Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Do Not Affect Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors affect healing rate, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Primary outcomes included healing and retear rate, determined by radiological imaging. Secondary outcomes included shoulder-specific outcome measures and the visual analog scale (VAS). Risk of bias was graded using the Cochrane risk-of-bias v2.0 tool. The GRADE framework was used to assess certainty of findings. RESULTS: Seven RCTs with a total of 507 patients were included (298 randomized to NSAID/COX-2 vs 209 randomized to control). NSAIDs use did not yield a difference in retear rate (P = .77). NSAIDs were shown to significantly reduce pain in the perioperative period (P = .01); however, no significant difference was present at a minimum of 6 months (P = .11). COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly reduce pain (P = .15). Quantitative analysis of ASES and UCLA scores showed NSAIDs significantly improved functional outcomes versus control (P = .004). COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly improve functional outcomes (P = .15). Two trials were deemed "low" risk of bias, four trials were graded to have "some concerns", and one trial was graded to have "high" risk of bias. Retear rate and functional PROMs were deemed to have "low" certainty. VAS pain scale was graded to have "moderate" certainty. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that NSAIDs do not affect healing rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, but they do significantly improve postoperative pain and functional outcomes. No significant difference was seen in pain or functional outcomes with the use of COX-2 inhibitors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hybrid-Total Ankle Arthroplasty (H-TAA) for Failed Talar Component in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) surgery due to TAA aseptic loosening is increasing. It is possible to exchange the talar component and inlay to another system for isolated talar component loosening in a primary mobile-bearing TAA: Hybrid-Total Ankle Arthroplasty (H-TAA). The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of the revision surgery of an isolated aseptic talar component loosening in a mobile-bearing three-component TAA with a H-TAA solution. METHODS: In this prospective case study, nine patients (six women, three men; mean age 59.8 years; range 41-80 years) with symptomatic isolated aseptic loosening of the talar component of a mobile-bearing TAA were treated with an isolated talar component and inlay substitution. In all nine cases, a hybrid TAA revision surgery was performed by implanting a VANTAGE TAA talar and insert component (Flatcut talar component: six cases, standard talar component: three cases). The patients were reviewed with the pain score (VAS Pain Score 0-10), Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion (DF/PF) Range of Motion (ROM; degrees), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle/Hindfoot Score (0-100 points), Sports Frequency Score (Level 0-4), and subjective Patients' Satisfaction Score (0-10 points). RESULTS: The average Pain score improved significantly from preoperative 6.7 points to postoperative 1.1 points (p < 0.001). Average Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion ROM values increased significantly post-surgery: 21.7° preoperative to 45.6° postoperative (p < 0.001). The postoperative AOFAS scores were significantly greater than the preoperative values: 47.7 points preoperative, 92.3 points postoperative (p < 0.001). The sports activity improved from preoperative to postoperative where, preoperative, none of the patients were able to perform sports. Postoperative, eight patients were able to be sports-active again. The overall average postoperative level of sports activity was 1.4. The postoperative average patient's satisfaction was 9.3 points. CONCLUSIONS: In painful talar component aseptic loosening of a three-component mobile-bearing TAA, H-TAA is a good surgical solution for reducing pain, restoring ankle function, and improving patients' life quality.

Validation of three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle.

PURPOSE: A number of classification systems exist for posterior malleolar ankle fractures. The user reliability of these classification systems remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of three commonly utilised classification systems for fractures of the posterior malleolus. METHODS: Imaging of 60 patients across 2 hospitals with ankle fractures including a posterior malleolar fragment was identified. All patients had undergone plain radiographs and computed tomography of their injured ankle as part of their normal standard of care. 9 surgeons including pre-resident/registrar level, resident/registrar level, and attending/consultant level applied the Haraguchi, Bartonícek, and Mason classifications to these fractures, at two timepoints, at least 4 weeks apart. The order was randomised between assessments. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' κ and standard error (SE). Intra-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's κ and standard error (SE). RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' κ) was calculated for the Haraguchi classification as 0.588 (SE 0.023), for the Bartonícek classification as 0.626 (SE 0.019), and the Mason classification as 0.541 (SE 0.098). Intra-rater reliability (Cohen's κ) was 0.761 (SE 0.098) for the Haraguchi classification, 0.761 (SE 0.091) for the Bartonícek, classification, and 0.724 (SE 0.096) for the Mason classification. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures. Based on definitions by Landis and Koch (Biometrics 33:159-174, 1977), inter-rater reliability was rated as 'moderate' for the Haraguchi and Mason classifications and 'substantial' for the Bartonícek classification. Similarly, the intra-rater reliability was rated as 'substantial' for all three classifications.

Clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis for long head of biceps pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The comparative clinical effectiveness of common surgical techniques to address long head of biceps (LHB) pathology is unclear. We synthesised the evidence to compare the clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library of randomised controlled trials were searched through 31 October 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials, reporting patient reported outcome measures, comparing LHB tenotomy with tenodesis for LHB pathology, with or without concomitant rotator cuff pathology. Studies including patients treated for superior labral anterior-posterior tears were excluded. No language limits were employed. All publications from database inception to 31 October 2021 were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening was performed by two authors independently. A third author reviewed the article, where consensus for inclusion was required. Data were extracted by two authors. Data were synthesised using RevMan. Inverse variance statistics and a random effects model were used. RESULTS: 860 patients from 11 RCTs (426 tenotomy vs 434 tenodesis) were included. Pooled analysis of patient-reported functional outcome measures data demonstrated comparable outcomes (n=10 studies; 403 tenotomy vs 416 tenodesis; standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.14, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.32, p=0.13). There was no significant difference for pain (Visual Analogue Scale) (n=8 studies; 345 tenotomy vs 350 tenodesis; MD: -0.11, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.06, p=0.21). Tenodesis resulted in a lower rate of Popeye deformity (n=10 studies; 401 tenotomy vs 410 tenodesis; OR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45, p<0.00001). Tenotomy demonstrated shorter operative time (n=4 studies; 204 tenotomy vs 201 tenodesis; MD 15.2, 95% CI 1.06 to 29.36, p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Aside from a lower rate of cosmetic deformity, tenodesis yielded no significant clinical benefit to tenotomy for addressing LHB pathology. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198658.

Joint-Preserving Surgery in Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis.

Ankle deformity is a disabling condition especially if concomitant with osteoarthritis (OA). Varus ankle OA is one of the most common ankle OA deformities. This deformity usually leads to unequal load distribution in the ankle joint and decreases joint contact surface area, leading to a progressive degenerative arthritic situation. Varus ankle OA might have multiple causative factors, which might present as a single isolated factor or encompassed together in a single patient. The etiologies can be classified as post-traumatic (e.g., after fractures and lateral ligament instability), degenerative, systemic, neuromuscular, congenital, and others. Treatment options are determined by the degree of the deformity and analyzing the pathology, which range from the conservative treatments up to surgical interventions. Surgical treatment of the varus ankle OA can be classified into two categories, joint-preserving surgery (JPS) and joint-sacrificing surgery (JSS) as total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. JPS is a valuable treatment option in varus ankle OA, which should not be neglected since it has showed a promising result, optimizing biomechanics and improving the survivorship of the ankle joint.

Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is a common injury to the shoulder. Various surgical reconstruction methods exist when operative management is required, but the optimal procedure is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature to assess the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation. Methods: The study protocol was designed and registered prospectively on PROSPERO (International prospective register for systematic reviews). Literature search will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library electronic databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical procedures for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation will be included. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder. Secondary outcomes may include radiological measurements, objective measurements of strength testing, range of motion, other patient-reported outcome measures not specific to the shoulder such as the Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, timelines for return to sport or work, and rate of complications. Risk of bias will be assessed within each study using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Jadad score. Inconsistency and bias across included studies will be assessed statistically. Comparable outcome data will be pooled and analysed quantitatively or qualitatively as appropriate. Ethics and dissemination: This study did not require ethical clearance. We plan to publish this systematic review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal and present the results at various national and international conferences. Highlights: There is currently variation in surgical synthetic ligament reconstruction techniques for acute acromioclavicular separation, with no clear consensus established.This systematic review evaluates the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation.Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder.

