Plasma protein signatures for high on-treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) displays a poor response to aspirin and/or the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel. This phenomenon is reflected by high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in platelet function assays in vitro and is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate specific plasma protein signatures associated with HTPR to aspirin and clopidogrel in PAD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on targeted plasma proteomics, 184 proteins from two cardiovascular Olink panels were measured in 105 PAD patients. VerifyNow ASPI- and P2Y12-test values were transformed to a continuous variable representing HTPR as a spectrum instead of cut-off level-defined HTPR. Using the Boruta random forest algorithm, the importance of 3 plasma proteins for HTPR in the aspirin, six in clopidogrel and 10 in the pooled group (clopidogrel or aspirin) was confirmed. Network analysis demonstrated clusters with CD84, SLAMF7, IL1RN and THBD for clopidogrel and with F2R, SELPLG, HAVCR1, THBD, PECAM1, TNFRSF10B, MERTK and ADM for the pooled group. F2R, TNFRSF10B and ADM were higher expressed in Fontaine III patients compared to Fontaine II, suggesting their relation with PAD severity. CONCLUSIONS: A plasma protein signature, including eight targets involved in proatherogenic dysfunction of blood cell-vasculature interaction, coagulation and cell death, is associated with HTPR (aspirin and/or clopidogrel) in PAD. This may serve as important systems-based determinants of poor platelet responsiveness to aspirin and/or clopidogrel in PAD and other cardiovascular diseases and may contribute to identify novel treatment strategies.

Inadequate response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are treated with preventive strategies to improve the cardiovascular risk. The incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality however remains high in PAD populations. We therefore aimed to better characterize PAD patients suffering from cardiovascular events and mortality in order to tailor preventive treatment. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, 246 PAD outpatients (17 newly diagnosed, 229 with known PAD) were prospectively enrolled in this observational cohort study. Patient data and blood samples were collected after inclusion, and the primary composite endpoint (myocardial infarction, elective coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, mortality) was evaluated after one year. Secondary outcomes included platelet reactivity, measured using the VerifyNow assay, and medication adherence, assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). Logistic regression models were used to identify associations between characteristics and the occurrence of events. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 207 patients with claudication and 39 with chronic limb threatening ischemia. Twenty-six (10.6%) patients suffered from an event during follow-up. Prior myocardial infarction (OR 3.3 [1.4-7.7]), prior ischemic stroke (OR 4.5 [1.8-10.9]), higher levels of creatinine (OR 5.2 [2.2-12.6]), lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (OR 4.2 [1.5-10.6]) and lower haemoglobin levels (OR 3.1 [1.3-7.1]) were associated with events. Patients with events had more often high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on aspirin (OR 5.9 [1.4-25.1]) or clopidogrel (OR 4.3 [1-19.3]). High adherence to medication was associated with the occurrence of events (OR 4.1 [1-18]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from cardiovascular events and mortality were characterized by prior cardiovascular events as compared to patients who did not experience any events. Antiplatelet therapy was not optimally protective despite high medication adherence, and HTPR was independently associated with the occurrence of events. More research is needed on alternative treatment strategies such as dual antiplatelet therapy or combinations with anticoagulant drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Medical Ethics Committee (METC) of the MUMC+ approved the study (NL63235.068.17) and the study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR7250 ).

