Preconception wellness: differences in health by immigrant status.

Disparities in health between immigrant and non-immigrant pregnant women in the United States is well documented, but few have documented disparities before pregnancy. Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2006), we examined the health of reproductive-aged women (8,095), sorted by immigrant and pregnancy pregnant US-born (P-US), pregnant foreign-born (P-FB), non-pregnant US-born (NP-US), and non-pregnant foreignborn (NP-FB). P-US women were 5.2 times more likely to report illicit drug use than P-FB women. NP-US women were 3.7 times more likely to report illicit drugs use, 45% less likely to have a normal BMI, 2.0 times more likely to binge drink, 7.6 times more likely to smoke, 1.6 times more likely to engage in moderate physical activity, and 1.7 times more likely to use birth control than NP-FB women. The lower prevalence of numerous destructive health behaviors among preconceptional immigrant women is an important finding.

A web-based intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancies in the community.

Despite warnings that drinking during pregnancy is unsafe, many women are still at risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP). This article describes the outcomes of a web-based, self-guided change intervention designed to lower the risk for AEPs in a community. A sample of 458 women, between the ages of 18 and 44 years and at risk for an AEP (i.e., any drinking in the past 30 days and not using reliable contraception), participated in the study. A total of 58% of the women enrolled in the self-guided change intervention were no longer at risk for an AEP at the 4-month follow-up. Sublevel analysis revealed that mail and online versions of the intervention were equally successful at reducing risk for an AEP. This study represents a successful implementation of a web-based, self-guided change intervention to reduce risk for an AEP, an intervention with community-wide reach due to the Internet platform.

Psychiatric disorders among low-income women and unintended pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of both unintended pregnancy and psychiatric disorders in pregnancy is high. Each is associated with compromised birth outcomes and challenges in child-rearing. This study examines the relationship between mental illness and unintended pregnancy in seeking to improve the care provided to women and our ability to minimize the number of children born unwanted or ill-cared for. METHODS: The sample consisted of 744 pregnant Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participants with a stratified enrollment design by residence and representative by race for each WIC county. Analysis consisted of post-stratification by developmental age group with logistic regression models estimating odds of unintended pregnancy among women with and without a psychiatric disorder. Covariates included race, education, and marital status. FINDINGS: Almost one third (30.9%) had at least one psychiatric disorder with over two thirds (67.3%) reporting their pregnancy as unintended. No grouped psychiatric disorder was associated with unintended pregnancy with all ages combined. However, adolescents (ages 15-19) with a substance disorder were less likely to have an unintended pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.7) than women without a substance disorder and emerging adult women (ages 20-23) with an anxiety disorder were less likely to have an unintended pregnancy (aOR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0) compared with those without the targeted disorder. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of unintended pregnancy is not associated with having a psychiatric disorder, although substance use disorders and anxiety disorders were associated with a decreased likelihood for an unintended pregnancy in a specific age group. Importantly, targeted efforts are needed to identify and counsel women with mental illness about pregnancy planning.

Differences between women at higher and lower risk for an unintended pregnancy.

CONTEXT: Little is known about the preconception health status of women that are at risk for an unintended pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that women at high risk for an unintended pregnancy would engage in less healthy behaviors and would have fewer health care encounters than women at lower risk. DESIGN: Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2002 and 2004 datasets), we examined health factors of 18- to 44-year-old, fertile women who were not intending a pregnancy, grouped into high-risk (n=16,113) or low-risk (n=39,426) groups. Women were designated as high risk for an unintended pregnancy based on their non-use of birth control, and women were designated as low-risk for an unintended pregnancy based on their use of birth control. RESULTS: Controlling for variables that mask or exacerbate relationships between risk factors and outcomes was an important component of this study. After controlling for the effects of demographic characteristics, we found that high-risk women remained 1.23 times more likely to be obese (confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.34) and 1.2 times more likely to smoke (CI, 1.11-1.31), both significant findings. We also found high-risk women to be 27% less likely to exercise (CI, 0.67-0.79), 62% less likely to receive a Pap test (CI, 0.31-0.46), 19% less likely to have HIV testing (CI, 0.75-0.87), and 44% less likely to have received sexually transmitted diseases counseling (CI, 0.50-0.63) compared with low-risk women. Interestingly, high-risk women were 27% less likely to use any alcohol (CI, 0.67-0.79) and 11% less likely to binge drink (CI, 0.80-0.99) compared with women at low-risk for an unintended pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of women at risk for an unintended pregnancy are not using any contraceptive method (29%), and these high-risk women also have higher proportions of unhealthy behaviors and significantly lower clinical health encounters than women using any form of birth control (low-risk women).

