Trifluorothymidine resistance is associated with decreased thymidine kinase and equilibrative nucleoside transporter expression or increased secretory phospholipase A2.

Trifluorothymidine (TFT) is part of the novel oral formulation TAS-102, which is currently evaluated in phase II studies. Drug resistance is an important limitation of cancer therapy. The aim of the present study was to induce resistance to TFT in H630 colon cancer cells using two different schedules and to analyze the resistance mechanism. Cells were exposed either continuously or intermittently to TFT, resulting in H630-cTFT and H630-4TFT, respectively. Cells were analyzed for cross-resistance, cell cycle, protein expression, and activity of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidine kinase (TK), thymidylate synthase (TS), equilibrative nucleoside transporter (hENT), gene expression (microarray), and genomic alterations. Both cell lines were cross-resistant to 2'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (>170-fold). Exposure to IC(75)-TFT increased the S/G(2)-M phase of H630 cells, whereas in the resistant variants, no change was observed. The two main target enzymes TS and TP remained unchanged in both TFT-resistant variants. In H630-4TFT cells, TK protein expression and activity were decreased, resulting in less activated TFT and was most likely the mechanism of TFT resistance. In H630-cTFT cells, hENT mRNA expression was decreased 2- to 3-fold, resulting in a 5- to 10-fold decreased TFT-nucleotide accumulation. Surprisingly, microarray-mRNA analysis revealed a strong increase of secretory phospholipase-A2 (sPLA2; 47-fold), which was also found by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR; 211-fold). sPLA2 inhibition reversed TFT resistance partially. H630-cTFT had many chromosomal aberrations, but the exact role of sPLA2 in TFT resistance remains unclear. Altogether, resistance induction to TFT can lead to different mechanisms of resistance, including decreased TK protein expression and enzyme activity, decreased hENT expression, as well as (phospho)lipid metabolism. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(4); 1047-57. (c)2010 AACR.

Differential activation of cell death and autophagy results in an increased cytotoxic potential for trifluorothymidine compared to 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cells.

Trifluorothymidine (TFT) is part of the oral drug formulation TAS-102. Both 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and TFT can inhibit thymidylate synthase and be incorporated into DNA. TFT shows only moderate cross-resistance to 5-FU. Therefore, we examined whether mechanistic differences in cell death could underlie their different modes of action in colorectal cancer cell lines (WiDR, Lovo92 and Colo320). Drug cytotoxicity was determined by SRB- and clonogenic assays, cell death by flow cytometry (PI and annexin V), caspase cleavage by Western blotting and activity assays and in vivo activity in the hollow fiber assay. The IC(50) values of TFT were 1-6 fold lower than for 5-FU, and clonogenic survival was less than 0.9% at 3 muM TFT, while 2-20% of the cells still survived after 20 muM 5-FU. In general, TFT was a more potent inducer of apoptosis than 5-FU, although the contribution of caspases varied between the used cell lines and necrosis-like cell death was detected. Accordingly, both drugs induced caspase (Z-VAD) independent cell death and lysosomal cathepsin B was involved. Activation of autophagy recovery mechanisms was only triggered by 5-FU, but not by TFT as determined by LC3B expression and cleavage. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA in 5-FU exposed cells reduced cell survival. Also, in vivo TFT (as TAS-102) caused more cell death than a 5-FU formulation. We conclude that TFT and 5-FU induce cell death via both caspase-dependent and independent mechanisms. The TFT was more potent than 5-FU, because it induces higher levels of cell death and does not elicit an autophagic survival response in the cancer cell lines. This provides a strong molecular basis for further application of TFT in cancer therapy.

Therapeutic potential of the dual-targeted TAS-102 formulation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Current treatment modalities for cancer combine cytotoxic drugs against DNA and novel targeted drugs affecting signal transduction pathways, which are required for growth progression and metastasizing tumors. Classical chemotherapeutic regimens for gastro-intestinal tumors include antimetabolites based on 5-fluorouracil (5FU), the platinum analog oxaliplatin and the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan. The thymidine analog trifluorothymidine (TFT) has been shown to bypass resistance pathways for 5FU derivatives (S-1, UFT, Xeloda) in model systems, while concurrent application with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI) increases the bioavailability of TFT, thereby potentiating the in vivo efficacy of TFT. The formulation TAS-102 is given orally in a 1.0:0.5 molar ratio (TFT:TPI). The formulation is dual-targeted due to the cytotoxic effect of TFT, which is enhanced by TPI, while TPI also exerts antiangiogenic effects by inhibiting thymidine phosphorylase (TP), also known as platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor. Evidence is accumulating from in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies that these properties favor further combinations with other cytotoxic agents currently being used in the treatment of gastro-intestinal tumors. Also treatment with targeted agents will synergistically down-regulate signal transduction pathways responsible for growth and progression of tumors. In this review, we summarize the available information on (clinical) pharmacology, mechanisms of action, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, early clinical trials and future directions of the new potent combination drug TAS-102.