Translational insights into mechanisms underlying residual venous obstruction and the role of factor XI, P-selectin and GPVI in recurrent venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Residual venous obstruction (RVO) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is considered a risk factor of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial events and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We hypothesized thrombo-inflammatory markers might be associated with RVO and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a DVT cohort with routine RVO-assessment and 5-year follow-up, patients were invited for blood withdrawal after stopping anticoagulants. Thrombin generation potential, coagulation enzyme:inhibitor complexes, soluble platelet markers and clinical markers were measured in platelet-poor plasma. Associations were represented as odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation. RESULTS: Patients with RVO (102/306, 33 %) had higher rates of PTS (24 vs. 12 %, p = 0.008), but similar rates of recurrence (16 vs. 15 %, p = 0.91) and arterial events (7 vs. 4 %, p = 0.26). RVO was associated with thrombin peak height (OR 1.40 [1.04-1.88]), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, OR 1.35 [1.02-1.79]), and CRP (OR 1.74 [1.10-2.75]). Recurrent VTE was associated with ETP (HR 1.36 [1.03-1.81]), FXIa:C1-inhibitor (HR 1.34 [1.04-1.72]), thrombin:antithrombin (HR 1.36 [1.16-1.59]), soluble P-selectin (HR 2.30 [1.69-3.11]), soluble glycoprotein VI (sGPVI, HR 1.30 [1.01-1.69]), D-dimer (HR 1.56 [1.31-1.86]), and factor VIII (HR 1.44 [1.15-1.82]). Arterial events were associated with sGPVI (HR 1.80 [1.25-2.59]). PTS was not associated with any marker. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate RVO was associated with thrombo-inflammation, but this did not predict clinical outcomes in this setting. Importantly, we found recurrent VTE was associated with ongoing coagulation and platelet activation in patients well beyond the acute phase of DVT. Furthermore, sGPVI indicated an increased risk of arterial events, highlighting the role of platelets in arterial thrombosis following DVT.

Discovery of four plasmatic biomarkers potentially predicting cardiovascular outcome in peripheral artery disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients have an increased cardiovascular risk despite pharmacological treatment strategies. Biomarker research improving risk stratification only focused on known atherothrombotic pathways, but unexplored pathways might play more important roles. To explore the association between a broad cardiovascular biomarker set and cardiovascular risk in PAD. 120 PAD outpatients were enrolled in this observational cohort study. Patients were followed for one year in which the composite endpoint (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, acute limb ischemia and mortality) was assessed. Patient data and blood samples were collected upon inclusion, and citrated platelet-poor plasma was used to analyze 184 biomarkers in Olink Cardiovascular panel II and III using a proximity extension assay. Fifteen patients reached the composite endpoint. These patients had more prior strokes and higher serum creatinine levels. Multivariate analysis revealed increased plasma levels of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), galectin-9 (Gal-9), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A (TNFRSF11A) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) to be most predictive for cardiovascular events and mortality. Positive regulation of acute inflammatory responses and leukocyte chemotaxis were identified as involved biological processes. This study identified IL-6, PAR1, Gal-9, TNFRSF11A as potent predictors for cardiovascular events and mortality in PAD, and potential drug development targets.

Organisation of care for patients using direct oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended by several scientific societies as first-line therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty regarding the organisation of anticoagulation care, with various caregivers being involved. Patients and caregivers are often confronted by uncertainty about the coordination of treatment. With the functional resonance analysis method we visualised the process of anticoagulation care in daily practice in the Maastricht region. This resulted in recommendations on how to improve the organisation of anticoagulation care for DOAC patients.

Predictive value of D-dimer testing for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in unusual locations: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The value of D-dimer testing for the diagnosis of thrombosis in unusual sites is not properly established and evidence is scarce. We performed a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: The search was conducted in MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for papers published in the last 10 years including different presentations of thrombosis in unusual sites. Twenty-three articles were included, from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, comprising 3378 patients with thrombosis in unusual sites (upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, cerebral vein thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Two articles were related to upper extremity thrombosis, showing a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for D-dimer testing. Twelve articles concerned cerebral vein thrombosis, concluding that the timing of D-dimer testing was important, and that patients with a shorter duration of symptoms showed higher D-dimer levels. Sensitivity and specificity in these patients ranged from 58% to 97% and from 77% to 97.5%, respectively. Nine articles were related to splanchnic vein thrombosis. One described a population of patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis, and the rest included patients with portal vein thrombosis. The D-dimer testing methods and the proposed cut-off levels were remarkably different among the included studies. CONCLUSION: D-dimer testing should not be currently recommended for the diagnosis of thrombosis in unusual sites as a first line diagnostic tool. The development of algorithms combining biomarkers such as D-dimer and clinical decision tools could improve the diagnosis.

