A Description of Midlife Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence Using Electronic Medical Record Information.

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important health problem affecting women of all ages, but is often not addressed during healthcare visits. PURPOSE: To use electronic records of diagnoses and telephone advice calls to describe the clinical patterns of midlife women experiencing IPV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using case-control methodology, women with an ICD9 diagnosis of IPV were chosen from those enrolled in 2005-2006 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and matched on visit date, age, and facility with women without such a diagnosis. The study population was divided into subsets: ages 45-53 years (318 cases, 1588 controls); ages 54-64 years (200 cases, 1000 controls). Diagnoses and symptoms reported by phone that were significantly related to the cases compared with the controls were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among women aged 45-53 years, diagnoses of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 2.05) and of psychiatric problems (OR = 1.65) and calls for head injury (OR = 3.17), mental health problems (OR = 2.46), and sexually transmitted diseases (OR = 2.40) were associated with IPV. Among women aged 54-64 years, diagnoses of anxiety (OR = 1.74) and other psychiatric problems (OR = 1.76), injuries (other than head and neck) (OR = 1.57), urinary tract infection (UTI; OR = 2.31), headache (OR = 2.06), and calls for mental health problems (OR = 4.16) were associated with IPV. Among all women aged 45-64 years, history of prior IPV was strongly associated with subsequent diagnosis of IPV. CONCLUSIONS: Information available in the electronic health record of women who have been identified as experiencing IPV can be used to identify patterns of symptoms and diagnosis among midlife women. These patterns can potentially be used to improve identification of IPV in this age group. In addition to screening of all women for IPV, the presence of psychiatric problems, injuries, headache, and UTI and prior experience of IPV should prompt additional focused clinical inquiry about IPV in midlife women.

Self-stigma and empowerment in combined-CMHA and consumer-run services: two controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Self-help agencies (SHAs) are consumer-operated service organizations managed as participatory democracies involving members in all management tasks. Hierarchically organized board- and staff-run consumer-operated service programs (BSR-COSPs) are consumer managed, but they afford members less decision-making power. This study considered the relative effectiveness of SHAs and BSR-COSPs working jointly with community mental health agencies (CMHAs) and the role of organizational empowerment in reducing self-stigma. METHODS: Clients seeking CMHA services were assigned in separate randomized controlled trials to a trial of combined SHA and CMHA services versus regular CMHA services (N=505) or to a trial of combined BSR-COSP and CMHA services versus regular CMHA services (N=139). Self-stigma, organizational empowerment, and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline and eight months with the Attitudes Toward Persons With Mental Illness Scale, the Organizationally Mediated Empowerment Scale, and the Self-Efficacy Scale. Outcomes were evaluated with fully recursive path analysis models. RESULTS: SHA-CMHA participants experienced greater positive change in self-stigma than CMHA-only participants, a result attributable to participation in the combined condition (b=1.20, p=.016) and increased organizational empowerment (b=.27, p=.003). BSR-COSP-CMHA participants experienced greater negative change in self-stigma than CMHA-only participants, a result attributable to participation in the combined service (b=-4.73, p=.031). In the SHA-CMHA trial, participants showed positive change in self-efficacy, whereas the change among BSR-COSP-CMHA participants was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Differential organizational empowerment efforts in the SHA and BSR-COSP appeared to account for the differing outcomes. Members experienced reduced self-stigma and increases in self-efficacy when they were engaged in responsible roles.

Are All Consumer-Operated Programs Empowering Self-Help Agencies?

The literature on consumer-operated-service programs (CQSPs) distinguishes two organizational types based on their leadership styles: the self-help agency (SHA)-participant democracy and the board-staff-run COSP. This study considers whether the characteristics of these two organizational leadership styles are recognized by members and whether these characteristics are associated with membership degree of empowerment. Two-hundred and fifty new entrants to five COSP drop-in centers rated the programs' leadership style using the COPES System Maintenance Scale and assessed their own empowerment on four empowerment measures. ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to evaluate differences between settings; MANCOVA to assess differences in member empowerment. COSP system maintenance differences distinguished the two organizational types (p < .000). SHA-participant democracy members scored significantly better than board-staff-run program members on three of the four empowerment measures. SHA-participant democracies, with a lower focus on system maintenance, and an emphasis on power sharing between staff and non-staff members, appeared to more effectively use organizational decision-making processes to empower their members.