Irinotecan-induced cytotoxicity to colon cancer cells in vitro is stimulated by pre-incubation with trifluorothymidine.

SN38 is the active metabolite of the anti-cancer agent irinotecan (CPT-11) and is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase-I (topo-I), leading to DNA strand breaks and eventually cell death. The pyrimidine analog trifluorothymidine (TFT) is part of the anti-cancer drug formulation TAS-102, which was developed to enhance the bioavailability of TFT in vivo, and is currently being evaluated as an oral chemotherapeutic agent in phase I clinical studies. In this study, the combined cytotoxic effects of dual-targeted TFT with SN38 were investigated in a panel of human colon cancer cell lines (WiDr, H630, Colo320, SNU-C4, SW1116). We used different drug combination treatment schedules of SN38 with TFT, and possible synergism was evaluated using median drug effect analysis resulting in combination indexes (CI), in which CI<0.9 indicates synergism, CI=0.9-1.1 indicates additivity and CI>1.1 indicates antagonism. Drug target analysis was performed to investigate the effect of TFT on SN38-induced DNA damage, cell cycle delay and apoptosis. Simultaneous exposure to SN38 in combination with TFT was not more than additive, whereas pre-incubation with TFT resulted in synergism with SN38 (CI=0.3-0.6). Only for Colo320 synergism could be induced for both simultaneous and sequential drug combinations. SN38 and TFT induced most DNA damage in H630 and Colo320 cells, which was increased in combination. TFT pre-incubation further enhanced SN38-induced DNA strand breaks in H630 and Colo320 (>20%), which was most pronounced in H630 cells (p<0.01). Exposure to SN38 alone induced a clear cell cycle G2M-phase arrest and pre-incubation with TFT enhanced this effect in WiDr and H630 (p<0.05). Both drugs induced significant apoptosis; SN38-induced apoptosis increased significantly in the presence of TFT (p<0.01), either when added simultaneously (about 3-fold) or at pre-incubation (about 2-fold). Topo-I protein levels varied among the cell lines and TFT hardly affected these. In conclusion, TFT pre-incubation can enhance SN38-induced cytotoxicity to colon cancer cells resulting in synergism between the drugs, thereby increasing DNA damage and apoptosis induction.

Activity and substrate specificity of pyrimidine phosphorylases and their role in fluoropyrimidine sensitivity in colon cancer cell lines.

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and uridine phosphorylase (UP) are often upregulated in solid tumors and catalyze the phosphorolysis of natural (deoxy)nucleosides and a wide variety of fluorinated pyrimidine nucleosides. Because the relative contribution of each of the two enzymes to these reactions is still largely unknown, we investigated the substrate specificity of TP and UP in colon cancer cells for the (fluoro)pyrimidine nucleosides thymidine (TdR), uridine (Urd), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'DFUR), and 5FU. Specific inhibitors of TP (TPI) and UP (BAU) were used to determine the contribution of each enzyme in relation to their cytotoxic effect. The high TP expressing Colo320TP1 cells were most sensitive to 5'DFUR and 5FU, with IC50 values of 1.4 and 0.2 microM, respectively, while SW948 and SW1398 were insensitive to 5'DFUR (IC50>150 microM for 5'DFUR). TPI and BAU only moderately affected sensitivity of Colo320, SW948, and SW1398, whereas TPI significantly increased IC(50) for 5'DFUR (50-fold) and 5FU (11-fold) in Colo320TP1 and BAU that in C26A (9-fold for 5'DFUR; p<0.01). In the epithelial skin cell line HaCaT both inhibitors were able to decrease sensitivity to 5'DFUR and 5FU separately. HaCaT might be a model for 5'DFUR toxicity. In the colon cancer cells 5'DFUR degradation varied from 0.4 to 50 nmol 5FU/h/10(6)cells, that of TdR from 0.3 to 103 nmol thymine/h/10(6)cells, that of Urd from 0.8 to 79 nmol uracil/h/10(6)cells, while conversion of 5FU to FUrd was from 0.3 to 46 nmol/h/10(6)cells. SW948 and SW1398 were about equally sensitive to 5'DFUR and 5FU, but SW1398 had higher phosphorylase activity (>65-fold) compared to SW948. In SW948 and HaCaT TPI and BAU inhibited TdR and Urd phosphorolysis (>80%), respectively. Both TP and UP contributed to the phosphorolysis of 5'DFUR and 5FU. In the presence of both inhibitors, still phosphorolysis of 5FU (>40%) was detected in the tumor and HaCaT cell lines, and remarkably, that of all four substrates in SW1398 cells. 5'DFUR phosphorolysis was also measured in situ, where Colo320TP1, SW1398, and HaCaT cells produced significant amounts 5FU from 5'DFUR (>10 nmol/24h/10(6)cells). In Colo320TP1 and in HaCaT cells TPI completely prevented 5FU production, but not in SW1398 cells, where BAU decreased this by 67% (p<0.01). High uracil and dUrd levels were detected in the medium. Uracil accumulation was heavily reduced in the presence of TPI for Colo320TP1 and HaCaT cells, whereas 5FU-induced dUrd production by these cell lines increased (p<0.01). In contrast, for SW1398 cells only BAU was able to reduce uracil levels, and dUrd production remained unchanged. In conclusion, overlapping substrate specificity was found for TP and UP in the cell lines, in which both enzymes were responsible for converting TdR and Urd, and 5'DFUR. 5'DFUR and 5FU were converted to their products in both the colon cancer cells and keratinocytes.