Clinical and economic impact of compression in the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis.

Essentials The value of compression therapy in acute phase of deep vein thrombosis is still unclear. Patients with deep vein thrombosis received acute compression hosiery, bandaging, or none. Acute compression reduces irreversible skin signs related to post thrombotic syndrome. Compression hosiery may be the preferred choice for the acute phase SUMMARY: Background The effectiveness of compression therapy in the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is not yet determined. Objectives To investigate the impact of compression therapy in the acute phase of DVT on determinants of the Villalta score, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and costs. Patients/Methods Eight hundred and sixty-five patients with proximal DVT (substudy of the IDEAL DVT study) received, immediately after DVT diagnosis, either no compression, multilayer bandaging, or hosiery. In the acute phase and 3 months after diagnosis, HRQOL was determined by use of the EQ-5D, SF6D, and VEINES-QoL intrinsic method (VEINES-QoLint ). At 3 months, signs and symptoms were assessed for the total and separate items of the Villalta score, and healthcare costs were calculated. Results The compression groups had lower overall objective Villalta scores than the no-compression group (1.47 [standard deviation (SD) 1.570] and 1.59 [SD 1.64] versus 2.21 [SD 2.15]). The differences were mainly attributable to irreversible skin signs (induration, hyperpigmentation, and venectasia) and pain on calf compression. Subjective and total Villalta scores were similar across groups. Differences in HRQOL were only observed at 1 month; HRQOL was better for hosiery (EQ-5D 0.86 [SD 0.18]; VEINES-QoLint  0.66 [SD 0.18]) than for multilayer compression bandaging (EQ-5D 0.81 [SD 0.23; VEINES-QoLint  0.62 [SD 0.19]). Mean healthcare costs per patient were €417.08 (€354.10 to €489.30) for bandaging, €114.25 (€92.50 to €198.43) for hosiery, and €105.86 (€34.63 to €199.30) for no compression. Conclusions Initial compression reduces irreversible skin signs, edema, and pain on calf compression. Multilayer bandaging is slightly more effective than hosiery, but has substantially higher costs, without a gain in HRQOL. From a patient and economic perspective, compression hosiery would be preferred when initial compression is applied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IDEAL DVT study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01429714.

Direct oral anticoagulants: When to consider laboratory testing?

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for prevention of thromboembolic stroke, as well as for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Dose adjustment based on laboratory testing is not required; however, there are several potential situations that deserve insight into a DOAC plasma activity level. METHODS: Based on a series of real-life case descriptions, we discuss indications for dedicated DOAC testing, as well as the interpretation and consequences. RESULTS: Testing of DOACs in selected patients may help to better interpret acute situations such as bleeding or thrombosis while on anticoagulation, but also suspected drug failure, drug accumulation, or lack of adherence. CONCLUSION: The 24/7 availability of target-specific tests with adequate calibration is recommended to support the clinician in the interpretation and where needed adjustment of the management of patients on DOACs. The relevance of laboratory-guided DOAC management, particularly in the elderly, merits further study.

