Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty.

The primary aim of this clinical and radiostereometric study was to study the migration pattern of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis (SRTMTMC, Avanta®, San Diego, CA). The secondary aims were to assess patient-related outcomes and prosthesis survival 5 years after surgery. Ten patients received the prosthesis. Radiostereometric radiographs were obtained 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years post-operatively and were analysed using model-based software. All patients completed DASH and Nelson Hospital scores at these follow-ups. Mean translations varied between 0.0 and 0.5 mm after 5 years. Rotation values could be calculated in six patients and mean rotations varied between -0.3 and 2.3°, although the precision of rotation values seems to be poor. The 5-year survival rate was 80%. Mean pre-operative DASH and Nelson Hospital scores were 53 (SD 14) and 51 (SD 13), respectively. Six months post-operatively, the DASH and Nelson Hospital scores had both significantly improved to 25 (SD 20) and 74 (SD 18) and remained high after 5 years. Implant stability was good 5 years post-operatively, and early migration did not predict implant failure in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Feasibility of model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis to evaluate early migration of the trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) in total joint arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint of the thumb. METHODS: In five cadaveric hands the TMC-joint was replaced by the Surface Replacement Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (SR™ TMC prosthesis; Avanta, San Diego, CA) and tantalum beads of 0.8 mm were implanted for RSA. RSA radiographs in two directions were made in ten positions to calculate the measurement error. Migration values from zero are indicative for the measurement error. The number of detected markers was recorded. RESULTS: The accuracy analysis showed that for the translations the mean measurement error varied between 0.003 mm (SD 0.057) and 0.055 mm (SD 0.133). For the rotations values ranged from 0.034° (SD 1.759) to 0.502° (SD 1.617). CONCLUSIONS: RSA analysis of the SR™ TMC prosthesis is feasible. The measurement error is good for the translations but high for the rotations. The latter is due to the close position of the markers relative to each other. Level of evidence III.