The ability to wear heeled footwear following first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Fusion remains the gold standard treatment for symptomatic first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthritis. Surgeons have traditionally advised female patients during the consenting process that they would have limitations or be unable to wear heeled footwear following first MTPJ fusion due to the loss of dorsiflexion at the first MTPJ. Anecdotally, surgeons have found that some patients were still able to continue wearing heeled footwear post fusion surgery. Heeled footwear has long been a trendy fashion accessory dating back from ancient Egyptian times and are regularly worn by a significant proportion of women today. Given the lack of literature in this matter, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of first MTPJ fusion surgery on the ability to wear heeled footwear, to aid in the consenting process. METHODS: A retrospective review of 50 female patients who have had an isolated first MTPJ fusion between 2004 and 2015 at the authors' institution was undertaken with a follow-up telephone survey which included questions on ability to wear heeled footwear pre and post-operatively, duration, and the height of heels they could wear. RESULTS: This study included 50 patients (62 feet) with a mean age of 63 years (range 43-78 years) at the time of surgery, with a mean follow-up of eight years (range 5-16years) from surgery. Of the 42 patients who wore heeled footwear pre-surgery, 26 (62%) continued wearing them. The majority of them (n = 23, 88%) were able to wear the same height heels. Patients could use heeled footwear from 30 min to eight hours continuously (mean=3 h) and, 88% were able to wear heel heights of 1.5 in. or higher. None of the patients wearing heeled footwear returned to the clinic with midfoot/hindfoot symptoms, one returned for worsening of pre-existing first IPJ (interphalangeal joint) symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study has important implications for information given to patients during the consent process for this operation. The results have shown that many patients continue to wear heeled footwear following first MTPJ fusion with minimal or no symptoms in neighbouring joints.

Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Early detection of breast cancer is diagnosed using mammography, the gold standard in breast screening. However, its increased use also provokes radiation-induced breast malignancy. Thus, monitoring and regulating the mean glandular dose (MGD) is essential. The purpose of this study was to determine MGD for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the radiology department of a single centre. We also analysed the exposure factors as a function of breast thickness. A total of 436 patients underwent both FFDM and DBT. MGD was auto calculated by the mammographic machine for each projection. Patients' data included compressed breast thickness (CBT), peak kilovoltage (kVp), milliampere-seconds (mAs) and MGD (mGy). Result analysis showed that there is a significant difference in MGD between the two systems, namely FFDM and DBT. However, the MGD values in our centre were comparable to other centres, as well as the European guideline (<2.5 mGy) for a standard breast. Although DBT improves the clinical outcome and quality of diagnosis, the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis should not be neglected. Regular quality control testing on mammography equipment must be performed for dose monitoring in women following a screening mammography in the future.

Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model.

BACKGROUND: Locking plate fixation in osteoporotic ankle fractures may fail due to cut-out or metalwork failure. Fibula pro-tibia fixation was a technique prior to the advent of locking plates that was used to enhance stability in ankle fractures by achieving tri or tetra-cortical fixation. With locking plates, the strength of this fixation construct can be further enhanced. There is lack of evidence currently on the merits of tibia-pro-fibula augmented locking plate fixation of unstable ankle fractures. AIM: To assess if there is increased strength to failure, in an ankle fracture saw bone model, with a fibula pro-tibia construct when compared with standard locking plate fixation. METHODS: Ten osteoporotic saw bones with simulated supination external rotation injuries were used. Five saw bones were fixed with standard locking plates whilst the other 5 saw bones were fixed with locking plates in a fibula pro-tibia construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct involved fixation with 3 consecutive locking screws applied across 3 cortices proximally from the level of the syndesmosis. All fixations were tested in axial external rotation to failure on an electromagnetic test frame (MTS 858 Mini-Bionix test machine, MTS Corp, Eden Praire, MN, United States). Torque at 30 degrees external rotation, failure torque, and external rotation angle at failure were compared between both groups and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The fibula pro-tibia construct demonstrated a statistically higher torque at 30 degrees external rotation (4.421 ± 0.796 N/m vs 1.451 ± 0.467 N/m; t-test P = 0.000), as well as maximum torque at failure (5.079 ± 0.694N/m vs 2.299 ± 0.931 N/m; t-test P = 0.001) compared to the standard locking plate construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct also had a lower external rotation angle at failure (54.7 ± 14.5 vs 67.7 ± 22.9). CONCLUSION: The fibula pro-tibia locking plate construct demonstrates biomechanical superiority to standard locking plates in fixation of unstable ankle fractures in this saw bone model. There is merit in the use of this construct in patients with unstable osteoporotic ankle fractures as it may aid improved clinical outcomes.