Clot structure and fibrinolytic potential in patients with post thrombotic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic sequel of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The clot structure and fibrinolytic potential in PTS is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the fibrinolytic potential and clot structure in patients with PTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a history of DVT were included in a case-control study: patients with PTS (cases n=30) and without PTS (controls n=30), and 30 apparently healthy individuals (HI) without venous thromboembolism (VTE) or venous insufficiency were enrolled. Fibrinolysis and clot structure were assessed by turbidimetric assays, permeation, and confocal microscopy. Fibrinogen was measured by Clauss and fibrinogen γ' by ELISA. RESULTS: We observed a significant trend of decreasing maximum turbidity from HI (median 0.52 [IQR 0.46-0.62]), to controls (0.49 [IQR 0.41-0.55]), to cases (0.46 [IQR 0.39-0.49]) p=0.020. Fibrinogen was lower in patients (cases and controls) (3.69g/L [IQR 3.31-4.26]) compared to HI (4.17 [IQR 3.69-4.65]) p=0.041. Patients with recurrent VTE had lower maximum turbidity and lower permeation than patients with one episode of VTE; (0.31 [IQR 0.25-0.39] versus 0.38 [IQR 0.34-0.44] p=0.008) and (6.0×10(-9)/cm(2) [IQR 5.1-7.9] versus 7.7×10(-9)/cm(2) [IQR 6.0-10.0] p=0.047) respectively, at equal fibrinogen levels. There were no differences in lysis time, confocal microscopy, or fibrinogen γ'. CONCLUSIONS: Lower maximum turbidity, indicating a tendency towards thinner fibres and denser clots, was found in patients with PTS as well as in patients with recurrent VTE. Fibrinogen levels did not explain these differences in clot structure. The abnormal clot structure may contribute to the increased thrombotic risk profile in patients with PTS.

Biomarkers for Prediction of Central Venous Catheter Related-Thrombosis in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: In a prospective setting, we aimed to find associations between biomarkers of the hemostatic system and the occurrence of central venous catheter (CVC)-related thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: The study was conducted between July 2006 and August 2010 at the University Hospital Maastricht, the Netherlands. Consecutive adult patients with hematological malignancies who were going to receive a CVC for intensive chemotherapy were included. The primary end points were (a) symptomatic CVC-related thrombosis and (b) CVC-related infections. Blood samples were taken directly after catheterization, and easy to determine biomarkers (platelet count, leukocyte count, and hemoglobin level) in combination with blood group, factor VIII (FVIII), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), activated protein C (APC) resistance, and free protein S antigen were determined. RESULTS: Blood was collected and analyzed from 168 patients. The incidence of symptomatic CVC-related thrombosis was 9%. In univariate analysis, white blood cell count >10.6 × 109/L, mean FVIII activity, and PAI-1 >12.2 IU/mL were found to be associated with the development of symptomatic CVC-related thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Elevated leukocyte count, high PAI-1, and high FVIII were associated with an increased incidence of symptomatic CVC-related thrombosis. We hope in future that simple, easy to determine laboratory tests that reflect the hemostatic and fibrinolytic activity in combination with clinical parameters may help to identify hematological patients at highest risk of CVC-related thrombosis and help to tailor the management of thromboprophylaxis in hematological patients undergoing CVC placement.

Eliciting patients' preferences for elastic compression stocking therapy after deep vein thrombosis: potential for improving compliance.

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is used to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We aimed to elicit patient preferences regarding ECS therapy after deep vein thrombosis. The most valued attributes were PTS risk reduction and the ability to put on the ECS independently. Heterogeneous results with respect to education level stress the importance of proper counselling. BACKGROUND: Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is used for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Current evidence on its effectiveness is conflicting. Compliance, a major determinant of the effectiveness of ECS therapy, remained largely ignored in former studies. OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into preferences regarding ECS therapy in patients after DVT. PATIENTS/METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted 3 months after DVT in patients enrolled in the IDEAL DVT study, a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 years of ECS therapy with individually tailored duration of ECS therapy for the prevention of PTS. Nine unlabeled, forced-choice sets of two hypothetical types of ECS were presented to each patient. Data were analyzed with multinomial logit models. RESULTS: The respondent sample consisted of 81% (300/369) of invited patients. The most important determinants of preference were PTS risk reduction and putting on the ECS. Patients were willing to increase the duration of therapy by 1 year if this increases the PTS risk reduction with 10%. Patients accepted an increase in the risk of PTS of 29% if they were able to put on the ECS themselves. Preferences were heterogeneous with respect to education level. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of the risk of PTS and the ability to put on the ECS without help are the most important characteristics of ECS therapy. Physicians should pay considerable attention to patient education regarding PTS. In addition, patients should be supported in their ability to put on and take off the ECS independently. These rather simple interventions could improve compliance.

Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach.

BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority trials are performed when the main therapeutic effect of the new therapy is expected to be not unacceptably worse than that of the standard therapy, and the new therapy is expected to have advantages over the standard therapy in costs or other (health) consequences. These advantages however are not included in the classic frequentist approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. In contrast, the decision theory approach of sample size calculation does include these factors. The objective of this study is to compare the conceptual and practical aspects of the frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials, thereby demonstrating that the decision theory approach is more appropriate for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials. METHODS: The frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials are compared and applied to a case of a non-inferiority trial on individually tailored duration of elastic compression stocking therapy compared to two years elastic compression stocking therapy for the prevention of post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: The two approaches differ substantially in conceptual background, analytical approach, and input requirements. The sample size calculated according to the frequentist approach yielded 788 patients, using a power of 80% and a one-sided significance level of 5%. The decision theory approach indicated that the optimal sample size was 500 patients, with a net value of €92 million. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates and explains the differences between the classic frequentist approach and the decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. We argue that the decision theory approach of sample size estimation is most suitable for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials.

Venous in-stent thrombosis treated by ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Stent placement in the venous system is an increasingly used treatment modality in chronic venous obstruction and as additional treatment after thrombolytic therapy in ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Experience in treating in-stent thrombosis with ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis (UACDT) is reported. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated for venous stent occlusion, after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placement for either chronic venous occlusive disease or persistent vein compression in patients with acute DVT was performed. Duration of occlusion and suspected clot age were assessed using patient complaints and typical findings on duplex ultrasonography (DUS). DUS and venography were used to assess patency and to determine the cause of re-occlusion. Acute treatment of occlusion was by UACDT. Additional procedures included PTA, stent placement, and creation of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (median age 43 years; 67% male), treated for occluded stent tracts with UACDT between January 2009 and July 2014, were identified. Indications for initial stenting were treatment of chronic venous obstructive disease (12 patients) and treatment of underlying obstruction after initial thrombolysis in acute DVT (six patients). Technical success was achieved in 11/18 (61%) patients. Primary patency in 8/11 patients was 73% at last follow up (median follow up 14 months [range 0-41 months]). Additional treatments after successful lysis were re-stenting (seven patients) and creation of an AV fistula (six patients). CONCLUSION: Treatment with UACDT of recently occluded stent tracts is feasible and effective. Recanalization of the stent tract can be achieved in most cases. Additional interventions were frequently used after successful UACDT treatment. Suboptimal stent positioning caused the majority of the stent occlusions.

Biomarkers for post thrombotic syndrome: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited knowledge on the etiology of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS), although several mechanisms have been proposed. The objectives are to explore the role of different pathogenic mechanisms for PTS, through measurement of an elaborate panel of biomarkers in patients with and without PTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with PTS (cases) and without PTS after minimal 2years follow-up (controls), were selected from the outpatient clinic of two Dutch hospitals. As a reference to the normal population healthy individuals (HI) without a history of venous thromboembolism were invited to participate. The population consisted of: 26 cases, 27 controls, and 26 HI. A panel of predefined biomarkers was measured in venous blood. RESULTS: D-dimer showed a decreasing trend from cases to controls to HI; p=0.010. Thrombin/antithrombin complex levels were significantly higher in cases than in controls; p=0.032, and HI; p=0.017. APC-ratio was significantly lower in cases compared to controls; p=0.032, and HI; p=0.011. A significant trend of increasing proTAFI from cases, to controls, and HI; p=0.002 was found. There were no differences in inflammatory markers (CRP, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8). Thrombomodulin, tissue-plasminogen activator, and von Willebrand factor were higher in patients compared to HI. There was a significant trend of decreasing sVCAM, from cases, to controls, and HI; p=0.029. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PTS displayed increased coagulation activity, an altered pattern of fibrinolytic marker expression, and increased endothelial activation. We found no evidence of systemic inflammation in patients with PTS at 63months since the last DVT.