Low folate conditions may enhance the interaction of trifluorothymidine with antifolates in colon cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Trifluorothymidine (TFT) is a fluoropyrimidine that is part of the novel combination metabolite TAS-102, in which TFT is combined with a potent thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI). TAS-102 is currently tested as an orally chemotherapeutic agent in different schedules in a phase I study. In its monophosphate form, TFT can inhibit thymidylate synthase (TS) activity after binding to the TS-nucleotide binding site leading to dTTP depletion, and in its triphosphate form TFT is incorporated into DNA, eventually leading to DNA damage. In this in vitro study, we investigated whether TFT could potentiate cytotoxicity of the antifolate-based TS inhibitors AG337 (Nolatrexed), ZD1694 (Raltitrexed) and GW1843; and whether increased TS inhibition or DNA damage would be related to this result. METHODS: The drug combinations were studied in colon cancer cell lines either grown at low or high folate conditions. Multiple drug effect analysis was performed after measuring growth inhibition when the drugs were combined (MTT Assay) and expressed as Combination Index (CI), where CI<0.9 indicates synergism, CI=0.9-1.1 indicates additivity and CI>1.1 indicates antagonism. Drug target analysis was performed using the TS in situ inhibition assay and the FADU DNA-damage assay. Cells were exposed to either the drugs alone or in combination to determine the effect on TS activity and DNA damage induction, respectively. RESULTS: Three experimental procedures were used to test the interaction of the drugs: either one of the drugs was kept at a constant concentration (IC25) or two drugs were added in a 1:1 IC50-based molar ratio. The combinations of TFT with one of the antifolates in which one of the drugs was kept at a constant concentration were synergistic for all antifolates in WiDr/F cells, which grow in low folate medium (CI=0.6-0.8), but only additive to antagonistic for the cell lines growing in high folate medium: TFT-AG337: CI=0.9-2.3; TFT-ZD1694: CI=0.9-1.3; TFT-GW1843: CI=0.8-1.7. The procedure in which the two drugs were added in a 1:1 IC50-based molar ratio showed antagonism for all three combinations in all cell lines (CI>2.7). TS inhibition (14.3%) and DNA damage (8%) were more pronounced than expected (P<0.05) when TFT was combined with GW1843 in WiDr/F cells, in contrast to AG337 and ZD1694, which showed inhibiting effects as expected (additive). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TFT with the antifolates AG337, ZD1694 and GW1843 is mainly additive when the drugs are given simultaneously and this is mediated by an additive TS inhibition and DNA damage. The drug interaction may partly be dependent on the folate homeostasis since WiDr/F cells growing at low folate conditions show pronounced synergism in growth inhibition, two-sided TS inhibition and DNA damage, especially when TFT is combined with the tight-binding TS inhibitor GW1843.

Determinants of trifluorothymidine sensitivity and metabolism in colon and lung cancer cells.