Exploring health by reproductive status: an epidemiological analysis of preconception health.

BACKGROUND: Recently published preconception health guidelines promote maternal health, yet adherence to those guidelines has not been documented. We hypothesized that pregnant women engaged in a healthier lifestyle than nonpregnant women, although this may vary by pregnancy intention and birth control method. METHODS: We performed secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (2002 and 2004 datasets). The data are collected in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam through a telephone survey of 350,000 adults annually. Subjects were a representative sample of noninstitutionalized, 18-44-year-old, fertile women (n = 66,152). Based on pregnancy risk, women were grouped into one of five categories: pregnant, intending pregnancy (IP), unintended pregnancy high risk (HR), moderate risk (MR), and low risk (LR). Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios (aPOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for behavioral characteristics using pregnant women as the referent group. RESULTS: IP, HR, MR, and LR women were more likely to drink any alcohol (aPOR 10.85, aPOR 8.39, aPOR 11.90, aPOR 11.98, respectively), binge drink (aPOR 7.07, aPOR 6.24, aPOR 7.27, aPOR 7.17, respectively), heavy drink (aPOR 6.90, aPOR 5.67, aPOR 7.48, aPOR 5.89, respectively), and smoke (aPOR 2.89, aPOR 2.69, aPOR 2.40, aPOR 2.09, respectively). Interestingly, IP, HR, MR, and LR women were more likely to engage in leisure activity (aPOR 1.37, aPOR 1.19, aPOR 1.57, aPOR 1.17, respectively). HR, MR, and LR women were less likely to consume folic acid (aPOR 0.14, aPOR 0.21, aPOR 0.29, respectively), whereas women intending a pregnancy were equally likely to consume folic acid (aPOR 0.77 CI 0.30, 2.0), although the response rate for folic acid was low. CONCLUSIONS: Preconceptional health goals are not being met. Pregnancy risk, as delineated by contraceptive use, can inform interventions designed to prevent adversely exposed pregnancies.

Racial disparities in pregnancy-related drinking reduction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the likelihood that women of different racial and ethnic groups would reduce their alcohol consumption during pregnancy. METHODS: Data came from 22 states participating in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 2001 to 2005. After stratifying the sample by preconception drinking level, logistic regressions were used to predict drinking reduction and cessation by the third trimester by race, controlling for age, education, marital status, Medicaid status, pregnancy intention, smoking status, and state. RESULTS: Overall, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic women were all significantly less likely than White women to reduce their heavy drinking after becoming pregnant. American Indian/Alaskan Native women who were moderate drinkers before conception were over 2 times more likely than White women to reduce drinking after becoming pregnant (OR 2.19, CI 0.71, 6.76), although this difference was non-significant (P = .17). Among those who binge drank in the months before pregnancy, compared to White women, Black (OR 0.26, CI 0.17-0.39), Hispanic (OR 0.19, CI 0.12-0.29), American Indian/Alaskan Native (OR 0.44 CI 0.20, 0.96), and Asian/Pacific Islander women (OR 0.11, CI 0.06-0.22) were all less likely to quit binge drinking while pregnant. CONCLUSION: Significant racial differences in pregnancy-related drinking reduction are evident, and may help explain racial disparities in FAS. Results suggest that more targeted efforts are needed to meet the national goals of preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies.

Exploring pregnancy-related changes in alcohol consumption between black and white women.