The use of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in the foot and ankle.

Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) therapy has demonstrated clinical effectiveness in achieving union in a variety of fracture situations.Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of LIPUS therapy in foot and ankle surgery.The overall rate of union in all published studies relating to the use of LIPUS in a variety of foot and ankle fracture and fusion situations is 95%.Some studies suggest lower healing rates (~ 67%) when LIPUS therapy is used to treat hindfoot fusion nonunion.A well-powered, high-quality, randomized controlled trial is needed to demonstrate the clinical and cost effectiveness of LIPUS therapy in foot and ankle surgery. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:217-224. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200045.

Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Procedures Addressing Long Head of Biceps Pathology: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The long head of biceps tendon is a common source of anterior shoulder pain and impaired function. Multiple surgical procedures are available as treatment options, but the optimal procedure is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature to assess the clinical effectiveness of various surgical procedures to treat pain arising from the long head of biceps. METHODS: The study protocol was designed and registered prospectively on PROSPERO (International prospective register for systematic reviews). Electronic databases used for the literature search will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical procedures on the long head of biceps will be included. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder. Secondary outcomes will include the rate of 'Popeye' deformity, the rate of biceps cramping pain, the rate of complications, objective measurements of strength testing such as dynamometer, and other patient-reported outcome measures not specific to the shoulder such as the Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Jadad score. Inconsistency and bias across included studies will be assessed statistically. Comparable outcome data will be pooled and analysed quantitatively or qualitatively as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical clearances required for this study. We plan to publish this systematic review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal. It will also be presented at various national and international conferences. HIGHLIGHTS: Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of surgical procedures for long head of biceps pathology.Randomised controlled trials.Biceps tenodesis and biceps tenotomy.Systematic review compliant with the PRISMA guideline.

Outcome of selective CT vs. pan-CT scan in elderly trauma patients: A retrospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: There are currently no clear guidelines for use of pan- or selective CT in elderly trauma patients and this subject matter remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of elderly trauma patients in a level 1 trauma centre who required a pan- or selective CT scan on admission. METHODS: The Trauma Audit Research Network database was reviewed to identify eligible patients (≥65 years) over a one-year period, from January 2018 to January 2019. Patients' demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality and type of CT scans done were recorded. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients ≥65 years involved in acute trauma setting (less than one day between incident and emergency department presentation and blunt mechanism of injury). Exclusion criteria were patients <65 years, perforating mechanism of injury and patients with delayed presentation more than one day after the incident, and patients who have not got any CT scan at presentation. Statistical analyses were undertaken on SPSS (version 25.0; IBM, New York, USA). RESULTS: In total, 481 patients with the mean age of 80.8 years were evaluated (48.6% male). Among them 232 cases were multiple injuries while 249 were single system injuries. And 235 patients (48.8%) underwent pan-CT in whom 66.8% were multiple injuries; 246 (51.1%) did selective CT scan in whom 69.5% were single system injuries. In multiple injury patients, performing a pan-CT scan on presentation was associated with shorter LOS compared to those who had a selective CT, in which 76.4% patients spent < 21 days in the pan-CT group compared to 16.0% for those investigated by selective CT scan (p < 0.001); and 2.5% spent > 60 days in pan-CT group compared to 64% in selective CT group (p < 0.0001). Performing pan-CT was also associated with lower need to repeat CT (p < 0.01). In patients with a single system injury, no differences were found in LOS or the need to repeat CT if either pan-CT or selective CT were requested. CONCLUSION: We recommend doing pan-CT scan in all elderly patients with multiple system injuries as it decreases the LOS and the need for another CT during hospital stay. No difference in LOS or the need to repeat another CT if pan-CT or selective CT were requested initially in single system injuries. Although age and injury severity score are poor predictors for the need to do pan-CT, the mechanism of injury may be helpful.