Practice of bridging anticoagulation: guideline adherence and risk factors for bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative bridging with low-molecularweight heparins (LMWH) is applied to minimise the risk of thromboembolism (TE). Guidelines characterise patients at risk and strategies to be followed. We assessed guideline adherence in bridging episodes and identified possible risk factors for bleeding in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We searched the electronic patient data system of the Maastricht anticoagulation service, the Netherlands. We identified 181 patients on chronic anticoagulation who underwent surgery (222 procedures) and were bridged with LMWH. Guideline adherence was defined in terms of the relation between TE risk and the dose of LMWH administered, the bleeding risk of the procedure and the duration of postprocedural administration of LMWH. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for bleeding. RESULTS: Of all low TE risk patients (n=102), 84.3% were treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH. The median duration of postprocedural LMWH administration was eight days. The 30-day incidence of major bleeding in the entire group (n=222) was 11.3%. Two patients (0.90%) experienced a deep venous thrombosis. Creatinine clearance ≤40 ml/min (odds ratio (OR) 5.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 20.26) and dental procedures (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.22 to 9.04) were independent predictors for total bleeding. CONCLUSION: Guideline adherence was low, leading to prolonged bridging procedures, excess treatment of patients and high bleeding rates. The majority of patients had a low thromboembolic risk profile or underwent low-risk procedures. For patients with decreased creatinine clearance, reduced doses of LMWH should be considered to reduce bleeding risk.

Exclusion of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells rule in clinically important subgroups: individual patient data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the Wells rule for excluding deep vein thrombosis and whether this accuracy applies to different subgroups of patients. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of individual patient data. DATA SOURCES: Authors of 13 studies (n = 10,002) provided their datasets, and these individual patient data were merged into one dataset. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible if they enrolled consecutive outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, scored all variables of the Wells rule, and performed an appropriate reference standard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multilevel logistic regression models, including an interaction term for each subgroup, were used to estimate differences in predicted probabilities of deep vein thrombosis by the Wells rule. In addition, D-dimer testing was added to assess differences in the ability to exclude deep vein thrombosis using an unlikely score on the Wells rule combined with a negative D-dimer test result. RESULTS: Overall, increasing scores on the Wells rule were associated with an increasing probability of having deep vein thrombosis. Estimated probabilities were almost twofold higher in patients with cancer, in patients with suspected recurrent events, and (to a lesser extent) in males. An unlikely score on the Wells rule (≤ 1) combined with a negative D-dimer test result was associated with an extremely low probability of deep vein thrombosis (1.2%, 95% confidence interval 0.7% to 1.8%). This combination occurred in 29% (95% confidence interval 20% to 40%) of patients. These findings were consistent in subgroups defined by type of D-dimer assay (quantitative or qualitative), sex, and care setting (primary or hospital care). For patients with cancer, the combination of an unlikely score on the Wells rule and a negative D-dimer test result occurred in only 9% of patients and was associated with a 2.2% probability of deep vein thrombosis being present. In patients with suspected recurrent events, only the modified Wells rule (adding one point for the previous event) is safe. CONCLUSION: Combined with a negative D-dimer test result (both quantitative and qualitative), deep vein thrombosis can be excluded in patients with an unlikely score on the Wells rule. This finding is true for both sexes, as well as for patients presenting in primary and hospital care. In patients with cancer, the combination is neither safe nor efficient. For patients with suspected recurrent disease, one extra point should be added to the rule to enable a safe exclusion.

Postintervention duration of anticoagulation in venous surgery.