BACKGROUND: Although epidemiological data indicate that White women are more likely to drink and binge drink before pregnancy, fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is more common in the Black population than among Whites in the United States. Differences in drinking cessation between Black and White women who become pregnant may help explain the disparity in FAS rates. METHODS: The study sample was comprised of 280,126 non-Hispanic Black and White women, ages 18 to 44, from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2001 to 2005 data sets. Predictors of reduction in alcohol consumption (in drinks per month) and binge drinking (>4 drinks on one occasion) by pregnant and non-pregnant women were identified with logistic regression. The effect of interactions of pregnancy status with age, education, and Black or White race on drinks per month and binge occasions were explored using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Pregnant White women averaged 79.5% fewer drinks per month than non-pregnant White women (F = 1250.1, p < 0.001), and 85.4% fewer binge drinking occasions (F = 376, p < 0.001). Pregnant Black women averaged 58.2% fewer drinks per month than non-pregnant Black women (F = 31.8, p < 0.001) and 64.0% fewer binge occasions (F = 13.8, p < 0.001). Compared to Black women, White women appear to make a 38% greater reduction in drinks per month, and a 33% greater reduction in binge occasions. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic White women appear more likely to reduce drinks per month and binge drinking occasions than non-Hispanic Black women during pregnancy. These findings may help explain disparities in FAS in the United States, though this cross-sectional sample does not permit claims of causation. To better describe the impact of differential drinking reduction on FAS rates, future studies of longitudinal data should be done.

Disparities rank high in prioritized research, systems and service delivery needs in Missouri.

OBJECTIVES: An essential function of public health is to conduct research and in Missouri, a research agenda was initiated to promote the health and well being of women and children. In 2005, a survey was emailed to 180 maternal and child health (MCH) researchers throughout the state, with 130 responding for a 72.2% response rate. These individuals were asked to select research priorities out of a list of 130 research agenda items, identify personal areas of expertise, and to recommend new research topics. RESULTS: Results focused on identifying research priorities and research experts. The first, of the five leading research priorities, was researching disparities in terms of age, race, ethnicity, and gender, regarding sexually transmitted diseases, chronic disease, birth outcomes, prenatal care, access to care, childhood exposure to lead, immunizations and vaccinations, mental health, substance abuse, and oral health. The four remaining, of the top five specific research priorities, in order of priority, included (2) reducing barriers to health care access, (3) constructing research ecologically, (4) increasing access to oral health care for children, and (5) reducing the prevalence of children who are at-risk for being overweight. Of the 130 respondents, 83.1% reported at least one area of expertise, with a mean of 7.4 areas of expertise per respondent (range 0-41). Forty percent of the respondents reported health care access as an area of expertise, followed by school health, community development, family support, and pre/post natal care (38.5%, 36.2%, 30.0%, 28.5%, and 26.9%) respectively. Interestingly, only 17.7% of the respondents reported disparities as their area of expertise. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of moving innovations towards changes in practice can only happen when resources are available to assess innovations and communities are ready to implement those innovations. The prioritization of this MCH research agenda, prioritized by a community of MCH researchers with expertise in conducting MCH related research, is the first step towards changes in practice, ultimately leading to improvements in the health of women and children in Missouri.

Managed death in a PACE: pathways in present and advance directives.

OBJECTIVES: To test the effect of an innovative method of documenting present and advance health care wishes on the rates of completion and the qualitative choices of health care wishes. DESIGN: Interventional prospective cohort (pre- and post-). SETTING: Program for All-inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) site in St. Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: Enrolled PACE participants. INTERVENTION: A documentation tool that captures both present and advance directives in a framework of "pathways," blending goals of care with typical procedure-oriented directives. MEASUREMENTS: Data from medical records to calculate rates of health care wishes (HCW) completion, proportions of qualitative choices, and compliance with wishes at death. RESULTS: Baseline prevalences of present directives (PD) and advance directives (AD) were 77% and 36%, respectively, while Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) wishes were documented in 48% of PD and 26% of AD. After implementation of the Pathways Tool, completion rates increased to 99% for both PD and AD. Documented DNR wishes decreased to 38% of PD and increased to 66% of AD. Qualitative choices for care (Longevity vs Function vs Palliation) changed toward a palliation pathway for AD (from 9% to 53%). The rate of dying at home increased from 24% to 65%. Compliance with end-of-life wishes increased from 72% to 96%. These are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a novel pathways method of documenting HCW in a PACE site was associated with increased completion, preferences toward less invasive levels of care at life's end, and increased compliance with participants' wishes and deaths at home. Future research to validate the methodology employed in this intervention should be conducted in other long-term care settings.