Clinical Effectiveness of Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid Use in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used across surgical specialties to reduce perioperative bleeding. It has been shown to be effective in spinal surgery and lower limb arthroplasty. Among all languages, there are no systematic reviews or meta-analyses investigating its clinical effectiveness for all types of shoulder surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of TXA in all types of shoulder surgery, including open and arthroscopic procedures. To investigate the effect of TXA on bleeding and non-bleeding-related outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A protocol for the study was designed and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020185482). The literature search included the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases. All randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of TXA against placebo, in all types of shoulder surgery, were included. Assessments were undertaken for risk of bias and certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes included those not directly related to bleeding. Data from comparable outcomes were pooled and analyzed quantitatively or descriptively, as appropriate. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review, and data from 7 of these studies were pooled in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in 2 of 3 outcomes measuring perioperative bleeding with TXA compared with controls: estimated total blood loss (mean difference, -209.66 mL; 95% CI, -389.11 to -30.21; P = .02) and postoperative blood loss as measured by drain output (mean difference, -84.8 mL; 95% CI, -140.04 to -29.56; P = .003). Hemoglobin reduction was reduced but not statistically significant (mean difference, -0.33 g/dL; 95% CI -0.69 to 0.03; P = .07). This result became significant with sensitivity analysis excluding arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that TXA was effective in reducing blood loss in shoulder surgery. Larger randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias for specific surgical shoulder procedures are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TXA can be used across shoulder surgery to reduced perioperative blood loss. The use of TXA may have other beneficial features, including reduced postoperative pain and reduced operative time.

The use of intra-operative tranexamic acid in shoulder surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Blood loss is an important consideration in all types of shoulder surgery. Excessive bleeding is associated with increased morbidity. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent. It has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing blood loss across multiple surgical specialties. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature evaluating clinical outcomes associated with the use of TXA in shoulder surgery. METHODS: The study protocol was designed and registered prospectively on PROSPERO (International prospective register for systematic reviews). Literature search will include the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of TXA against placebo, in all types of shoulder surgery, will be included. Our primary outcome is total blood loss (ml). Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), adverse events, and number of blood transfusions required. Risk of bias will be assessed within each study using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Jadad score. Inconsistency and bias across included studies will be assessed statistically. Data from comparable outcomes will be pooled and analysed quantitatively or descriptively as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical clearances required for this study. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. It will be presented a various national and international conferences.

Does the external remote controller's reading correspond to the actual lengthening in magnetic-controlled growing rods?

PURPOSE: Magnetic-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are now routinely used in many centres to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS). MCGR lengthening is done non-invasively by the external remote controller (ERC). Our experience suggests that there may be a discrepancy between the reported rod lengthening on the ERC and the actual rod lengthening. The aim of this study was to investigate this discrepancy. METHODS: This was a prospective series. Eleven patients who were already undergoing treatment for EOS using MCGRs were included in this study. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two sets of ultrasound readings were obtained (96 episodes of rod lengthening on dual-rod constructs) and compared to their ERC readings. Only 15/192 (7.8%) readings were accurate; 27 readings (14.9%) were false positive; and 8 readings (4.2%) were an underestimation while 142 readings (74.0%) were an overestimation by the ERC. Average over-reporting by the ERC was 5.31 times of the actual/ultrasound reading. When comparing interval radiographs with lengthening obtained on ultrasound, there was a discrepancy with an average overestimation of 1.35 times with ultrasound in our series. There was a significant difference between ERC and USS (p = 0.01) and ERC and XR (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between USS and XR (p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: The reading on the ERC does not equate to the actual rod lengthening. The authors would recommend that clinicians using the MCGR for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis include pre- and post-extension imaging (radiographs or ultrasound) to confirm extension lengths at each outpatient extension. In centres with ultrasound facilities, we would suggest that patients should have ultrasound to monitor each lengthening after distraction but also 6-month radiographs. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Can we reduce the number of MRSA screening site swabs in elective orthopedic patients?