For a substantial proportion of patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), current treatment strategies are suboptimal and new treatment options are needed. Especially for the group of patients who are at the highest risk for post-thrombotic syndrome, new treatment modalities such as catheter-directed thrombolysis and additional stenting are being investigated. With current clinical studies addressing new technical options, the medical management of patients following these interventions deserves attention. The duration of anticoagulant treatment following surgical or radiological interventions for DVT seems not to be influenced by the presence of a venous stent. According to recent ACCP 2012 guidelines the anticoagulant management in patients who have had any method of thrombus removal performed, the same intensity and duration of anticoagulant therapy as in comparable patients who do not undergo thrombosis removal is recommended (Grade 1B). In the acute phase of thrombosis, irrespective of the technique and whether or not stenting is applied, immediate anticoagulation following the procedure is pertinent to reduce the risk of recurrent thrombosis and thrombus propagation. The long-term treatment duration after venous interventions therefore may be tailored based on common risk factors for recurrent thrombosis and the individual risk for bleeding. Selected thrombophilia factors, d-dimer assessment and residual venous thrombosis provide markers for recurrent DVT. Currently, vitamin K antagonists) provide the main anticoagulants for (prolonged) anticoagulation, while the new oral anticoagulants emerge as promising alternatives. In case prolonged anticoagulation after unprovoked DVT is not indicated, cardiovascular risk management is warranted because of an increased rate of arterial thrombotic events after DVT; aspirin may be indicated as secondary prevention against recurrent thrombosis (while providing primary prevention against arterial thrombosis).

Markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation in relation to post-thrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurs in 20-50% of patients after a deep venous thrombosis (DVT). It is difficult to accurately predict which patients will develop PTS. Biomarkers could be a valuable tool for PTS risk assessment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether increased levels of factor (F)VIII, C-reactive protein (CRP) or D-dimer, over time, are associated with the development of PTS in patients after an acute DVT. METHODS: PTS status was assessed using the Villalta scale. Blood sampling was performed at three points during follow-up. RESULTS: A cohort of 228 consecutive patients was included after an acute DVT. At T1 (12 months after index DVT), both levels of D-dimer (median 725 ng mL(-1) [interquartile range, IQR 400-1400[ vs. 378 ng mL(-1) [251-652] P=0.004) and CRP (median 3.9 mg L(-1) [IQR 1.6-8.5] vs. 2.4 mg L(-1) [1.0-4.3] P=0.018) were increased in patients with PTS, compared with patients without PTS. Factor (F)VIII was not associated with PTS. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, varicosities (odds ratio [OR] 13.4 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-59.1 P=0.001), a previous ipsilateral DVT (OR 6.3 95% CI 1.5-26.9 P=0.012) and CRP>5 mg L(-1) on T1 (OR 8.0 95% CI 2.4-26.4 P=0.001) were significantly associated with PTS. CONCLUSIONS: Besides previous ipsilateral DVT and varicosities, CRP>5 mg L(-1) at T1 was strongly and independently associated with PTS. Persistent inflammation rather than hypercoagulability might be the most important etiological factor in PTS, and may be a target for future therapy. The development of a risk score for PTS, including both clinical risk factors and biomarker levels, such as CRP, might be desirable.

Common alternative diagnoses in general practice when deep venous thrombosis is excluded.

BACKGROUND: In patients initially suspected of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) the diagnosis can be confirmed in approximately 10 to 30% of cases. For the majority of patients this means that eventually an alternative diagnosis is assigned. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency distribution of alternative diagnoses and subsequent management of patients in primary care after initial exclusion of DVT. In addition, assess the value of ultrasound examination for the allocation of alternative diagnoses. METHODS: Data were recorded by general practitioners alongside a diagnostic study in primary care in the Netherlands (AMUSE). Additional data were retrieved from a three-month follow-up questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was performed using these combined data. RESULTS: The most prevalent diagnoses were muscle rupture (18.5%), chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (14.6%), erysipelas/cellulitis (12.6%) and superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) (10.9%). Alternative diagnoses were based mainly on physical examination; ultrasound examination (US) did not improve the diagnostic yield for the allocation of alternative diagnoses. In about 30% of all cases, a wait and see approach was used (27 to 41%). During the three-month follow-up nine patients were diagnosed with venous thromboembolic disease, three of which occurred in patients with the working diagnosis of SVT (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: We found that after exclusion of DVT in general practice a wait and see policy in the primary care setting is uneventful for almost one third of patients, but with the alternative diagnosis of SVT, patients may require closer surveillance since we found a significant association with thrombosis in these patients.