation levels, we believe that LV should be measured and analyzed together with other ocular parameters in clinical routine practice both for diagnosis and for some refractive surgeries.

Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between different parameters obtained with 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometers and 1 Scheimpflug camera with partial coherence interferometry (PCI). SETTING: Single center, Oftalvist, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Biometry was performed in 49 eyes using 3 optical biometers: ANTERION SS-OCT, IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, and Pentacam AXL PCI. Keratometry (K), J0 and J45 vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured with each device. Bland-Altman analysis was applied. RESULTS: This study comprises 49 eyes of 49 patients. There were no statistically significant differences for K1, K2, J0 and J45 between the 3 devices (P > .9). In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference in the ACD, CCT, WTW, LT, and AL between the biometers (P < .001). Specifically, there was a statistically significant difference between ACD, CCT, and WTW values for all-pairwise comparisons. IOLMaster showed the shortest ACD value and ANTERION showed the largest ACD. IOLMaster showed the highest CCT and Pentacam showed the lowest CCT. IOLMaster showed the largest WTW and Pentacam showed the shortest WTW. The LT measured with IOLMaster was thicker than that measured with ANTERION. There was a statistically significant difference in the AL between IOLMaster and Pentacam, with a shorter AL measured with IOLMaster (P < .001), but no differences were found between ANTERION and IOLMaster (P = .599) and between ANTERION and Pentacam (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: Mean differences and the limits of agreement obtained in all-pairwise comparisons of the different parameters should be judged clinically to consider the interchangeability of these devices.

Trifocal toric intraocular lenses in eyes with low amount of corneal astigmatism.

AIM: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with low degrees of corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes of 22 patients who underwent implantation a trifocal toric IOL (FineVision PODFT, PhysIOL s.a., Liege, Belgium) were enrolled. Phacoemulsification with femtosecond laser, capsular tension ring insertion and intraoperative aberrometry were performed in all cases. All IOLs used showed a cylinder power of 1.00 D. Main outcome measures were refractive error and corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) values. Eyes were evaluated at 4mo post-surgery. RESULTS: Totally 50% of eyes showed a spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.13 D and all of them within ±0.50 D. The mean SE and refractive cylinder were -0.02±0.23 and -0.16±0.22 D, respectively. Vector analysis revealed that 100% of eyes were within ±0.50 D for the SE and cylindrical components (J0 and J45). Refractive changes were not correlated with keratometric changes (P>0.05) showing that the reduction in astigmatism comes from the trifocal toric IOL. Of 81% and 96% of eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/20, respectively. The postoperative mean values of monocular distance Snellen decimal UDVA and CDVA were 0.97±0.05 and 0.99±0.02 (about 20/20), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the use of this trifocal toric IOL in patients with low amount of astigmatism provides accurate refractive outcomes and enables them to achieve excellent visual acuity.