BACKGROUND: Deep infection after routine elective orthopedic procedures can be catastrophic, leading to further surgery, loss of limb, disability, and risk of mortality. Ring-fencing elective orthopedic ward has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of all postoperative infections especially with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Our hospital's current MRSA screening is a four-site MRSA swabs. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the possibility of reducing the number of MRSA swab sites as part of a quality improvement project. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for elective orthopedic procedure in our trust who had an MRSA-positive swab from either four sites were analyzed over the time period from January 2012 to December 2014. Those without swabs from all four areas (nose, throat, axilla, and groin) were excluded. Positive swabs of different regions were recorded and compared. RESULTS: There were 138 MRSA-positive patients, giving an incidence of 31 per 10,000 screen/year over that time period. Some patients ( n = 31, 22.5%) had a positive swab in more than one site. The positive sites were as follows: nose (69.60%, n = 96), groin (26.10%, n = 36), throat (25.30%, n = 35), and axilla (8.70%, n = 12). In our cohort, we would miss a significant proportion of positive patients if we change it to a two swab screening policy (26.8% for nose and axilla combination; 18.10% for nose and groin combination; and 15.20% for nose and throat). However, we would only miss 2.2% of cases for a nose, groin, and throat three-swab policy. There were also 11 instances, where a previously negative site become positive in the next swab. CONCLUSION: A three-swab combination of nasal, throat, and groin swabs improves pickup rate of MRSA significantly compared to a two-swab policy and misses only 2.2% compared to a four-swab policy. Axilla swabbing does not make a significant difference to the results. Based on this study, the policy has now been changed from a four-swab to three-swab screening in our trust. This has now been audited four times and they were all negative. This has helped to reduce cost in terms of staff time and resources. We would not recommend screening only the previous positive site for the next repeat screening swabs as there is an 8% chance of missing MRSA carrier status.

Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus.

BACKGROUND:: Following failure of conservative treatment, a dorsal cheilectomy can be performed for patients in early stages of hallux rigidus by a traditional open approach or by a minimally invasive technique. We report our clinical outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC). METHODS:: Eighty-nine patients (98 feet) with symptomatic hallux rigidus treated between 2011 and 2016 were included in this study. The average age was 54 years. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were collected. The mean follow-up was 50 months. RESULTS:: The average VAS score improved from 8.0 preoperatively to 3 postoperatively. The mean MOxFQ summary index score decreased from 58.6 preoperatively to 30.5 postoperatively. All 3 MOxFQ domains also improved. Swelling took an average of 5.3 weeks to settle. There were 2 wound infections and 2 delayed wound healings. Two patients had transient nerve paraesthesia, while 2 patients had permanent numbness in the dorsomedial cutaneous nerve distribution. Twelve patients (12%) underwent reoperation, of which 7 had a first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for ongoing pain, 4 had repeat cheilectomy for residual impingement, and 1 had an open removal of loose bone. CONCLUSION:: Our results suggest that MIDC resulted in improvement in patient-reported outcome measures and was a safe technique with minimal complications. The complications were similar to open cheilectomy. There was an associated learning curve as 5 of our reoperations were due to incomplete cheilectomy. Coughlin grade 1 did well with MIDC as with open cheilectomy as none went onto an arthrodesis. However, 10% (7/65) of our grade 2 and 3 cases went on to an arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Mid-term clinical results of the cementless R3 cup and Polarstem total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There has been a shift from cemented to uncemented hip arthroplasty. One popular uncemented combination is the R3 acetabular cup with Polarstem, having the lowest revision rate in the UK National Joint Registry. However, there are no medium-term clinical outcomes on this combination in the literature. The aim of this study is to review our centre's outcomes with this combination using conventional bearings with a minimum of 7-year follow-up. METHODS: Using our centre's arthroplasty database, we identified all patients that underwent a total hip arthroplasty using these implants from August 2009 to December 2010. One hundred and forty-four procedures were performed. The primary outcome was revision rate, and the secondary outcomes were clinical and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: The mean cohort age at surgery was 68.3 years. There were three revisions, of which only one underwent a cup revision. The mean Oxford Hip Score at 7-year follow-up was 38. Radiological evaluation of both acetabular and stem component did not show any radiolucency at 7-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an implant survival rate of 97.69% at 7 years using revision for all causes as endpoint. The risk of revision was 1.47% at 7 years. CONCLUSION: Our revision rates are comparable to the UK's National Joint Registry, with excellent clinical and radiological outcome. Our results correlate with the allocated rating of 7A* by the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel for both R3 acetabular cup and Polarstem.