Outcomes from consumer-operated and community mental health services: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Hierarchically organized board-and-staff-run consumer-operated service programs (COSPs) are viewed as organizations that promote recovery while working in concert with community mental health agencies (CMHAs). This study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of such combined services for people with serious mental illness. METHODS: A board-and-staff-run consumer-operated drop-in center and colocated CMHA provided the context for the randomized clinical trial. In a weighted sample, 139 new clients seeking help from the CMHA were randomly assigned to agency-only service or to a combination of COSP and CMHA services. Client-members were assessed at baseline and eight months on a measure of symptom severity and on four recovery-focused outcome measures: personal empowerment, self-efficacy, independent social integration, and hopelessness. All scales used have high reliability and well-established validity. Differences in outcome by service condition were evaluated with multivariate analysis of covariance via dummy variable regression. Change scores on the five outcomes were the dependent variables. The covariates for the multivariate analysis included baseline status on each outcome measure and service condition between-group demographic differences. RESULTS: Results indicated that significant changes in three recovery-focused outcomes were associated with service condition across time: social integration (p<.001), personal empowerment (p<.006), and self-efficacy (p<.001). All changes favored the CMHA-only condition. Neither symptomology nor hopelessness differed by service condition across time. CONCLUSIONS: Hierarchically organized board-and-staff-run COSPs combined with CMHA service may be less helpful than CMHA service alone.

A predictive model to help identify intimate partner violence based on diagnoses and phone calls.

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant health problem but goes largely undiagnosed, undisclosed, and clinically undocumented. PURPOSE: To use historical data on diagnoses and telephone advice calls to develop a predictive model that identifies clinical profiles of women at high risk for undisclosed IPV. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in women aged 18-44 years enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) in 2005-2006 using symptoms reported by telephone and clinical diagnosis from electronic medical records. Analysis was conducted in 2007-2010. Overall, 1276 cases were identified using ICD-9 codes for IPV and were matched with 5 controls each. A full multivariate model was developed to identify those with IPV, as well as a reduced model and a summed-score model whose performance characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Predictors most highly associated with IPV were history of remote IPV (OR=7.8); calls or diagnoses for psychiatric problems (OR=2.4); calls for HIV concerns (OR=2.4); and clinical diagnoses of prenatal complications (OR=2.1). Using the summed-score model for a population with IPV prevalence of 7%, and using a threshold score of 3 for predicting IPV with a sensitivity of 75%, 9.7 women would need to be assessed to diagnose one case of IPV. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosed IPV was associated with a clinical profile based on both telephone call data and clinical diagnoses. The simple predictive model can prompt focused clinical inquiry and improve diagnosis of IPV in any clinical setting.

Self-help and community mental health agency outcomes: a recovery-focused randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Self-help agencies (SHAs) are consumer-operated service organizations managed as participatory democracies. Members are involved in all aspects of organizational management, because a premise of SHAs is that organizationally empowered individuals become more empowered in their own lives, which promotes recovery. The study sought to determine the effectiveness of combined SHA and community mental health agency (CMHA) services in assisting recovery for persons with serious mental illness. METHODS: A weighted sample of new clients seeking CMHA services was randomly assigned to regular CMHA services or to combined SHA-CMHA services at five proximally located pairs of SHA drop-in centers and county CMHAs. Member-clients (N=505) were assessed at baseline and at one, three, and eight months on five recovery-focused outcome measures: personal empowerment, self-efficacy, social integration, hope, and psychological functioning. Scales had high levels of reliability and independently established validity. Outcomes were evaluated with a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Overall results indicated that combined SHA-CMHA services were significantly better able to promote recovery of client-members than CMHA services alone. The sample with combined services showed greater improvements in personal empowerment (F=3.99, df=3 and 491, p<.008), self-efficacy (F=11.20, df=3 and 491, p<.001), and independent social integration (F=12.13, df=3 and 491, p<.001). Hopelessness (F=4.36, df=3 and 491, p<.005) and symptoms (F=4.49, df=3 and 491, p<.004) dissipated more quickly and to a greater extent in the combined condition than in the CMHA-only condition. CONCLUSIONS: Member-empowering SHAs run as participatory democracies in combination with CMHA services produced more positive recovery-focused results than CMHA services alone.