Trifluorothymidine (TFT) is a fluorinated thymidine analog that after conversion to its monophosphate derivative can inhibit thymidylate synthase (TS) and be incorporated into DNA. TFT is a good substrate for thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and the combination of TFT and a TP inhibitor (TPI), called TAS-102, has been developed to enhance the bioavailability of TFT in vivo, and is currently being studied in a phase I study. We aimed to determine the limiting factor(s) in the cytotoxicity of TFT with or without TPI to cancer cells. Colon cancer and lung cancer cell lines with either an overexpression or deficiency of one of the enzymes involved in TFT metabolism were used to study the effect of TPI on TFT sensitivity and the role of TS inhibition. The synthesis of radioactive TFT metabolites was studied using thin-layer chromatography together with the incorporation of TFT into DNA. We found that despite a high rate of TFT phosphorolysis, cells with high TP expression are not more resistant to TFT, while TPI did not increase TFT sensitivity. High TS-expressing cells were shown to be cross-resistant to a 72-h exposure to TFT compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), although this was more pronounced at a 4-h exposure (3.4-fold or more for TFT and 1.4-fold or more for 5-FU). Despite a moderate inhibition of TS activity in cells expressing high TS, these cells were more sensitive to TFT than 5-FU (3.8-fold or more). Only in Colo320TP1 cells expressing high TP, inhibition of TFT phosphorolysis by TPI increased formation of active TFT metabolites 1.8-fold, although this was not related to an increase in TFT incorporation into DNA. These studies show that uptake of TFT and subsequent phosphorylation of TFT by cancer cells is very rapid. Despite a high rate of degradation, the activation pathways are still saturated and sufficient to inhibit TS and enable incorporation into DNA, although the contribution of each effect is exposure time dependent.

Induction of resistance to the multitargeted antifolate Pemetrexed (ALIMTA) in WiDr human colon cancer cells is associated with thymidylate synthase overexpression.

Pemetrexed (ALIMTA, MTA) is a novel thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor and has shown activity against colon cancer, mesothelioma and nonsmall-cell lung cancer. We induced resistance to Pemetrexed in the human colon cancer cell line WiDr by using a continuous exposure to stepwise increasing Pemetrexed concentrations (up to 20 microM) as well as a more clinically relevant schedule with intermittent exposure (up to 50 microM) for 4 hr every 7 days, resulting in WiDr variants WiDr-cPEM and WiDr-4PEM, respectively. However, using the same conditions, it was not possible to induce resistance in the WiDr/F cell line, a variant adapted to growth under low folate conditions. Mechanisms of resistance to Pemetrexed were determined at the level of TS, folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) and reduced folate carrier (RFC). WiDr-4PEM and WiDr-cPEM showed cross-resistance to the polyglutamatable TS inhibitor Raltitrexed (6- and 19-fold, respectively) and the nonpolyglutamatable TS-inhibitor Thymitaq (6- and 42-fold, respectively) but not to 5-fluorouracil. The ratios of TS mRNA:beta actin mRNA in WiDr-4PEM and WiDr-cPEM were 5-fold (P=0.01) and 18-fold (P=0.04) higher, respectively, compared to WiDr (ratio: 0.012). In addition, TS protein expression in the resistant WiDr variants was elevated 3-fold compared to WiDr, while the catalytic activity of TS with 1 microM dUMP increased from 30 pmol/hr/10(6) cells in WiDr cells to 2201 and 7663 pmol/hr/10(6) cells in WiDr-4PEM and WiDr-cPEM, respectively. The activity of FPGS was moderately decreased, but not significantly different in all WiDr variants. Finally, no evidence was found that decreased catalytic activity of RFC was responsible for the obtained Pemetrexed resistance. Altogether, these results indicate that resistance to Pemetrexed in the colon cancer cell line WiDr was solely due to upregulation of TS of which all related parameters (mRNA and protein expression and TS activity) were increased, rather than alterations in FPGS or RFC activity.

Involvement of cell cycle control in bleomycin-induced mutagen sensitivity.

Bleomycin-induced chromosomal instability, generally referred to as mutagen sensitivity, is associated with an increased risk for the development of environmentally related cancer including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and lung cancer. On average, the cultured lymphocytes of patients with these types of cancer show an increased number of chromatid breaks per cell after bleomycin exposure in the late S or G2 phase of the cell cycle as compared to lymphocytes from control persons. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether cell cycle regulation is involved in mutagen sensitivity. We determined cell cycle arrest after bleomycin-induced DNA damage in 21 lymphoblastoid cell lines that varied in mutagen sensitivity score. An ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cell line was included for comparison. Using a cut-off point of 0.70 breaks per cell, eight cell lines were classified as insensitive and 13 cell lines showed the hypersensitive phenotype. Compared to insensitive cell lines, bleomycin-treated hypersensitive cells remained at a relatively high level of DNA synthesis, as measured by thymidine incorporation, and showed a decreased accumulation of cells in G2 and M phase, as measured by flow cytometry. AT cells showed an extremely high mutagen sensitivity score, a high level of DNA synthesis, and a strong G2 block. In conclusion, mutagen sensitivity is associated with "damage-resistant growth," which is indicative of impaired cell cycle arrest. By which specific pathway(s) this checkpoint defect is explained has yet to be elucidated; however, it is probably distinct from the checkpoint defect in AT cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 40:79-84, 2002.